Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2014, 08:47:23 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: True Federalist, Former Moderate, Badger)
| | |-+  Is a former President a veteran?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Is a former President a veteran?
Yes   -7 (21.9%)
No   -25 (78.1%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 32

Author Topic: Is a former President a veteran?  (Read 643 times)
President William McKinley
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4495
United States


View Profile
« on: May 09, 2012, 10:22:37 am »
Ignore

Had this debate last night with two folks at my post... I made the argument that because the President is the Commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces- he is an active duty member of the military. Since the SECDEF is second in the command structure- he also. My friends made the very true points that often the President is not a veteran otherwise...he hasn't gone thru recruit training, doesn't have to pass PFTs, doesn't live any semblance of an active duty military lifestyle, etc....

These are all true but I argue Obama will be a veteran on January 20, 2013 or 2017 since he is currently in the service by virtue of his position.

What do you think?
Logged

Strategos Autokrator
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5553


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2012, 10:36:00 am »
Ignore

Only if the president went through a situation similar to Harrison Ford in Air Force One or Bill Pullman in Independence Day. Tongue
Logged

President William McKinley
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4495
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2012, 10:41:07 am »
Ignore

LOL!
Logged

asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11302


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2012, 11:09:28 am »
Ignore

He's not a veteran in the conventional sense but considering how much sleep he undoubtedly loses over the military and military issues it's certainly reasonable to conclude that in some sense he is, or at least should be afforded similar respect to what one would afford a veteran.
Logged

A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights.

His idea of freedom is - it is a bad thing and should be stopped at all costs.

Nathan-land.  As much fun as watching paint dry... literally.
Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8097


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2012, 12:27:53 pm »
Ignore

I don't know. I'd say yes technically but he has no formal rank and such.
Logged

rwoy
Full Member
***
Posts: 232
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2012, 12:32:34 pm »
Ignore

No

There is a very clear distinction that although the military reports to the President, the President IS NOT a military position.
Logged
angus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14354
Political Matrix
E: 1.87, S: -7.65

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 09, 2012, 01:22:55 pm »
Ignore

He is not.  The whole point was to have the military under the control of a civilian.  It was never the Founders intent that the president be a member of the army he commands.  See, for example, Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Papers number 28, or James Madison's comments in number 41.

Logged
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2416
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 09, 2012, 03:54:13 pm »
Ignore

I concur with Angus on this subject. Aside from that, I'd not say that ex-Presidents are veterans
by virtue of their roles as Commander in Chief. Rather they're more like former inmates who got
themselves into a world of trouble and ended up serving hard time at the Executive Penitentiary.
Logged

Liberal socialist
Political Matrix results: -3 (Economic), -8 (Social)
Emperor Scott
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17266
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -5.74

View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: May 09, 2012, 03:58:36 pm »
Ignore

I don't think so... I'm not sure how often the title of veteran is awarded to people who have been in or ran the military but never fought themselves.
Logged



R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21655
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 09, 2012, 05:49:34 pm »
Ignore

No. Unless you've been in the war, or have been in a war setting, you shouldn't be considered a veteran.
Logged

ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13296
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 09, 2012, 05:52:03 pm »
Ignore

No.
Logged

America's like that hot chick everyone wants, and illegal immigrants are all the nerds that she should say "no" to.
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20906
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 09, 2012, 06:51:55 pm »
Ignore

I don't think so... I'm not sure how often the title of veteran is awarded to people who have been in or ran the military but never fought themselves.
Everyday.
No. Unless you've been in the war, or have been in a war setting, you shouldn't be considered a veteran.
Then most veterans are not veterans.

To be a veteran, all you have to do is serve for 4 years.
Logged

Quote from:   Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
angus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14354
Political Matrix
E: 1.87, S: -7.65

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 09, 2012, 07:56:40 pm »
Ignore

To be a veteran, all you have to do is serve for 4 years.

No, all you have to do is serve, be it for a day or for a decade.  The time doesn't matter.

Serve here is the key word.  A reservist, for example, would not be a veteran.  Although "serve" is the root of the word reserve, being a reservist does not count for active duty unless your unit is called and you report for duty, at least according to the PBS reports that focus on the sorry state of our veterans' services.  Someone who signs up in the regular army or navy, then is discharged a day later whether honorably or dishonorably, is a veteran.  Someone who signs up for the national guard or reserves, and is in it for 30 years, but who never gets action, is not a veteran, by the current definition of the Veteran's Administration.

But all that is off topic.  The question only asked whether holding the office of president qualified one as a veteran.  Clearly this was never the intent of the founders.  Of course, it is possible to be both a president and a veteran.  This was the case of George Washington, and most recently in the case of George H. W. Bush, and maybe even in the case of his son.  It was never clear to me whether the Bush the Younger was a veteran.  I know he was called to "active duty" at some point while he was in the Air National Guard, but my impression of his service is based mostly on an episode of Family Guy and not on US Department of Defense records, so I'm a bit mystified.  
Logged
Abdul the Reformer
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37908
Turkey
View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: May 10, 2012, 07:20:55 am »
Ignore

There is a civilian authority over the Armed Forces.

So no.
Logged

Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6265
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 10, 2012, 12:35:22 pm »
Ignore

No, because of this:

He is not.  The whole point was to have the military under the control of a civilian.  It was never the Founders intent that the president be a member of the army he commands.  See, for example, Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Papers number 28, or James Madison's comments in number 41.


Logged

President William McKinley
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4495
United States


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 10, 2012, 01:08:22 pm »
Ignore

To be a veteran, all you have to do is serve for 4 years.

No, all you have to do is serve, be it for a day or for a decade.  The time doesn't matter.

Serve here is the key word.  A reservist, for example, would not be a veteran.  Although "serve" is the root of the word reserve, being a reservist does not count for active duty unless your unit is called and you report for duty, at least according to the PBS reports that focus on the sorry state of our veterans' services.  Someone who signs up in the regular army or navy, then is discharged a day later whether honorably or dishonorably, is a veteran.  Someone who signs up for the national guard or reserves, and is in it for 30 years, but who never gets action, is not a veteran, by the current definition of the Veteran's Administration.

But all that is off topic.  The question only asked whether holding the office of president qualified one as a veteran.  Clearly this was never the intent of the founders.  Of course, it is possible to be both a president and a veteran.  This was the case of George Washington, and most recently in the case of George H. W. Bush, and maybe even in the case of his son.  It was never clear to me whether the Bush the Younger was a veteran.  I know he was called to "active duty" at some point while he was in the Air National Guard, but my impression of his service is based mostly on an episode of Family Guy and not on US Department of Defense records, so I'm a bit mystified. 

That's correct...if I was medically discharged the day I graduated recruit training, I'd be a veteran still
Logged

opebo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 47646


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 10, 2012, 05:31:46 pm »
Ignore

That was very interesting - I was still able to vote in a poll, though I cannot comment on the poll.  When you go on moderator review, you'll still be able to vote in polls!
Logged

The essence of democracy at its purest is a lynch mob

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines