What These 2012 Fabricated "Culture War" Distractions Really Are... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:17:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  What These 2012 Fabricated "Culture War" Distractions Really Are... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What These 2012 Fabricated "Culture War" Distractions Really Are...  (Read 1050 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


« on: May 12, 2012, 09:16:01 AM »

Let's just call it like it is: Anybody who is energized by Obama's recent announcement is simply a useful idiot who is being duped by a distraction. Why don't they stop and wonder for a moment why Obama did not make this announcement one, two or three years ago. It's not a coincidence that Obama and Biden "changed" their mind on this issue just this past week, shortly after Mitt Romney clinched the GOP nomination and is starting to gain traction with a slowing economy (Seen the jobs report for April? Seen the situation in Europe? How about JPMorgan's $2 billion loss out of Britain?). Some people need to stop and ask themselves why they are supporting politicians who have politicized a sensitive issue in the exact same disgusting fashion as George W. Bush eight years ago, albeit in the opposite direction. Why do some people like being used with little to show for it?

Maybe it was because the economy was in such bad shape that gay rights were much less important. Maybe it is because people were less accepting of LGBT rights. Maybe it was because the President had a huge legislative agenda (including the Affordable Health Care Act). The American public now supports gay rights by a larger margin than ever and that is unlikely to diminish.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

"Gay marriage" is not a distraction from the economy. It is an inexorable trend not worthy of resistance. But if the focus of the campaign becomes "whatever President Obama is for I am against", then it is Mitt Romney who falls for the distraction.

I know what you think about the economy -- that President Obama has done everything to impede the 'progress' of America toward a New Feudalism and is thus evil. LGBT rights, like civil rights for ethnic minorities in the past, will not hurt economic progress. But this may show Mitt Romney as nothing more than opposition to an effective President. 

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Congratulations!
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2012, 05:55:19 PM »

It is a question of when support for one side or the other on this issue goes from daring to iffy to irresistible that the change in political norm occurs.  The states going for gay rights are the ones with the clearest pattern of liberal voting. In 2010 the Republicans ensured that there would be no progress on the recognition of LGBT rights. As state legislatures flip even Scott Walker (should he avoid being ousted) will know which way the wind is blowing. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.