NC Passes Amendment One

[TJ in Oregon]

Clearly everyone who opposes gay marriage is a closet homosexual

[TJ in Oregon]

Not that it matters, since there are studies which suggest that most of you guys are closet homos, anyway.

Does that mean 30% of NC voters are closet homos?

[TJ in Oregon]

Not that it matters, since there are studies which suggest that most of you guys are closet homos, anyway.

Does that mean 30% of NC voters are closet homos?

It passed by 60%.

You said half, so I gave the lowest possible figure to interpret your statement as reasonably as possible.

[TJ in Oregon]

Not that it matters, since there are studies which suggest that most of you guys are closet homos, anyway.

Does that mean 30% of NC voters are closet homos?

It passed by 60%.

You said half, so I gave the lowest possible figure to interpret your statement as reasonably as possible.

Sure, then.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2126957/Homophobes-attracted-sex-study-finds.html

I've read the study before, but this doesn't match up with pretty much every other study on the percentage of the population that is homosexual.

Since popular opposition to gay marriage has collapsed over the last ten years, does this also mean the percentage of the population that are closeted homosexuals has also collapsed?

[TJ in Oregon]

Scott, the reason I'm pressing you on this is your response to every thread about gay marriage and every post against it is to:

1. Call the other person a bigot (or some other personal insult)
2. Call them a closeted homo (thus their opinion doesn't count)
3. Post it in the Ignorant/Absurd/Bad Post Thread

And you just posted something that is totally ridiculous: that at least 30% of NC voters are closeted homosexuals.

[TJ in Oregon]

LOL at Napoleon coming up with something to snidely attack me for

[TJ in Oregon]

How about "gay marriage opponents"? You know, something that gives as specific, accurate, objective description possible?

[TJ in Oregon]

How about "gay marriage opponents"? You know, something that gives as specific, accurate, objective description possible?

This wasn't just gay marriage. ""Opponents of existing same and opposite sex domestic partnerships" is more useful.

Even better! Explicit, accurate, something that isn't worded to project a certain viewpoint or advocate something.

[TJ in Oregon]

How about "gay marriage opponents"? You know, something that gives as specific, accurate, objective description possible?

Or "if straight, likely to be piss poor fathers". That is specific, accurate and objective about some.

Napoleon, don't you have something better to do that repeatedly come on here and insult me? Are you this big of a prick in real life too or is this an "it's the internet so I can just throw around insults as much as possible" thing? I know you're position is the popular one around here so you can get away with it and still be held in high regard on the forum, but must you be a jerk at everyone opportunity? You may be against anti-gay bullying but you're the biggest bully on this site.

[TJ in Oregon]

Shua, TJ isn't your regular gay marriage opponent. He is truly malicious about it.

Their partner would not be permitted to enter my house as a partner and my child would not be permitted to see his/her partner.

Anyway the amendment is, as jfern stated, about more than just marriage.

Funny that TJ says he would treat his own child like this, and calls me a bully.

Oh heaven forbid a parent have rules they expect their children to follow!? Imagine that!

[TJ in Oregon]

Shua, TJ isn't your regular gay marriage opponent. He is truly malicious about it.

Their partner would not be permitted to enter my house as a partner and my child would not be permitted to see his/her partner.

Anyway the amendment is, as jfern stated, about more than just marriage.

Funny that TJ says he would treat his own child like this, and calls me a bully.

Oh heaven forbid a parent have rules they expect their children to follow!? Imagine that!

Abuse = making rules, now?  Okay.

Not allowing a kid to have a gay relationship is not abuse that's a rule. If I used to to verbally attack my child or attempt to drive them into depression or lock them in their room indefinitely then it would be abuse. But I refuse to accept that expecting a child to live in sexual chastity under my own roof is abuse. That is not a concession I will ever make and if required you call the police and haul my butt into prison.