SENATE BILL: WHITE HOUSE BUDGET PROPOSAL (On the President's Desk) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 07:48:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: WHITE HOUSE BUDGET PROPOSAL (On the President's Desk) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: WHITE HOUSE BUDGET PROPOSAL (On the President's Desk)  (Read 28658 times)
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« on: May 23, 2012, 05:48:05 AM »

Not exactly happy with the cuts to international affairs, but very happy with the raise in veteran's assistance. DoEA supports the budget.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2012, 02:33:45 PM »


The DoEA approves.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2012, 10:13:08 PM »

Taking a page out of your book, hun.  Better idea would be to have no veterans and no combat.

Senator, I believe you've gotten lost. This is the veteran's care amendment, and you sound like you're looking for the military funding section of the budget. Just go to Section 2B amd look for something like:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This. Have a lovely day.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2012, 07:27:13 PM »


Now there's a campaign ad: "Senator Scott is so liberal he voted for more spending and taxation, even when it wasn't possible to do so!" At least it would be an ad, if you weren't running against a socialist Tongue
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2012, 05:35:02 AM »
« Edited: June 17, 2012, 05:37:55 AM by SoEA SJoyceFla »

As the great American Senator Dick Lugar would say...

Why not a flat tax? Wink

 One of the things I agree with both Lugar and the VP.

not while I have breath in my body and the strength to sign a pen Tongue

How about we remove all taxes (including payroll, estate, and capital gains) with a 9% business transaction tax, a 9% personal income tax, and a 9% federal sales tax? It's simple, transparent, and fair. It's a solutions revolution!
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2012, 09:19:58 AM »
« Edited: June 17, 2012, 09:31:35 AM by SoEA SJoyceFla »

Hmmm.... I wonder if we vetted you properly.

I was entirely properly vetted for SoEA, a job which, while including several important functions, has the added benefit of keeping me far, far away from anything to do with our tax code Tongue

I forgot to mention, you can get income tax credits for charitable donations and for living in an empowerment zone. PM me if you want the empowerment zones gerrymandered to include your place of residence.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2012, 09:26:03 PM »

Seriously? I proposed a very moderate amendment, the one that only taxes the harmful activities by the rich. It's really unfair for Atlasians to lose services when the rich are getting a tax cut.

You're characterizing financial transactions as "harmful activities"?
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2012, 07:08:47 AM »

Seriously? I proposed a very moderate amendment, the one that only taxes the harmful activities by the rich. It's really unfair for Atlasians to lose services when the rich are getting a tax cut.

You're characterizing financial transactions as "harmful activities"?
Speculation is  a harmful activity.

So your solution is to drive the little guy out of the stock market?
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2012, 02:21:31 PM »

Seriously? I proposed a very moderate amendment, the one that only taxes the harmful activities by the rich. It's really unfair for Atlasians to lose services when the rich are getting a tax cut.

You're characterizing financial transactions as "harmful activities"?
Speculation is  a harmful activity.

So your solution is to drive the little guy out of the stock market?
It's a % tax not a flat tax... The idea is to curb Wall Street.
It's still another tax on top of the fees already charged by private services. Also, trying to "curb" the stock exchange probably isn't the best solution to economic growth.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.