Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 24, 2014, 01:07:23 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: True Federalist, Former Moderate, Badger)
| | |-+  Judge rules that viewing child porn on the Web is legal
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Judge rules that viewing child porn on the Web is legal  (Read 755 times)
Governor Varavour
Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10826


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: 5.91

View Profile
« on: May 08, 2012, 06:03:46 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Viewing child pornography online isn't a crime, the New York Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday in the case of a college professor whose work computer was found to have stored more than a hundred illegal images in its Web cache.

The court dismissed one of the two counts of promoting a sexual performance of a child and one of the dozens of counts of possession of child pornography on which James D. Kent was convicted. The court upheld the other counts against Kent, an assistant professor of public administration at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, N.Y.

Kent who said at his sentencing that he "abhorred" child pornography and argued that someone else at Marist must have placed the images on his computer was sentenced to one to three years in state prison in August 2009.

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/08/11602955-viewing-child-porn-on-the-web-legal-in-new-york-state-appeals-court-finds?lite
Logged

greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2577


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2012, 06:15:54 pm »
Ignore

It's still illegal to host it but I have to say that I don't like the idea of the government being able to fine/incarcerate people for seeing something
Logged
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2549
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2012, 06:35:56 pm »
Ignore

Though I consider such material disgusting, I think that possessing or viewing it causes no harm.
Logged

"I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to see realized." ~ Nelson Mandela
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28462
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2012, 07:49:28 pm »

Though I consider such material disgusting, I think that possessing or viewing it causes no harm.

The creation of it, especially the pre-pubescent junk, does cause harm.  Coming down hard on the possession and viewing of it is intended to discourage the demand that leads to it being made.
Logged

My ballot:
Ervin(I) Gov.
Sellers(D) Lt. Gov.
Hammond(R) Sec. of State
Diggs(D) Att. Gen.
Herbert(D) Comptroller Gen.
Spearman(R) Supt. of Education
DeFelice(American) Commissioner of Agriculture
Hutto(D/Working Families) US Sen (full)
Scott(R) US Sen (special)
Geddings(Labor) US House SC-2
Quinn(R) SC House District 69
TBD: Lex 1 School Board
Yes: Am. 1 (allow charity raffles)
No: Am. 2 (end election of the Adj. General)
No: Local Sales Tax
Yes: Temp Beer/Wine Permits
tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35677
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.52, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2012, 07:58:42 pm »
Ignore

Though I consider such material disgusting, I think that possessing or viewing it causes no harm.

The creation of it, especially the pre-pubescent junk, does cause harm.  Coming down hard on the possession and viewing of it is intended to discourage the demand that leads to it being made.

a line of logic that has worked out well in the other areas it has been tried.
Logged

in a mirror, dimly lit
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28462
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 08, 2012, 08:08:50 pm »

Though I consider such material disgusting, I think that possessing or viewing it causes no harm.

The creation of it, especially the pre-pubescent junk, does cause harm.  Coming down hard on the possession and viewing of it is intended to discourage the demand that leads to it being made.

a line of logic that has worked out well in the other areas it has been tried.

Yes and no.  Unlike those other areas, there is already a fairly small demand for pre-pubescent porn, there is no way to claim its production is at worst self-inflicted harm, and last but not least, the public support for treating all offenders harshly instead of a select subset of offenders is there.
Logged

My ballot:
Ervin(I) Gov.
Sellers(D) Lt. Gov.
Hammond(R) Sec. of State
Diggs(D) Att. Gen.
Herbert(D) Comptroller Gen.
Spearman(R) Supt. of Education
DeFelice(American) Commissioner of Agriculture
Hutto(D/Working Families) US Sen (full)
Scott(R) US Sen (special)
Geddings(Labor) US House SC-2
Quinn(R) SC House District 69
TBD: Lex 1 School Board
Yes: Am. 1 (allow charity raffles)
No: Am. 2 (end election of the Adj. General)
No: Local Sales Tax
Yes: Temp Beer/Wine Permits
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16060


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 08, 2012, 08:18:33 pm »
Ignore

What if you click on a link [or your browser clicks on one for you, as often happens] and it takes you to a child porn site and doesn't let you close the window, and then somebody happens to be walking by at that moment? Or what if you visit a site that secretly downloads material onto your hard drive without your knowledge? Sure, one might be acquitted in the above cases, but you could still be bankrupted by legal fees, lose your job, and be permanently tarred for life.
Logged

ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15862
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 08, 2012, 08:28:28 pm »
Ignore

What if you click on a link [or your browser clicks on one for you, as often happens] and it takes you to a child porn site and doesn't let you close the window, and then somebody happens to be walking by at that moment? Or what if you visit a site that secretly downloads material onto your hard drive without your knowledge? Sure, one might be acquitted in the above cases, but you could still be bankrupted by legal fees, lose your job, and be permanently tarred for life.
Or if your cat steps on your keyboard and downloads 10,000 images!
Logged

If a burial strikes my family as too practical, I'd go for either a viking funeral on one of the Great Lakes or to be sealed up in a tomb with my closest servants and bang-maids so they may wait on my every need in the afterlife.
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22986
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.48

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 08, 2012, 08:29:00 pm »
Ignore

Logged


i like girls but there is NOTHING better then a sexi hott dude
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16060


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 08, 2012, 08:31:03 pm »
Ignore

What if you click on a link [or your browser clicks on one for you, as often happens] and it takes you to a child porn site and doesn't let you close the window, and then somebody happens to be walking by at that moment? Or what if you visit a site that secretly downloads material onto your hard drive without your knowledge? Sure, one might be acquitted in the above cases, but you could still be bankrupted by legal fees, lose your job, and be permanently tarred for life.
Or if your cat steps on your keyboard and downloads 10,000 images!

An innocent person's life could be ruined by big government. I'm against that.
Logged

Governor Varavour
Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10826


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: 5.91

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 08, 2012, 08:46:40 pm »
Ignore

I wonder when we'll all agree something is bad.
Logged

tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35677
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.52, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 08, 2012, 08:48:27 pm »
Ignore

how about nationalizing child porn and allowing pedophiles to purchase it from the government at a nominal cost.  perhaps levy a sin tax on it.  harm reduction.
Logged

in a mirror, dimly lit
black and white band photos
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 72519
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 08, 2012, 09:41:58 pm »
Ignore

how about nationalizing child porn and allowing pedophiles to purchase it from the government at a nominal cost.  perhaps levy a sin tax on it.  harm reduction.

How is the child porn being sold by the government going to be produced?
Logged




01/05/2004-01/10/2014
Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13230
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: May 08, 2012, 10:02:42 pm »

This thread is quickly heading into soon-to-be-locked territory.
Logged

tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35677
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.52, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 08, 2012, 10:09:55 pm »
Ignore

how about nationalizing child porn and allowing pedophiles to purchase it from the government at a nominal cost.  perhaps levy a sin tax on it.  harm reduction.

How is the child porn being sold by the government going to be produced?

reproduce that which has already been produced.
Logged

in a mirror, dimly lit
Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13230
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: May 08, 2012, 10:17:56 pm »

And congratulations on sealing the deal, Tweed. Locked.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines