I never said Mitt Romney wasn't a phony, but he actually has a shot of winning. He's not blowing his chances out of proportion. I understand the minor parties run candidates for President to get their names out there, but when they actually believe they're going to win? Nuh uh.
The point I was making about Hospers was that he won an electoral vote in '72. Johnson won't win an electoral vote.
If you're going to sell out, be my guest. But don't act indignant and self-righteous just because Johnson wants to boost some (well-needed) morale for the LP.
You really think that Johnson thinks that he'll win?
citationNobody runs a campaign saying they're going to lose (especially not with fleeting bedfellows such as yourself.)
Besides, John Hospers got like, 3000 votes and his one electoral vote was astroturf. If anything, Johnson would actually be in okay shape to get an electoral vote since Paulites are taking over State Conventions (which, in some states, choose electors.)
For the sake of argument, I'll cede that Johnson's candidacy (and support) is predicated on the fact that he can "get votes." Romney's entire
existence has been about getting votes, principles and results be damned. What's your beef?
But hey, if you're content to stay on the GOPlantation and vote for nominees that have literally nothing in common with you, then go ahead.
... just to serve in politics.
Well, I must admit that campaigning in a Republican primary on a platform to legalize gay marriage and marijuana is generally the mark of a shrewd politician.