PMRC: Opinion of the political party reform

[Simfan34]

The reforms in question are the dissolution of the JCP and RPP.

[For Oklahoma]

Things are about the same and have not been successful. The Liberal Party has assumed the role of the JCP, the Labour is the UDL, the Whig is the RPP and the IB is basically SPA.

[dialectical fetishist]

Better, but not successful.

[Senator Napoleon]

How has the Liberal Party assumed the role of the JCP?

I voted against dissolution but I think the party structure is better now. Obviously it would be nice if the parties were ideological but I don't need to go there.

[Senator Napoleon]

Success is relative. I think there was a general desire to replace the previous power structures, perhaps even more among the previous power structures at least on the JCP side. I am having a lot more fun in the game without the RPP attack machine making things unpleasant; we have a much more positive attitude on both sides.

[oakvale]

How quickly you seem to have forgotten just how stagnant the old structure was. Dissolution was always going to be a step forward, not a magical cure-all.

[For Oklahoma]

How has the Liberal Party assumed the role of the JCP?

Dominant left-of-center party, some libertarians/right wingers.

[Senator Napoleon]

How quickly you seem to have forgotten just how stagnant the old structure was. Dissolution was always going to be a step forward, not a magical cure-all.

Says the Independent.

[Senator Napoleon]

How has the Liberal Party assumed the role of the JCP?

Dominant left-of-center party, some libertarians/right wingers.

Well we are derived from the Liberal Caucus...that is about it.

[For Oklahoma]

How has the Liberal Party assumed the role of the JCP?

Dominant left-of-center party, some libertarians/right wingers.

Well we are derived from the Liberal Caucus...that is about it.

¯\_(ツ)_ /¯

[Secretary Polnut]

There isn't the same kind of homogeneous globs of parties... I mean there are still mixes that don't necessarily make a lot of sense... but I think it will make the Presidential races interesting for the near future.

[For Oklahoma]

There isn't the same kind of homogeneous globs of parties... I mean there are still mixes that don't necessarily make a lot of sense... but I think it will make the Presidential races interesting for the near future.

Totally.

[ZuWo]

Things are better and dissolution has been a success - for now. But in order to remain on a good track we need to make sure that the new parties remain ideologically identifiable and don't become big-tent parties.

This is why I've hoped (and am still hoping) that a center-right party appears which complements the Whig Party. Sort of like the Moderate Party, just with more active leaders who are willing to bring the party forward.

[HappyWarrior]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

[ZuWo]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Let's see ... you seem to be too liberal for the Whig Party, at least on economic issues (on the other hand if you're pro-life the Whig Party is not a bad fit for you). You are too conservative on social issues for the Liberal Party ... the Imperial Bloc is for Southerners only, the Moderate Party, like the Popular Liberty Party, is almost non-existent. Maybe Labor? They seem to focus more on economic than on social issues. And you are pretty left economically, aren't you?

[pillage the village, trash the scene]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Join the Whigs man! We got cookies!

[HappyWarrior]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Let's see ... you seem to be too liberal for the Whig Party, at least on economic issues (on the other hand if you're pro-life the Whig Party is not a bad fit for you). You are too conservative on social issues for the Liberal Party ... the Imperial Bloc is for Southerners only, the Moderate Party, like the Popular Liberty Party, is almost non-existent. Maybe Labor? They seem to focus more on economic than on social issues. And you are pretty left economically, aren't you?

Sounds about right.  I'll wait to hear from a representative from their party :-p

[Senator Napoleon]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Let's see ... you seem to be too liberal for the Whig Party, at least on economic issues (on the other hand if you're pro-life the Whig Party is not a bad fit for you). You are too conservative on social issues for the Liberal Party ... the Imperial Bloc is for Southerners only, the Moderate Party, like the Popular Liberty Party, is almost non-existent. Maybe Labor? They seem to focus more on economic than on social issues. And you are pretty left economically, aren't you?

Sounds about right.  I'll wait to hear from a representative from their party :-p

Otoh your closer to the average Liberals econ score than the farther left Labor Party that has no members in the Mideast.   There isn't much difference on social issues, on the surface. We have champagne!

[Emperor SJoyce]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Let's see ... you seem to be too liberal for the Whig Party, at least on economic issues (on the other hand if you're pro-life the Whig Party is not a bad fit for you). You are too conservative on social issues for the Liberal Party ... the Imperial Bloc is for Southerners only, the Moderate Party, like the Popular Liberty Party, is almost non-existent. Maybe Labor? They seem to focus more on economic than on social issues. And you are pretty left economically, aren't you?

We don't restrict membership to just Southerners, it's a party for promoting the interests of the South, so he could join the IB.

[Simfan34]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Let's see ... you seem to be too liberal for the Whig Party, at least on economic issues (on the other hand if you're pro-life the Whig Party is not a bad fit for you). You are too conservative on social issues for the Liberal Party ... the Imperial Bloc is for Southerners only, the Moderate Party, like the Popular Liberty Party, is almost non-existent. Maybe Labor? They seem to focus more on economic than on social issues. And you are pretty left economically, aren't you?

I'd like to say that the Whig party is considerably more social-conservative than it is economic-conservative, at least through my intention.

[ZuWo]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Let's see ... you seem to be too liberal for the Whig Party, at least on economic issues (on the other hand if you're pro-life the Whig Party is not a bad fit for you). You are too conservative on social issues for the Liberal Party ... the Imperial Bloc is for Southerners only, the Moderate Party, like the Popular Liberty Party, is almost non-existent. Maybe Labor? They seem to focus more on economic than on social issues. And you are pretty left economically, aren't you?

I'd like to say that the Whig party is considerably more social-conservative than it is economic-conservative, at least through my intention.

Both the average social and economic score are clearly on the plus side, for what it's worth. But you raise an important point, we have to specify our economic platform in our party thread.

[Simfan34]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Let's see ... you seem to be too liberal for the Whig Party, at least on economic issues (on the other hand if you're pro-life the Whig Party is not a bad fit for you). You are too conservative on social issues for the Liberal Party ... the Imperial Bloc is for Southerners only, the Moderate Party, like the Popular Liberty Party, is almost non-existent. Maybe Labor? They seem to focus more on economic than on social issues. And you are pretty left economically, aren't you?

We don't restrict membership to just Southerners, it's a party for promoting the interests of the South, so he could join the IB.

But why would he want to do that? But ultimately the Whigs are a broad-based party.

[Emperor SJoyce]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

Let's see ... you seem to be too liberal for the Whig Party, at least on economic issues (on the other hand if you're pro-life the Whig Party is not a bad fit for you). You are too conservative on social issues for the Liberal Party ... the Imperial Bloc is for Southerners only, the Moderate Party, like the Popular Liberty Party, is almost non-existent. Maybe Labor? They seem to focus more on economic than on social issues. And you are pretty left economically, aren't you?

We don't restrict membership to just Southerners, it's a party for promoting the interests of the South, so he could join the IB.

But why would he want to do that? But ultimately the Whigs are a broad-based party.

Well, he is in Maryland, which while not part of the IDS is considered Southern under certain definitions.

[Insula Dei]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

You should join the Rally for the Republic.

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

I still don't know anything about any of these new parties, hence why I remain an independent.

You should join the Rally for the Republic.