Rise of the 3rd Party
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2024, 01:48:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Rise of the 3rd Party
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: In which decade would a third party be most likely to win a national election?
#1
2010's
 
#2
2020's
 
#3
2030's
 
#4
2040's
 
#5
2050's
 
#6
later
 
#7
never
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 32

Author Topic: Rise of the 3rd Party  (Read 2224 times)
They put it to a vote and they just kept lying
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,149
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 05, 2012, 01:29:09 PM »

Go.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,503
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2012, 02:26:56 PM »

Barring the cataclysmic, it will never happen.  We are going to be stuck with Republicans and Democrats for the forseeable future, though they may well be increasingly unrecognizable as the decades wear on.    
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,417
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2012, 02:33:37 PM »

Unfortunately, it'll never happen. The American political system is designed to prevent it.
Logged
The Ex-Factor
xfactor99
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,241
Viet Nam


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2012, 08:10:53 PM »

Something more nationally cataclysmic than the Civil War?
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2012, 08:41:53 PM »

Partisan hack version: 2012. Gary Johnson.

Non-hack: Probably in 30-40 years.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,039
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2012, 09:52:04 PM »

Unless we change the electoral system, the only way a third party can rise is if they replace one of the two major parties.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2012, 09:57:21 PM »

Unless we change the electoral system, the only way a third party can rise is if they replace one of the two major parties.

I could see the Rs imploding in a few decades if they stay as they are.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 06, 2012, 12:12:57 AM »

IT WON'T HAPPEN AS LONG AS THE UNITED STATES USES FPTP
It will only happen if the United States adopts proportional representation.  And it's hard to say when such a thing will happen.  Certainly you'll start to see minor parties make inroads into government, but the rise of a new party to major party status is one of those events that just pop out of nowhere.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,417
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 06, 2012, 01:45:39 PM »

IT WON'T HAPPEN AS LONG AS THE UNITED STATES USES FPTP
It will only happen if the United States adopts proportional representation.  And it's hard to say when such a thing will happen.  Certainly you'll start to see minor parties make inroads into government, but the rise of a new party to major party status is one of those events that just pop out of nowhere.

Not necessarily true. Canada has FPTP and the NDP (which was a fourth party recently) just became Official Opposition and in Australia, they use a form of PR, but they're really just a two party state as well.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 07, 2012, 09:18:34 AM »

Never going to happen. You have a better shot at taking over and ideologically instituting a 'new regime' in either the Democrats or the Republicans than you do creating a successful third party.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 07, 2012, 12:51:51 PM »

IT WON'T HAPPEN AS LONG AS THE UNITED STATES USES FPTP
It will only happen if the United States adopts proportional representation.  And it's hard to say when such a thing will happen.  Certainly you'll start to see minor parties make inroads into government, but the rise of a new party to major party status is one of those events that just pop out of nowhere.

Not necessarily true. Canada has FPTP and the NDP (which was a fourth party recently) just became Official Opposition and in Australia, they use a form of PR, but they're really just a two party state as well.

Canada and the UK (and Australia) are weird cases.  In the U.S. though, you're unlikely to even have a little party like the Lib Dems that constantly decides the balance of power.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 07, 2012, 11:26:31 PM »

Partisan hack version: 2012. Gary Johnson.

Non-hack: Probably in 30-40 years.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,127
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2012, 04:35:03 PM »

Well, to get a third party we would need a large demographic of people who are not represented by either of the current parties AND who are politically conscious enough to know it.  I'm not sure what could prompt that.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,562
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 14, 2012, 04:46:19 PM »

The way to build a third party in the US is to do what the Greens are currently doing in Canada, the UK, and Australia -- pick a single seat. Elect somebody. The next election, keep that seat and elect somebody new. Slowly expand until you have a balance of power (like the LibDems do in the UK) at which point you should usually be big enough to survive a bad election and you can start behaving like a top-two party. (The 'you don't have to be careful anymore once you have the BOP', due to various reasons, has generally not been true in Australia, but in purer FPTP nations like the US, Canada, and the UK is usually the case). You can go ahead and run prominent people for the Presidency, but the mistake third parties make is focusing on that. Initially, when you have nothing, the focus should be on House seats.

There isn't much stopping the US from a system with a great deal of parties besides tradition and really stupid third parties. When a smart third party with an attractive ideology comes along, it will succeed. (I may actually try and do an AH timeline about Greens in the US in the late '90s, when they were popular, becoming a more successful party by focusing on House seats.)
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,043
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: August 14, 2012, 08:31:35 PM »

The way to build a third party in the US is to do what the Greens are currently doing in Canada, the UK, and Australia -- pick a single seat. Elect somebody. The next election, keep that seat and elect somebody new. Slowly expand until you have a balance of power (like the LibDems do in the UK) at which point you should usually be big enough to survive a bad election and you can start behaving like a top-two party. (The 'you don't have to be careful anymore once you have the BOP', due to various reasons, has generally not been true in Australia, but in purer FPTP nations like the US, Canada, and the UK is usually the case). You can go ahead and run prominent people for the Presidency, but the mistake third parties make is focusing on that. Initially, when you have nothing, the focus should be on House seats.

There isn't much stopping the US from a system with a great deal of parties besides tradition and really stupid third parties. When a smart third party with an attractive ideology comes along, it will succeed. (I may actually try and do an AH timeline about Greens in the US in the late '90s, when they were popular, becoming a more successful party by focusing on House seats.)
I want to read that Smiley
Logged
Foucaulf
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,050
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2012, 08:33:59 PM »

A house seat would be all but pointless in the American system. It's a heavy investment as it is, and unlike Commonwealth legislatures there is no procedure for one party to gain its own funding, not to mention all floor votes being decided within the majority party (Correct me if I'm wrong on this) It's a better investment of a candidate's time to run in the primaries and join a caucus once he's elected.

A senate seat could be significant, but the money investment is so massive that the party would become a senator's reelection vehicle.

The problem is no third party, if it wants to be a viable player, wants to even bother on the national level: too much money involved. Nor can one of the party's wings try to split off, because then they're cut off to the two parties' fundraising network.

PR matters less than most people think. Campaign finance reform is number one by far, followed by a federal fusion voting system. If those are put in place a third party could claw its way up in the 2040s.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.24 seconds with 16 queries.