Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 26, 2014, 08:13:03 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: True Federalist, Former Moderate, Badger)
| | |-+  Obama endorses gay marriage.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Print
Author Topic: Obama endorses gay marriage.  (Read 2927 times)
oakvale
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9199
Palestinian Territory, Occupied
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

View Profile
« Reply #25 on: May 09, 2012, 04:55:55 pm »
Ignore


Of course he doesn't.
Logged

Seriously, go die in a ditch, anti-semitic scumbag.
They call me PR
Progressive Realist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5385
United States


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: May 09, 2012, 04:57:25 pm »
Ignore

Good. This is perhaps the most clear-cut, "black and white" issue to me.

It's simple: Gays should have all the rights that straights have. They don't currently.

Solution: Give them those rights legally.
Logged
NY Jew
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 544


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: May 09, 2012, 05:02:07 pm »
Ignore

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/05/will-obama-finally-endorse-gay-marriage-abc-news/52110/

Quote
“It’s interesting, some of this is also generational,” the president continued. “You know when I go to college campuses, sometimes I talk to college Republicans who think that I have terrible policies on the economy, on foreign policy, but are very clear that when it comes to same sex equality or, you know, sexual orientation that they believe in equality. They are much more comfortable with it.

You know, Malia and Sasha, they have friends whose parents are same-sex couples. There have been times where Michelle and I have been sitting around the dinner table and we’re talking about their friends and their parents and Malia and Sasha, it wouldn’t dawn on them that somehow their friends’ parents would be treated differently. It doesn’t make sense to them and frankly, that’s the kind of thing that prompts a change in perspective.”

Of course, polls showed that large majorities of Americans thought Obama support gay marriage anyway, so I doubt the political impact's as major as some were expecting - either positive or negative. Smiley
how come every single time it came to a vote it lost
Logged
NY Jew
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 544


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: May 09, 2012, 05:07:05 pm »
Ignore

Good. This is perhaps the most clear-cut, "black and white" issue to me.

It's simple: Gays should have all the rights that straights have. They don't currently.

Solution: Give them those rights legally.
yes they do, any gay can get married to a member of the opposite sex even in North Carolina.

gays obviously went to the Joseph Goebbels school of propaganda "if you repeat a lie often enough idiots will believe you".
Logged
Carlos Danger
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8404
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: May 09, 2012, 05:07:15 pm »
Ignore

how come every single time it came to a vote it lost

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=4&year=2006&f=0&off=50&elect=0
Logged

oakvale
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9199
Palestinian Territory, Occupied
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

View Profile
« Reply #30 on: May 09, 2012, 05:09:00 pm »
Ignore

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/05/will-obama-finally-endorse-gay-marriage-abc-news/52110/

Quote
“It’s interesting, some of this is also generational,” the president continued. “You know when I go to college campuses, sometimes I talk to college Republicans who think that I have terrible policies on the economy, on foreign policy, but are very clear that when it comes to same sex equality or, you know, sexual orientation that they believe in equality. They are much more comfortable with it.

You know, Malia and Sasha, they have friends whose parents are same-sex couples. There have been times where Michelle and I have been sitting around the dinner table and we’re talking about their friends and their parents and Malia and Sasha, it wouldn’t dawn on them that somehow their friends’ parents would be treated differently. It doesn’t make sense to them and frankly, that’s the kind of thing that prompts a change in perspective.”

Of course, polls showed that large majorities of Americans thought Obama support gay marriage anyway, so I doubt the political impact's as major as some were expecting - either positive or negative. Smiley
how come every single time it came to a vote it lost

That's not true, of course, but you knew that. Smiley

It's also not my point - the kind of people who turn out to vote on a gay marriage amendment are inherently going to be more conservative (and Republican) than those who turn out in a Presidential election - I doubt this is going to change many votes.
Logged

Seriously, go die in a ditch, anti-semitic scumbag.
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8103
United States


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: May 09, 2012, 05:09:52 pm »
Ignore

Good. This is perhaps the most clear-cut, "black and white" issue to me.

It's simple: Gays should have all the rights that straights have. They don't currently.

Solution: Give them those rights legally.
yes they do, any gay can get married to a member of the opposite sex even in North Carolina.

gays obviously went to the Joseph Goebbels school of propaganda "if you repeat a lie often enough idiots will believe you".

Oh shut up.
Logged
oakvale
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9199
Palestinian Territory, Occupied
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

View Profile
« Reply #32 on: May 09, 2012, 05:10:54 pm »
Ignore

Good. This is perhaps the most clear-cut, "black and white" issue to me.

It's simple: Gays should have all the rights that straights have. They don't currently.

Solution: Give them those rights legally.
yes they do, any gay can get married to a member of the opposite sex even in North Carolina.

Best post ever!

Logged

Seriously, go die in a ditch, anti-semitic scumbag.
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12721


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: May 09, 2012, 05:12:33 pm »
Ignore

Good. This is perhaps the most clear-cut, "black and white" issue to me.

It's simple: Gays should have all the rights that straights have. They don't currently.

