Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 25, 2014, 12:00:30 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  History (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  What were the most evil nations in history?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: What were the most evil nations in history?  (Read 3840 times)
A.G. Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16925
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -8.06, S: -4.96

View Profile
« on: May 19, 2012, 05:30:59 pm »
Ignore

Obviously most people's first instinct would be to say "Nazi Germany". But the more I think of it, the more accurate this list seems to be:

10. The Ottoman Empire
9. The Spanish Empire
8. The People's Republic of China
7. Confederate States of America
6. Belgium (under Leopold II)
5. Democratic Kampuchea
4. Soviet Union
3. Imperial Japan
2. Nazi Germany
1. The British Empire

The criteria were:

  • Body counts, of course, but not just the numbers. The percentage of a population killed and the reasons for doing so also counted
  • The reasons for founding the particular entity; this probably boosted the CSA, for instance.
  • Wars of aggression, including their scale and motivation.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2012, 12:54:51 am by Snowstalker »Logged
Scottish Robb Stark
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30158
France


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2012, 05:45:11 pm »
Ignore

A nation is neither good nor evil. It's really the regime and the rulers which matter.
Logged



Robb of the House Stark, First of his Name, Lord of Winterfell and King in the North



Quote from: IRC
22:15   ComradeSibboleth   this is all extremely terrible and in all respects absolutely fycking dire.

"A reformist is someone who realizes that, when you bang your head on a wall, it's the head that breaks rather than the wall."

Peppino, from the movie Baaria
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27781
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2012, 06:21:31 pm »

Democratic Kampuchea is clearly number one.  When you kill so many people even other evil nations turn against you, you realize that even evil has standards.

As for the CSA, that shouldn't even make the top fifty.  Slavery isn't the worst of evils, and the form of slavery practiced in the CSA wasn't  the worst, tho it wasn't the best either.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
A.G. Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16925
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -8.06, S: -4.96

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2012, 06:37:12 pm »
Ignore

A nation is neither good nor evil. It's really the regime and the rulers which matter.

Okay, regimes.

The CSA was on there entirely because it was formed for the sole purpose of keeping slavery alive.

And a bit surprised at the lack of a sh**tstorm over my #1 choice. Tongue
Logged
Sibboleth Bist
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56202
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2012, 08:48:42 pm »
Ignore

I'd write something abusive, but this thread is so mind-numbingly stupid that there's really no point. Please delete yourself from the internets.
Logged

A.G. Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16925
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -8.06, S: -4.96

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2012, 10:39:52 pm »
Ignore

I'd write something abusive, but this thread is so mind-numbingly stupid that there's really no point. Please delete yourself from the internets.

Ah, I knew I'd piss off a Brit.
Logged
Passing Through a Screen Door
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 71860
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2012, 11:05:56 pm »
Ignore

Where's the Ottoman Empire?
Logged

Victory over Inks dedicated in memory.


01/05/2004-01/10/2014
The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14376


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2012, 12:08:45 am »
Ignore

This is a terrible thread.
Logged

Einzige is a poltroon who cowardly turns down duel challenges he should be honor-bound to accept. The Code Duello authorizes you to mock and belittle such a pathetic honorless scoundrel.
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27781
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2012, 12:51:12 am »

This is a terrible thread.

No, it is an evil thread.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
A.G. Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16925
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -8.06, S: -4.96

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2012, 12:53:28 am »
Ignore

Where's the Ottoman Empire?

Dammit.
Logged
Lettuce Gay Bacon and Tomato
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5813
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2012, 01:33:36 am »
Ignore

North Korea? 2000-Present United States?
Logged

Convincing BRTD to drop the Sneakers O'Toole BS is like convincing Sneakers O'Toole to take his sneakers off.

(I realize I'm probably just further encouraging him by saying that, and for this I apologize.)
ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14756
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2012, 01:38:41 am »
Ignore

I'd put Mao's China up high.
Logged

America's like that hot chick everyone wants, and illegal immigrants are all the nerds that she should say "no" to.
--
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36851
View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 20, 2012, 10:44:24 am »
Ignore

This thread is bad and you should feel at least as bad as John Wayne Bobbitt.
Logged
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21729
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.55, S: -7.91

View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 20, 2012, 11:12:48 am »
Ignore

I'd write something abusive, but this thread is so mind-numbingly stupid that there's really no point. Please delete yourself from the internets.

Ah, I knew I'd piss off a Brit.

You didn't piss off a Brit, you pissed off Al.
Logged

Iron King SJoyce
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8786
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2012, 11:13:24 am »
Ignore

Uzbekistan. They boil people. Then the U.S. pays them lots of money, the U.S. can use their airport to invade other nations ending in -stan, and they can buy larger man-boiling pots. Wonderful cycle.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2012, 02:48:04 pm by Secretary of External Affairs SJoyceFla »Logged

Mechaman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13698
Jamaica


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 20, 2012, 11:27:52 am »
Ignore

The Assyrian Empire.

THEY ATE BABIES!
Logged

R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21729
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.55, S: -7.91

View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 20, 2012, 01:27:26 pm »
Ignore

The Assyrian Empire.

THEY ATE BABIES!

Freedom empire.
Logged

Senator bore
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2266
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: May 20, 2012, 01:33:43 pm »
Ignore

Obviously most people's first instinct would be to say "Nazi Germany". But the more I think of it, the more accurate this list seems to be:

10. The Ottoman Empire
9. The Spanish Empire
8. The People's Republic of China
7. Confederate States of America
6. Belgium (under Leopold II)
5. Democratic Kampuchea
4. Soviet Union
3. Imperial Japan
2. Nazi Germany
1. The British Empire

The criteria were:

  • Body counts, of course, but not just the numbers. The percentage of a population killed and the reasons for doing so also counted
  • The reasons for founding the particular entity; this probably boosted the CSA, for instance.
  • Wars of aggression, including their scale and motivation.

I'm completely baffled how anyone could say the British Empire was worse than Nazi Germany, especially using the criteria you used. If I were a cynic I would say you just did that to try and get an enraged reaction, because I can't see any other plausible reason.
Logged
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15677
United States Minor Outlying Islands


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: May 20, 2012, 02:31:29 pm »
Ignore

If I were a cynic I would say you just did that to try and get an enraged reaction

Logged

BK without all the crazy drugs just wouldn't be BK.
Bacon King: 1.  You're cute, in a weird Tom Wopat kind of way.
A.G. Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16925
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -8.06, S: -4.96

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: May 20, 2012, 03:45:58 pm »
Ignore

Obviously most people's first instinct would be to say "Nazi Germany". But the more I think of it, the more accurate this list seems to be:

10. The Ottoman Empire
9. The Spanish Empire
8. The People's Republic of China
7. Confederate States of America
6. Belgium (under Leopold II)
5. Democratic Kampuchea
4. Soviet Union
3. Imperial Japan
2. Nazi Germany
1. The British Empire

The criteria were:

  • Body counts, of course, but not just the numbers. The percentage of a population killed and the reasons for doing so also counted
  • The reasons for founding the particular entity; this probably boosted the CSA, for instance.
  • Wars of aggression, including their scale and motivation.

I'm completely baffled how anyone could say the British Empire was worse than Nazi Germany, especially using the criteria you used. If I were a cynic I would say you just did that to try and get an enraged reaction, because I can't see any other plausible reason.

500 years of conquest and slaughter>6 years of conquest and slaughter.

Who invented concentration camps? The British, in their conquest of the Boer states.
Logged
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15677
United States Minor Outlying Islands


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: May 20, 2012, 04:33:00 pm »
Ignore

Obviously most people's first instinct would be to say "Nazi Germany". But the more I think of it, the more accurate this list seems to be:

10. The Ottoman Empire
9. The Spanish Empire
8. The People's Republic of China
7. Confederate States of America
6. Belgium (under Leopold II)
5. Democratic Kampuchea
4. Soviet Union
3. Imperial Japan
2. Nazi Germany
1. The British Empire

The criteria were:

  • Body counts, of course, but not just the numbers. The percentage of a population killed and the reasons for doing so also counted
  • The reasons for founding the particular entity; this probably boosted the CSA, for instance.
  • Wars of aggression, including their scale and motivation.

I'm completely baffled how anyone could say the British Empire was worse than Nazi Germany, especially using the criteria you used. If I were a cynic I would say you just did that to try and get an enraged reaction, because I can't see any other plausible reason.

500 years of conquest and slaughter>6 years of conquest and slaughter.

Who invented concentration camps? The British, in their conquest of the Boer states.

Okay, hell, I'll bite.

First, the British didn't invent concentration camps. Before the Boer war, the Russians used similar strategies to deal with Polish rebels; the Spanish used them in Cuba; the United States used comparable camps when relocating Native Americans and definitely used outright concentration camps in the occupation of the Philippines.

However, the comparison of these concentration camps (though they were atrocious in themselves) to Nazi Germany's nation-wide system of facilities explicitly intended to conduct murder on a massive scale is simply disingenuous.

Furthermore, while British colonial policies were pretty bad in a lot of ways, I don't see how it compares in the slightest to Nazi Germany's utterly evil nature. Come on: blatant genocide, horrible oppression, ambitions to eventually enslave or murder every single person who wasn't a regime-supporting Aryan. Sure, the British Empire has some bad marks, but what did they do that is anywhere nearly as bad as that?
Logged

BK without all the crazy drugs just wouldn't be BK.
Bacon King: 1.  You're cute, in a weird Tom Wopat kind of way.
Sibboleth Bist
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56202
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: May 20, 2012, 04:37:13 pm »
Ignore

Not that I want to get involved in this thread in anything other than a sneering capacity, but note that the use of 'concentration camps' in the context of the Holocaust is a euphemism. And a disgusting one, actually.
Logged

patrick1
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7492


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: May 20, 2012, 05:12:07 pm »
Ignore

Obviously not a fan of the British Empire but this is pretty laughable. While facets and some actions were evil by today's standards and a smaller number by the standards of the time, a lot of the "evil" results came from neglect, disease, commercial exploitation, and a sharply crafted divide and conquer strategy that made the subjected complicit in their own demise. There were also quite a few positive develops from the Empire. What did the Nazis do good at all, the Autobahn?

Comrade Al Sibboleth, I know you do want to stick around the muck here, but your mention of the euphemism made me curious.  Growing up in history class I never remember hearing about extermination camps or really even death camps. It was only taught as concentration camps. Any idea when these more accurate (for Auschwitz, Sobibor etc) terms gained traction. 
Logged
Carlos Danger
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8404
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: May 20, 2012, 06:45:13 pm »
Ignore

The State.  Not really important what it chooses to call itself.
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11160
Russian Federation


View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: May 20, 2012, 08:08:27 pm »
Ignore

If nothing else, the fact that the British Empire nearly singlehandedly killed the transoceanic slave trade in the early 19th century should keep them off the top stop.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines