Do you disable signatures?

[Senator Napoleon]

No, I have signatures on.

[Senator Clarence]

Not sure what you mean...so I assume "no"' ;-)

[Chareth Cutestory]

Absolutely. I flipped the switch like 4 years ago and haven't looked back since.

[Smid]

I like reading witty signatures and the like, but flicked it off a couple of years back because there were too many large pics in people's signature blocks.

[Redalgo]

No, I have signatures on.

[Bacon King]

Yep

[Χahar]

I turned off signatures years ago; after I did, I wondered why I hadn't done it years before.

[Fmr. Emperor PiT]

     Yep. The forum is so much easier to read now.

[Diabolical Minds Think Alike]

No. I like signatures, it helps me learn more about who a poster is. Cheesy, I know, but whatever.

[opebo]

Heck no!  They're one of the... shall we say better functioning... methods of communication left to us.  Those and our user-names.

[Joe Republic]

I can't even remember what I have in mine, if anything.

[Grumps]

I can't even remember what I have in mine, if anything.

Not much

Quote from: Bacon King on July 09, 2011, 01:38:46 pm
Are you a fourteen year old that's obnoxiously oblivious to the world?
Your nemesis will be Joe Republic.

R-NV?!  W-TF??  

[Torie]

I found the signatures so distracting and traumatic initially, that after I signed up for the Forum, I didn't post for a year or two except for a couple maybe. And then I bitched, and someone told me how to turn them off, and then I started posting.. Yes, whomever told me how to turn them off should be perma-banned no doubt about it.

Now however I am used to them, and really hardly see them anymore, and turned them on a couple of years ago. The mind adapts. In fact, it is kind of an interesting case study really. Maybe it should be written up in some neurological journal or something.

[Big DaddyTX]

I turned signatures off about 2 or 3 years ago. Of course, I'm sure I still have a signature up on mine. It makes this forum so much easier to read. I came on once without logging in from a friends computer, and man it was annoying! All the people who have some huge pictures, or annoying gifs.. I don't think I'd ever turn them back on at this point.

[white trash heroes]

yes, i appreciate not having to scroll through a page or 2 of sarkozy as the lion king or stuff you would see on hot topic. i guess i'm weird like that.

[© Tweed the Younger]

wow I thought it would be 80%+ no.  I've been disabling for a few years now

[Grumps]

Hell no and i like to keep hot girls in there or good quotes when I can for the amusement of those who don't disable them......

[bgwah]

No, I like signatures. Though I'd strongly support some sort of limit on the size of images in them.

Or even better, I'd like it if there were an ignore signatures feature, where you're only ignoring a specific poster's signature.  So I could ignore Hashemite's signature, but not necessarily Hashemite.

[Ѕenator Αverroës]

I left them disabled for my first several months as a poster, but I've enjoyed them since I re-enabled the feature not long ago.

AdBlock and the ignore function are sufficient to keep them under control.

[white trash heroes]

I'd like it if there were an ignore signatures feature, where you're only ignoring a specific poster's signature.

[Jayhawker]

Of course.

Seems like, for the most part, only newbies still use them.

[Senator Ben]

I turned off signatures years ago; after I did, I wondered why I hadn't done it years before.

Likewise.

[dead0man]

No, I like signatures. Though I'd strongly support some sort of limit on the size of images in them.

Indeed.  This is the only "adult" message board I go to that doesn't have a size limit on sigs.

[MilesC56]

No. I like signatures, it helps me learn more about who a poster is. Cheesy, I know, but whatever.

[Insula Dei]

Often necessary to tell people apart.