Solution: Give them those rights legally.
yes they do, any gay can get married to a member of the opposite sex even in North Carolina.

gays obviously went to the Joseph Goebbels school of propaganda "if you repeat a lie often enough idiots will believe you".

Oh shut up.
Logged
Marokai Besieged
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16695
United States


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: May 09, 2012, 05:16:36 pm »
Ignore

I'm very glad he's finally said so publicly. For reasons BK stated in the thread about this on the 2012 board, I don't think this will be as damaging as some might think. I'm glad I have something to feel good about, with Obama, for a change.
Logged

Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13090
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #35 on: May 09, 2012, 05:26:22 pm »

A referendum banning gay marriage failed in Idaho in 1994 as well, though that one was certainly much further reaching in it's anti-gay rhetoric than any of its more modern cousins.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?fips=16&year=1994&f=0&off=61&elect=0
Logged

R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21742
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.55, S: -7.91

View Profile
« Reply #36 on: May 09, 2012, 05:48:46 pm »
Ignore

Today's headlines:

President Obama endorses gay marriage in a move his advisers call "not political."

Also in the news: Rick Santorum says he is "not gay."
Logged

They call me PR
Progressive Realist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5385
United States


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: May 09, 2012, 05:51:05 pm »
Ignore

As I said in another thread...

This may be Santorum's Republican Party. It sure as hell ain't Santorum's America. And Romney is in between a rock and a hard place between moderately conservative Independents and the rabid religious right (aka much of the GOP electorate).
Logged
Purch
Full Member
***
Posts: 196


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: May 09, 2012, 06:22:16 pm »
Ignore

Good. This is perhaps the most clear-cut, "black and white" issue to me.

It's simple: Gays should have all the rights that straights have. They don't currently.

Solution: Give them those rights legally.
yes they do, any gay can get married to a member of the opposite sex even in North Carolina.

gays obviously went to the Joseph Goebbels school of propaganda "if you repeat a lie often enough idiots will believe you".

Even though I'm pro gay marriage there is some truth to the statement you made. Personally I think gay rights is a struggle over the need to re-define marriage ( Which I feel the traditional man and women only thing is outdated). Personally when I think of a Civil rights issue I thinnk of an issue in which the majority of the people have a right whiles a minority is denied these rights, Think African American's not being allowed to vote whiles white Americans were. However no man in America(Well before states voted on it) black/white/Hispanic/Asian had the right to marry someone of their own sex so I don't really see how it's defined as a civil rights. If it was a civil rights issue I feel someone(The majority) would have to have the rights to marry their own sex and that majority would have to be denying a minority that same right but that's not the case.

Anyhow we're in 2012 and we need to redefine marrige, If Gay couples wanna be miserable like half the people who get married why not?
Logged

Those gravestones don't say democrat or republican those gravestones say American.
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29655
United States
View Profile
« Reply #39 on: May 09, 2012, 06:26:23 pm »
Ignore

Even though I'm pro gay marriage there is some truth to the statement you made. Personally I think gay rights is a struggle over the need to re-define marriage ( Which I feel the traditional man and women only thing is outdated). Personally when I think of a Civil rights issue I thinnk of an issue in which the majority of the people have a right whiles a minority is denied these rights, Think African American's not being allowed to vote whiles white Americans were. However no man in America(Well before states voted on it) black/white/Hispanic/Asian had the right to marry someone of their own sex so I don't really see how it's defined as a civil rights. If it was a civil rights issue I feel someone(The majority) would have to have the rights to marry their own sex and that majority would have to be denying a minority that same right but that's not the case.

Anyhow we're in 2012 and we need to redefine marrige, If Gay couples wanna be miserable like half the people who get married why not?

Doesn't your definition preclude interracial marriage being a civil right, too?

This seems semantic to me -- wrong is wrong, no matter the definitions of the wrong -- but just saying.
« Last Edit: May 09, 2012, 06:28:48 pm by Alcon »Logged

n/c
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35386
United States
View Profile
« Reply #40 on: May 09, 2012, 06:33:00 pm »
Ignore

the only interesting question I can think of: was Biden's comment a 'teaser' for the already-planned real thing, or was it an off-the-cuff thing that led the Obama camp to the decision that it would be easier to just cut all the threads now rather than try to backtrack and piss off LGBT donors and orgs and etc?
Logged
Purch
Full Member
***
Posts: 196


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: May 09, 2012, 06:34:18 pm »
Ignore

Even though I'm pro gay marriage there is some truth to the statement you made. Personally I think gay rights is a struggle over the need to re-define marriage ( Which I feel the traditional man and women only thing is outdated). Personally when I think of a Civil rights issue I thinnk of an issue in which the majority of the people have a right whiles a minority is denied these rights, Think African American's not being allowed to vote whiles white Americans were. However no man in America(Well before states voted on it) black/white/Hispanic/Asian had the right to marry someone of their own sex so I don't really see how it's defined as a civil rights. If it was a civil rights issue I feel someone(The majority) would have to have the rights to marry their own sex and that majority would have to be denying a minority that same right but that's not the case.

