Death Penalty Question

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Im Pro-Life/Anti-Death Penalty.

The only civilized position. 

more like the worst position ever.
[/quote

What's your angle, newbie?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Im Pro-Life/Anti-Death Penalty.

The only civilized position. 

more like the worst position ever.

What's your angle, newbie?

opposing the death penalty is dume how you can oppose killing our enemies if you oppose your nothing but a hippy daisy picker we need to expand death penalty you kill once you get the death penalty.

I oppose killing my or anybody else's enemies among other reasons because I'm a Christian. If you support you're nothing but a bloodthirsty atheist*.


*Mods, I'm aware that this sentence doesn't make any sense. I'm engaging in a dialectic, here...

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Im Pro-Life/Anti-Death Penalty.

The only civilized position. 

more like the worst position ever.

What's your angle, newbie?

opposing the death penalty is dume how you can oppose killing our enemies if you oppose your nothing but a hippy daisy picker we need to expand death penalty you kill once you get the death penalty.

I oppose killing my or anybody else's enemies among other reasons because I'm a Christian. If you support you're nothing but a bloodthirsty atheist*.


*Mods, I'm aware that this sentence doesn't make any sense. I'm engaging in a dialectic, here...

Wow you people make me sick you want to keep murders alive that evil your a pagan for that & that wrong we should kill all criminals and murders if you commit a crime you should get the penalty we need to expand it for example if you do arm robbery i say death penalty is needed.

What crimes, if any, would you concede that the death penalty might be excessive, unnecessary, or just plain ineffectual as a deterrent for?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Im Pro-Life/Anti-Death Penalty.

The only civilized position. 

more like the worst position ever.

What's your angle, newbie?

opposing the death penalty is dume how you can oppose killing our enemies if you oppose your nothing but a hippy daisy picker we need to expand death penalty you kill once you get the death penalty.

I oppose killing my or anybody else's enemies among other reasons because I'm a Christian. If you support you're nothing but a bloodthirsty atheist*.


*Mods, I'm aware that this sentence doesn't make any sense. I'm engaging in a dialectic, here...

Wow you people make me sick you want to keep murders alive that evil your a pagan for that & that wrong we should kill all criminals and murders if you commit a crime you should get the penalty we need to expand it for example if you do arm robbery i say death penalty is needed.

What crimes, if any, would you concede that the death penalty might be excessive, unnecessary, or just plain ineffectual as a deterrent for?

If you murder somebody you should get the death penalty it that simple. If you commit armed robery or steal from a bank you should to. It a good idea.

I get that you feel that way. Are there any crimes you don't feel that way about? What about mail fraud, for example?