Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 24, 2017, 09:06:53 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: TexasGurl, Torie, Senator PiT, PPT)
| | |-+  Joe Biden endorses gay marriage
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Joe Biden endorses gay marriage  (Read 4006 times)
Justice TJ
TJ in Cleve
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 6.96

View Profile
« Reply #25 on: May 08, 2012, 10:24:23 am »
Ignore

Dictionaries can be changed. That much is only a function of language.
Logged

"A thought sent back in time to the theocracy panic of 2005: If you dislike the religious right, wait till you meet the post-religious right." -Ross Douthat

Donald Trump is not a poster on the Atlas Forum, so no, I can't infract him for violating the ToS.
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18254
United States


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: May 08, 2012, 11:08:18 am »
Ignore

Dictionaries can be changed. That much is only a function of language.

then be honest - you want to redefine marriage.
Logged

Do not fight with one another over my banning.  I've enjoyed the time I have spent with all of you, but the time really has come for me to leave.  It is what I want.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Y_GLT4_9I

I looked over Jordan, and what did I see?
Coming for to carry me home,
A band of angels coming after me,
Coming for to carry me home.

Swing low, sweet chariot,
Coming for to carry me home.
Justice TJ
TJ in Cleve
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: 6.96

View Profile
« Reply #27 on: May 08, 2012, 11:23:39 am »
Ignore

Dictionaries can be changed. That much is only a function of language.

then be honest - you want to redefine marriage.

I never said I wanted to, just that it could be done by the standard he's presenting. That's a huge difference.
Logged

"A thought sent back in time to the theocracy panic of 2005: If you dislike the religious right, wait till you meet the post-religious right." -Ross Douthat

Donald Trump is not a poster on the Atlas Forum, so no, I can't infract him for violating the ToS.
opebo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 47114


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: May 08, 2012, 11:49:42 am »
Ignore

...as it was in the days of Lot, even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.

You mean they had a nice Vice President then too?
Logged

The essence of democracy at its purest is a lynch mob

Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14386


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: May 08, 2012, 12:17:05 pm »
Ignore

Dictionaries can be changed. That much is only a function of language.

then be honest - you want to redefine marriage.

There's a long tradition of redefining marriage, starting from the creation of civil marriage, the change in women's status from property to equal partner, changing views on divorce, the allowance of interfaith marriages, development of marriage for love, development of marriage for seniors, and the legalization of interracial marriage. Within the current definition of marriage, allowing same-sex unions to be counted is not as dramatic as other changes.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18254
United States


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: May 08, 2012, 12:47:22 pm »
Ignore

Dictionaries can be changed. That much is only a function of language.

then be honest - you want to redefine marriage.

There's a long tradition of redefining marriage, starting from the creation of civil marriage, the change in women's status from property to equal partner, changing views on divorce, the allowance of interfaith marriages, development of marriage for love, development of marriage for seniors, and the legalization of interracial marriage. Within the current definition of marriage, allowing same-sex unions to be counted is not as dramatic as other changes.

dude, those are NOT changes to the definition of marriage, for there are thousands of years of history.

Heck, you can find examples of everything bolded, even in the bible.

Historically, you had recognition of marriages without a certificate of marriage (the couple simply had to present themselves to the public as husband and wife), marriages between seniors, marriages between the races.

Though, I have no idea what you mean by “development of marriage for love”…as if marrying for love’s sake is something new…as if it was always forced and pre-arranged?


Logged

Do not fight with one another over my banning.  I've enjoyed the time I have spent with all of you, but the time really has come for me to leave.  It is what I want.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Y_GLT4_9I

I looked over Jordan, and what did I see?
Coming for to carry me home,
A band of angels coming after me,
Coming for to carry me home.

Swing low, sweet chariot,
Coming for to carry me home.
Trounce-'em Theresa
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19678


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: May 08, 2012, 01:13:32 pm »
Ignore

It was certainly considered a type of business contract in most civilizations. Maybe among the peasantry there was greater leeway but that's certainly not normative in the historical record.

Marriage really isn't one of those things that you can present as normative from and for eternity (at least, not from a historical perspective; from a religious perspective you certainly can if you're not hung up on the historical perspective) without going through some pretty convoluted retroactive redefinition anyway.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2012, 01:34:38 pm by Nathan »Logged



Professor Nathan. A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

Yeah that's right, I said Siam. Why don't you go tell Pedro Martinez
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18254
United States


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: May 08, 2012, 01:41:54 pm »
Ignore

It was certainly considered a type of business contract in most civilizations. Maybe among the peasantry there was greater leeway but that's certainly not normative in the historical record.

Marriage really isn't one of those things that you can present as normative from and for eternity (at least, not from a historical perspective; from a religious perspective you certainly can if you're not hung up on the historical perspective) without going through some pretty convoluted retroactive redefinition anyway.

are you saying the bible doesn't view marriage as a contract of love?
« Last Edit: May 08, 2012, 02:15:22 pm by consigliere jmfcst »Logged

Do not fight with one another over my banning.  I've enjoyed the time I have spent with all of you, but the time really has come for me to leave.  It is what I want.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Y_GLT4_9I

I looked over Jordan, and what did I see?
Coming for to carry me home,
A band of angels coming after me,
Coming for to carry me home.

Swing low, sweet chariot,
Coming for to carry me home.
Oakvale
oakvale
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11468
Ireland, Republic of
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: May 08, 2012, 02:13:22 pm »
Ignore

Could someone explain to me what the legal difference between civil unions and marriage for same-sex couples is in the United States?
Logged

#Laughmyossoff
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39049
Heard Island and McDonald Islands
View Profile
« Reply #34 on: May 08, 2012, 02:20:27 pm »
Ignore

Could someone explain to me what the legal difference between civil unions and marriage for same-sex couples is in the United States?

Aside from taxes and health insurance and all the privileges married couples enjoy?
Logged

Grumps isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer, and shouldn't be taken seriously


I won't be a little Inks.

Roll Eyes
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18254
United States


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: May 08, 2012, 02:22:44 pm »
Ignore

Could someone explain to me what the legal difference between civil unions and marriage for same-sex couples is in the United States?

Aside from taxes and health insurance and all the privileges married couples enjoy?

actually, for the vast majority of cases, there is a tax penalty for being married.

and, what, exactly are these "privileges"?
Logged

Do not fight with one another over my banning.  I've enjoyed the time I have spent with all of you, but the time really has come for me to leave.  It is what I want.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Y_GLT4_9I

I looked over Jordan, and what did I see?
Coming for to carry me home,
A band of angels coming after me,
Coming for to carry me home.

Swing low, sweet chariot,
Coming for to carry me home.
greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2641


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #36 on: May 08, 2012, 02:37:43 pm »
Ignore

Could someone explain to me what the legal difference between civil unions and marriage for same-sex couples is in the United States?

Main legal difference is recognition I believe.

There has been no compact for states to recognize other states' civil unions like there has been for marriage (in addition to making the federal government not recognize any same-sex marriage, the federal DOMA law also said states can choose to avoid to recognize other states' marriages if it is between a same-sex couple) and there are many federal legal rights and benefits (such as spousal/survivor Social Security benefits) that civil unions will not confer unless the statutes are rewritten to include civil unions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights_and_responsibilities_of_marriages_in_the_United_States
Logged
Trounce-'em Theresa
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19678


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: May 08, 2012, 02:39:17 pm »
Ignore

It was certainly considered a type of business contract in most civilizations. Maybe among the peasantry there was greater leeway but that's certainly not normative in the historical record.

Marriage really isn't one of those things that you can present as normative from and for eternity (at least, not from a historical perspective; from a religious perspective you certainly can if you're not hung up on the historical perspective) without going through some pretty convoluted retroactive redefinition anyway.

are you saying the bible doesn't view marriage as a contract of love?

Well, I mean, that's normative within the Bible, certainly, but it's hard to argue that it's the case with every specific marriage presented or discussed. I'm not really discussing the Bible here anyway, more the general way things were structured in ancient societies (and many modern societies, for that matter).
Logged



Professor Nathan. A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

Yeah that's right, I said Siam. Why don't you go tell Pedro Martinez
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16198
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #38 on: May 08, 2012, 03:04:07 pm »
Ignore

Marriage for love as an ideal has always existed, though other concerns have often taken precedence.
Logged
Trounce-'em Theresa
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19678


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: May 08, 2012, 03:14:35 pm »
Ignore

Marriage for love as an ideal has always existed, though other concerns have often taken precedence.

Exactly. What constitutes that ideal is culturally specific, as is how frequently it's upheld, but that core has always been there. The point is that practically nothing else, certainly nothing of the practice, has been universal.
Logged



Professor Nathan. A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

Yeah that's right, I said Siam. Why don't you go tell Pedro Martinez
Nice Guy FF
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7609
United States


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: May 08, 2012, 03:57:11 pm »
Ignore

...as it was in the days of Noah, even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.
Fixed. Don't misquote The Bible for your own benefit.
Logged

Why should I even have a signature?
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18254
United States


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: May 08, 2012, 04:09:26 pm »
Ignore

...as it was in the days of Lot Noah, even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.
Fixed. Don't misquote The Bible for your own benefit.

are you serious?  it wasn't a quote, it was a paraphrase, here is the actual quote:

Luke 17:26 “Just as it was in the days of Noah, so also will it be in the days of the Son of Man. 27 People were eating, drinking, marrying and being given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the ark. Then the flood came and destroyed them all.  28 “It was the same in the days of Lot. People were eating and drinking, buying and selling, planting and building. 29 But the day Lot left Sodom, fire and sulfur rained down from heaven and destroyed them all. 30 It will be just like this on the day the Son of Man is revealed".

So, either way you slice it, my statement may not have been verbatim, but it was still accurate.
Logged

Do not fight with one another over my banning.  I've enjoyed the time I have spent with all of you, but the time really has come for me to leave.  It is what I want.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Y_GLT4_9I

I looked over Jordan, and what did I see?
Coming for to carry me home,
A band of angels coming after me,
Coming for to carry me home.

Swing low, sweet chariot,
Coming for to carry me home.
Compassion Fills the Void
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 80056
Ukraine


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: May 09, 2012, 11:00:20 pm »
Ignore

http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/05/06/478786/biden-marriage

So bets on when Obama does? I'll say February 2013.

February 2015. Dude has a midterm election to get through.

Well we both were quite off.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines