VA: Public Policy Polling: Obama with an 8% Lead Over Romney; 12% W/ Goode
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 18, 2024, 09:56:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  VA: Public Policy Polling: Obama with an 8% Lead Over Romney; 12% W/ Goode
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VA: Public Policy Polling: Obama with an 8% Lead Over Romney; 12% W/ Goode  (Read 6132 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,028
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 01, 2012, 01:03:24 PM »
« edited: May 01, 2012, 01:41:17 PM by Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC »

New Poll: Virginia President by Public Policy Polling on 2012-04-29

Summary: D: 50%, R: 38%, I: 5%, U: 7%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Q7 If the candidates for President this year were

Democrat Barack Obama and Republican Mitt

Romney, who would you vote for?

Barack Obama................................................ 51%

Mitt Romney.................................................... 43%

Undecided....................................................... 6%

Q9 If the candidates for President this fall were
Democrat Barack Obama, Republican Mitt
Romney, and Constitution Party candidate
Virgil Goode, who would you vote for?
Barack Obama................................................ 50%
Mitt Romney.................................................... 38%
Virgil Goode .................................................... 5%
Undecided....................................................... 7%
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,932


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2012, 01:14:49 PM »

Q9 If the candidates for President this fall were
Democrat Barack Obama, Republican Mitt
Romney, and Constitution Party candidate
Virgil Goode, who would you vote for?
Barack Obama................................................ 50%
Mitt Romney.................................................... 38%
Virgil Goode .................................................... 5%
Undecided....................................................... 7%

whatevuh
Logged
old timey villain
cope1989
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,741


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2012, 01:15:12 PM »

Virginia has made a total 180 in less than 10 years
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2012, 02:03:11 PM »

Virginia has made a total 180 in less than 10 years

It seems like a lot of the top growing states in absolute numbers (TX, CA, FL, GA, NC, AZ, VA) are slowly trending away from Republicans.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_United_States_Census#State_rankings
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 01, 2012, 02:05:33 PM »

Sadly, those growth areas aren't where real Democrats come from. I'd prefer a tough progressive party to the wishy-washy suburban neoliberals we're getting in the Sunbelt.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,837
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 01, 2012, 03:34:21 PM »

Virginia has made a total 180 in less than 10 years

Virginia used to be one of the most reliable R states in Presidential elections. Clinton never won the state. It was the only former Confederate State that Jimmy Carter didn't get in 1976.

I'm not sure that it has quite turned 180 degrees. It is close to the national average. I am not sure that the 8% margin for President Obama is valid, but the challenge of someone on the Right as a meaningful alternative to Mitt Romney (Constitution, Libertarian, Conservative) looks like an unmitigated disaster for Romney.

Conservative third-party alternative candidates could swing such states as Arizona, Georgia, Missouri, and Montana and cause the President to hold onto Indiana and one of the districts of Nebraska.
Logged
old timey villain
cope1989
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,741


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 01, 2012, 05:01:17 PM »

Sadly, those growth areas aren't where real Democrats come from. I'd prefer a tough progressive party to the wishy-washy suburban neoliberals we're getting in the Sunbelt.

well those suburban neo liberals have kept many states blue while the working class dems have been flirting with the GOP for years. Pennsylvania is a good example, it has stayed a democratic state since 1988 thanks to Philly suburbanites consistently voting for the Dem nominee. If democrats hadn't picked up those voters, the Republican trend in western PA would have turned the whole state red.

And really, if these blue collar workers still aren't convinced that the Democratic party is the one truly fighting for them, do we even want them in our coalition?
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2012, 05:04:24 PM »

They're not convinced because Clinton and Obama have sold them out time and time again. Affluent suburbia drags our party to the center because they care more about same-sex marriage than, say, the right to form a union or keeping manufacturing in the United States. They don't care about the worker.
Logged
old timey villain
cope1989
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,741


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2012, 05:09:00 PM »

They're not convinced because Clinton and Obama have sold them out time and time again. Affluent suburbia drags our party to the center because they care more about same-sex marriage than, say, the right to form a union or keeping manufacturing in the United States. They don't care about the worker.

You could say the same thing about many blue collar dems. They also care more about same sex marriage than union rights. Many let GOP cultural talking points cloud the economic issues that really matter. And between Obama and Romney, it's still clear that one man cares more about the average worker than the other one does.
Logged
mondale84
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2012, 05:38:10 PM »

They're not convinced because Clinton and Obama have sold them out time and time again. Affluent suburbia drags our party to the center because they care more about same-sex marriage than, say, the right to form a union or keeping manufacturing in the United States. They don't care about the worker.

You could say the same thing about many blue collar dems. They also care more about same sex marriage than union rights. Many let GOP cultural talking points cloud the economic issues that really matter. And between Obama and Romney, it's still clear that one man cares more about the average worker than the other one does.

AMEN
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2012, 06:14:11 PM »

Religion is quite an enabler of neoliberalism. Part of the reason I want to see it die off
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 01, 2012, 06:15:27 PM »

If Obama's leading by 8 in VA, he should be leading/tied with Romney in North Carolina.

Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 01, 2012, 06:17:14 PM »

They're not convinced because Clinton and Obama have sold them out time and time again. Affluent suburbia drags our party to the center because they care more about same-sex marriage than, say, the right to form a union or keeping manufacturing in the United States. They don't care about the worker.

You could say the same thing about many blue collar dems. They also care more about same sex marriage than union rights. Many let GOP cultural talking points cloud the economic issues that really matter. And between Obama and Romney, it's still clear that one man cares more about the average worker than the other one does.

Then we need to dig into the economic issues in the way we haven't. We've danced around the issue while supporting extended free trade agreements and allowed greater outsourcing. You win a voter group with a platform that appeals to them, and standing in favor of real reform and against the elites, the donors who control both parties, will give the Democrats a winning coalition of blacks, Hispanics, and blue-collar whites.
Logged
old timey villain
cope1989
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,741


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 01, 2012, 06:40:53 PM »

I don't see why the democratic party can't fight for both equal rights and economic fairness, as both platforms seek to help the disadvantaged and underprivileged, which has been the base of the party for many years. If certain people can't stomach voting for a party that fights for gay rights and union benefits, then it's their loss.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 01, 2012, 07:00:00 PM »

The gay rights fight is simple; after winning in 2012, let Obama replace the old conservatives and wait for a case to come up.

And we have to prioritize; more people are suffering without a job than without a marriage license.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 01, 2012, 07:05:01 PM »

I don't see why the democratic party can't fight for both equal rights and economic fairness, as both platforms seek to help the disadvantaged and underprivileged, which has been the base of the party for many years. If certain people can't stomach voting for a party that fights for gay rights and union benefits, then it's their loss.

I agree, this isn't an either/or proposition...

Snowie... the progressive movement is a lot more ... mixed than you'd like it to be.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,127
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 01, 2012, 11:36:13 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well, one of us has been posting this pretty consistantly. If Virgil Goode hits 15 percent nationally, this election is over.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,172
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 02, 2012, 12:11:18 AM »

Dominating.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,658
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 03, 2012, 02:53:01 AM »

Most of that 5% is probably not specific to Goode, but shows openness to a nonRomney, nonObama candidate. I'm surprised 38% of Virginians know enough of Goode to have an opinion about him.  I wish they did a regional breakdown to see if support for him was much higher in his CD.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 03, 2012, 03:46:50 AM »

Religion is quite an enabler of neoliberalism. Part of the reason I want to see it die off
Explain?
Snowie: Biggest Sunbelt gains are among growing minorities, and are more likely to stick to the Democratic party if we bring labor back into the equation. There is a long tradition of social democracy in Latin America, I don't think white voters in Rust Belt/Midwest would accept a true left platform outside of maybe Michigan and obviously polarized IL. If you want to bring back social justice in the short-term in US your best bet is for Democrats to nominate someone Hispanic in 2016 and hope they can swing Texas & Arizona not lose everything else because of unprecedented minority turnout. Getting a working congress would be a bigger challenge.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,220


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 03, 2012, 03:50:33 AM »

Religion is quite an enabler of neoliberalism. Part of the reason I want to see it die off

Baby, bathwater, bizarrely obsessed with this concept...
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,062
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 03, 2012, 05:26:03 AM »

And we have to prioritize; more people are suffering without a job than without a marriage license.
We've been doing that. It's not like the Democratic Party is going to totally abandon the middle class to become the Gay Marriage Party.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,190
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 03, 2012, 12:33:00 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well, one of us has been posting this pretty consistantly. If Virgil Goode hits 15 4percent nationally, this election is over.

Corrected. And even 2-3% would make a real uphill climb for Romney.

A moot point, however, as I doubt Goode will even do that well come Election Day.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 03, 2012, 06:40:56 PM »

Religion is quite an enabler of neoliberalism. Part of the reason I want to see it die off
Explain?

Just look at Oklahoma and Utah. Does anybody really think that the elected Republicans are religious?

They just wrap themselves in it in order to get millions of evangelical votes and waste all of our time talking about stupid things like birth control instead of the distribution of income/wealth and the blatant purchasing of government policy by those with money. They are using its opportunity cost to their advantage.

Not that the Democrats do very much on their own to pass economic legislation really benefiting the vast majority of the country even when they have majorities. The 2010 healthcare reform is the perfect example. Individual mandate to buy a private for-profit product that the government could provide for a lower price and it didn't even touch the anti-trust exemptions, Medicare Rx negotiation ban, pharmaceutical drug import ban, pharmaceutical profit patents, etc.

It's incremental because incremental is the only realistic option according to the people who own the political system. They need to make more money in the mean time or what's the point right?
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 03, 2012, 06:44:18 PM »

I wish we could, you know, talk about the poll itself rather than getting boggled down in side conversation.  YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN??!?!?!?!  Huh  Angry
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 14 queries.