Anyhow we're in 2012 and we need to redefine marrige, If Gay couples wanna be miserable like half the people who get married why not?

Doesn't your definition preclude interracial marriage being a civil right, too?

This seems semantic to me -- wrong is wrong, no matter the definitions of the wrong -- but just saying.
Yes because to my knowledge no one else in the country had the right to legally marry someone of another race. But I feel the Loving v. Virginia decision redefined marriage to mean a union between two consenting adults regardless of race.  That's kind of where I think the gay rights issue should be heading to a place where Marriage is redefined as a union between two consenting adults regardless of sex.


O no doubt it's definitly semantics but I'm strict with what I classify as Civil rights issues.. Doesn't mean it isn't less wrong to deny them their pursuit of happiness.
« Last Edit: May 09, 2012, 06:36:22 pm by Purch »Logged

Those gravestones don't say democrat or republican those gravestones say American.
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29655
United States
View Profile
« Reply #42 on: May 09, 2012, 06:35:50 pm »
Ignore

Even though I'm pro gay marriage there is some truth to the statement you made. Personally I think gay rights is a struggle over the need to re-define marriage ( Which I feel the traditional man and women only thing is outdated). Personally when I think of a Civil rights issue I thinnk of an issue in which the majority of the people have a right whiles a minority is denied these rights, Think African American's not being allowed to vote whiles white Americans were. However no man in America(Well before states voted on it) black/white/Hispanic/Asian had the right to marry someone of their own sex so I don't really see how it's defined as a civil rights. If it was a civil rights issue I feel someone(The majority) would have to have the rights to marry their own sex and that majority would have to be denying a minority that same right but that's not the case.

Anyhow we're in 2012 and we need to redefine marrige, If Gay couples wanna be miserable like half the people who get married why not?

Doesn't your definition preclude interracial marriage being a civil right, too?

Yes because to my knowledge no one else in the country had the right to legally marry someone of another race. But I feel the Loving v. Virginia decision redefined marriage to mean a union between two consenting adults regardless of race.  That's kind of where I think the gay rights issue should be heading to a place where Marriage is redefined as a union between two consenting adults regardless of sex.

That's fair.
Logged

n/c
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21556
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #43 on: May 09, 2012, 06:57:04 pm »
Ignore

It's good that Obama is finally (sort of) clear on the subject.  The trip here was ridiculous though.
Logged

Quote from:   Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
NY Jew
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 544


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: May 09, 2012, 07:15:28 pm »
Ignore

I didn't realize that marriage was also on that one besides uncivil unions.
but I guess since it passed a few years later means that more people are becoming against this perversion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_Proposition_102_%282008%29
Logged
Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13090
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #45 on: May 09, 2012, 07:22:54 pm »

I didn't realize that marriage was also on that one besides uncivil unions.
but I guess since it passed a few years later means that more people are becoming against this perversion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_Proposition_102_%282008%29

I'd be careful with the "perversion" talk — that's starting to drift into infractable territory. And the moderator who patrols these boards is very biased when it comes to gay issues.
Logged

Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6907
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: May 09, 2012, 07:29:11 pm »
Ignore

Straights are more likely to vote against anti-gay amendments if there might be consequences for them! Who knew?
Logged

NY Jew
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 544


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: May 09, 2012, 07:43:50 pm »
Ignore

I didn't realize that marriage was also on that one besides uncivil unions.
but I guess since it passed a few years later means that more people are becoming against this perversion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_Proposition_102_%282008%29

I'd be careful with the "perversion" talk — that's starting to drift into infractable territory. And the moderator who patrols these boards is very biased when it comes to gay issues.
so I can be called a bigot for thinking that immoral and harmful behavior should be banned and even more so not be encouraged (which is what being allowed to "marry" would do)

I guess liberals are the least tolerant people in the world.
Logged
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29655
United States
View Profile
« Reply #48 on: May 09, 2012, 09:14:02 pm »
Ignore

Right NY Jew...they oppose "immoral, perverted behavior" but defeated a vote to disallow the "immoral perverts" to have domestic partnership rights.  A lot of people are ambivalent about the gay marriage issue -- as a public policy matter, that's unfathomable to me, but whatever -- but your specific issue has been out of the mainstream for years.  Best of luck.
Logged

n/c
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32026
United States


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: May 09, 2012, 09:35:41 pm »
Ignore

Right NY Jew...they oppose "immoral, perverted behavior" but defeated a vote to disallow the "immoral perverts" to have domestic partnership rights.  A lot of people are ambivalent about the gay marriage issue -- as a public policy matter, that's unfathomable to me, but whatever -- but your specific issue has been out of the mainstream for years.  Best of luck.

I think the latest polling was 50-48, so it's not mainstream.

It will cost Obama a few states, NC, maybe VA and OH.
Logged

J. J.

"Actually, .. now that you mention it...." 
- Londo Molari

"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke

"Wa sala, wa lala."

(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines