Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2014, 06:34:21 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections (Moderators: Mr. Morden, Bacon King, Sheriff Buford TX Justice)
| | |-+  Mittens betrays Teabaggers, admits spending cuts would throw us into recession
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
Author Topic: Mittens betrays Teabaggers, admits spending cuts would throw us into recession  (Read 1785 times)
Lіef
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30927
Czech Republic


View Profile
« on: May 25, 2012, 09:59:18 pm »
Ignore

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/25/romney-spending-cuts-depression-tea-party_n_1545933.html

Quote
"Well because, if you take a trillion dollars for instance, out of the first year of the federal budget, that would shrink GDP over 5 percent. That is by definition throwing us into recession or depression. So I'm not going to do that, of course," Romney said in an answer picked up by former bank regulator William Black, a HuffPost blogger.

Boehner, by contrast, said cutting spending will spur the economy by giving "certainty" to the business community. "It would lift this cloud of uncertainty that's causing employers to wonder what's next. So dealing with our debt and our deficit are critically important," he said.

Any spending cuts, Romney said, should come down the road, after the economy has improved.

"I don't want to have us go into a recession in order to balance the budget," he said. "I'd like to have us have high rates of growth at the same time we bring down federal spending, on, if you will, a ramp thatís affordable, but that does not cause us to enter into a economic decline."
Logged

RIP opebo
RIP the jfmtsc
RIP joshgreen
RIP King

Don't get me wrong, I love variety, and get a kick out of all these odors.
bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13661
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2012, 10:31:42 pm »
Ignore

Newt tried to warn us.

Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10224
Russian Federation


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2012, 11:25:37 pm »
Ignore

Looks like Boehner agrees with Romney here.  The spending cuts need to be focused on the long term - which means entitlements.  Too bad so far entitlements are the one thing the Democrats in DC aren't willing to look at.
Logged

  

" But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette
HagridOfTheDeep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4455
Canada


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.52

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2012, 11:56:11 pm »
Ignore

The only person who wants to cut a trillion dollars is Ron Paul. I don't see how this is news.
Logged

memphis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14076


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -3.83


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2012, 01:04:41 am »
Ignore

So he wants to increase spending and lower taxes? Typical Republican. This budget mess isn't that complicated.
Logged

I was naturally suited to be a lawyer, almost from birth. It was as if, almost, God had willed it. He meant for me to be here, to punish you, and then punish you some more.
I refuse to die a martyrs death here, because you know why?  Martyrs are still dead.
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10224
Russian Federation


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2012, 01:22:57 am »
Ignore

So he wants to increase spending and lower taxes? Typical Republican. This budget mess isn't that complicated.
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?
Logged

  

" But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette
memphis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14076


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -3.83


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2012, 05:34:50 am »
Ignore

So he wants to increase spending and lower taxes? Typical Republican. This budget mess isn't that complicated.
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?
Ending the Bush tax cuts, both on income and capital gains, and the Bush wars would be a huge step.
Logged

I was naturally suited to be a lawyer, almost from birth. It was as if, almost, God had willed it. He meant for me to be here, to punish you, and then punish you some more.
I refuse to die a martyrs death here, because you know why?  Martyrs are still dead.
Senator Meiji (D-NC)
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8312
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.03, S: -8.96

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2012, 07:58:21 am »
Ignore

So he wants to increase spending and lower taxes? Typical Republican. This budget mess isn't that complicated.
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?
Ending the Bush tax cuts, both on income and capital gains, and the Bush wars would be a huge step.

Don't really think you can call them "Bush wars" or "Bush tax cuts" after Obama's had 4 years to try to end them...
Logged

Senator Alfred F. Jones
Alfred F. Jones
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7561
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2012, 08:24:08 am »
Ignore

So he wants to increase spending and lower taxes? Typical Republican. This budget mess isn't that complicated.
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?
Ending the Bush tax cuts, both on income and capital gains, and the Bush wars would be a huge step.

Don't really think you can call them "Bush wars" or "Bush tax cuts" after Obama's had 4 years to try to end them...
I partially shall concede your points on the tax cuts (though they were originally created by Bush), but Obama has, in fact, ended Iraq and has a clear strategy for ending Afghanistan, neither of which Bush came close to doing.
Logged



Alfred is the only acceptable option

Clinton they've discovered our lovechild Sad

Senator Meiji (D-NC)
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8312
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.03, S: -8.96

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2012, 08:54:30 am »
Ignore

So he wants to increase spending and lower taxes? Typical Republican. This budget mess isn't that complicated.
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?
Ending the Bush tax cuts, both on income and capital gains, and the Bush wars would be a huge step.

Don't really think you can call them "Bush wars" or "Bush tax cuts" after Obama's had 4 years to try to end them...
I partially shall concede your points on the tax cuts (though they were originally created by Bush), but Obama has, in fact, ended Iraq and has a clear strategy for ending Afghanistan, neither of which Bush came close to doing.

Although he's ended Iraq, we're still in the Philippines, we're still in the Gulf of Aden/Horn of Africa, still conducting some operations in the Sahara, still a presence in Colombia, still bombing Yemen and the NWFP, and he started Libya. Overall he's been a tad better than Bush but not as good as McCain (cause with McCain the DNC would be howling from the rooftops about how terrible he is, keeping Guantanamo open and bombing Libya and whatnot, but now they're silent).
Logged

TXMichael
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 797
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2012, 09:48:34 am »
Ignore

Yes cutting spending would hurt the economy, that would provide "certainty".  Although I don't see how certainty of economic decline would help the spur economy
Logged

Proposed 2012 GOP election slogans

1.  Defeat the economy!  Defeat Obama!
2.  More government control over Women's bodies!
3.  Vote conservative, vote for failure!
4.  Vote weakness, vote Republican!
Senator Alfred F. Jones
Alfred F. Jones
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7561
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 26, 2012, 12:49:54 pm »
Ignore

So he wants to increase spending and lower taxes? Typical Republican. This budget mess isn't that complicated.
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?
Ending the Bush tax cuts, both on income and capital gains, and the Bush wars would be a huge step.

Don't really think you can call them "Bush wars" or "Bush tax cuts" after Obama's had 4 years to try to end them...
I partially shall concede your points on the tax cuts (though they were originally created by Bush), but Obama has, in fact, ended Iraq and has a clear strategy for ending Afghanistan, neither of which Bush came close to doing.

Although he's ended Iraq, we're still in the Philippines, we're still in the Gulf of Aden/Horn of Africa, still conducting some operations in the Sahara, still a presence in Colombia, still bombing Yemen and the NWFP, and he started Libya. Overall he's been a tad better than Bush but not as good as McCain (cause with McCain the DNC would be howling from the rooftops about how terrible he is, keeping Guantanamo open and bombing Libya and whatnot, but now they're silent).
I think Memphis is talking about Iraq/Afghanistan.
Logged



Alfred is the only acceptable option

Clinton they've discovered our lovechild Sad

Indy Texas ©
independentTX
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3726
United States


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2012, 05:25:28 pm »
Ignore

I've always been amused by the idea that laying off a bunch of people is a good way to reduce unemployment, as many Republicans seem to think.
Logged

Texas Run-Off Election Endorsements:

GOP: Lt. Gov - David Dewhurst | Atty. Gen. - Dan Branch | AgComm - Tommy Merritt | RRC - Ryan Sitton

Dem: US Senate - David Alameel | AgComm - Jim Hogan
IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2626
United States


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2012, 05:52:49 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?

What benefits do civil servants provide the economy? They don't contribute anything, so firing them will save taxpayers money and increase the number of private sector jobs.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2012, 05:57:29 pm by Ben Kenobi »Logged

"By not voting, you would let someone win who wants to destroy the regions, raise taxes, remove guns from the street, nationalize transit, expand abortion coverage, a gut the military." - Hagrid
IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2626
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2012, 05:56:59 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Ending the Bush tax cuts, both on income and capital gains, and the Bush wars would be a huge step.

So raising taxes on people who can't afford to pay more, is going to increase, rather than decrease revenues? The Bush cuts have increased, not decreased revenues.
Logged

"By not voting, you would let someone win who wants to destroy the regions, raise taxes, remove guns from the street, nationalize transit, expand abortion coverage, a gut the military." - Hagrid
IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2626
United States


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 26, 2012, 06:00:11 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?

Cut domestic spending back to 2000 levels. The way you do that is shrink the size of the government by laying off public sector workers.

Then you pass pension reform forcing public sector workers to pay 50 percent into their pensions (instead of 3 percent), and then you pass a bill eliminating collective bargaining for public sector unions.

Problem solved. You'll see a surplus in a year.
Logged

"By not voting, you would let someone win who wants to destroy the regions, raise taxes, remove guns from the street, nationalize transit, expand abortion coverage, a gut the military." - Hagrid
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3443
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 26, 2012, 06:28:23 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?

Cut domestic spending back to 2000 levels. The way you do that is shrink the size of the government by laying off public sector workers.

Then you pass pension reform forcing public sector workers to pay 50 percent into their pensions (instead of 3 percent), and then you pass a bill eliminating collective bargaining for public sector unions.

Problem solved. You'll see a surplus in a year.

In what alternate universe would this not be disastrous for our economy? Domestic spending can't be cut back down to 2000 levels at the moment without gutting the safety net and reducing GDP numbers by a non-negligible number.

What would be the purpose of destroying public sector unions besides to hurt Democrats? We need to continue to have a very high level of compensation for federal public workers in order to attract the most qualified workers possible to fill the slots and the sliver of the deficit you'd reduce would be tiny.
Logged



Economic score: -6.26
Social score: -7.74
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3443
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: May 26, 2012, 06:30:14 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Ending the Bush tax cuts, both on income and capital gains, and the Bush wars would be a huge step.

So raising taxes on people who can't afford to pay more, is going to increase, rather than decrease revenues? The Bush cuts have increased, not decreased revenues.

This post must be a joke. Pity the billionaire who is at his highest levels of wealth in human history and paying his lowest tax burden in half a century!
Logged



Economic score: -6.26
Social score: -7.74
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 709


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: May 26, 2012, 06:42:09 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?

What benefits do civil servants provide the economy? They don't contribute anything, so firing them will save taxpayers money and increase the number of private sector jobs.

Impressive even for moronic nonsense this is in a category of it own. Yes I'm sure 0cops, firemen, soldiers have no positive effect on the economy, it's not like protection from disasters criminals or foreign enemies has any positive contribution to the economy. Just as the road net which civil servants also administrated also have no positive effect either. It's the reason that Somalia which lack all these thing are the most prosperous state in the world, while USA are a third world country.


Logged
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10224
Russian Federation


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: May 26, 2012, 06:44:36 pm »
Ignore

So he wants to increase spending and lower taxes? Typical Republican. This budget mess isn't that complicated.
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?
Ending the Bush tax cuts, both on income and capital gains, and the Bush wars would be a huge step.
So a major tax increase on all Americans is going to help economic recovery?

Quote
Okay , how would you balance the budget in one year without negatively affecting the economy?

What benefits do civil servants provide the economy? They don't contribute anything, so firing them will save taxpayers money and increase the number of private sector jobs.
All those civil servants would need to find new jobs, increasing the labor supply and so making it harder for every unemployed person to find a job - at least in the short term.
Logged

  

" But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette
IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2626
United States


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: May 26, 2012, 08:30:45 pm »
Ignore

Quote
In what alternate universe would this not be disastrous for our economy? Domestic spending can't be cut back down to 2000 levels at the moment without gutting the safety net and reducing GDP numbers by a non-negligible number.

As opposed to massive, perpetual deficits that will be even more devastating longterm?

Quote
What would be the purpose of destroying public sector unions besides to hurt Democrats?

That public sector workers pay only 3 percent of their pensions is ridiculous. 50 percent corrects this massive outflow. It will happen.

Quote
We need to continue to have a very high level of compensation for federal public workers in order to attract the most qualified workers possible to fill the slots and the sliver of the deficit you'd reduce would be tiny.

Hah, pensions and pension reform is by far the largest slice of domestic spending. It will happen - we're going broke as it is with the unsustainable largesse they are currently receiving.
Logged

"By not voting, you would let someone win who wants to destroy the regions, raise taxes, remove guns from the street, nationalize transit, expand abortion coverage, a gut the military." - Hagrid
IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2626
United States


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: May 26, 2012, 08:31:57 pm »
Ignore

Quote
This post must be a joke. Pity the billionaire who is at his highest levels of wealth in human history and paying his lowest tax burden in half a century!

Most of the recipients of the Bush tax cuts are middle class. Raising their taxes is going to reduce, not increase government revenue.
Logged

"By not voting, you would let someone win who wants to destroy the regions, raise taxes, remove guns from the street, nationalize transit, expand abortion coverage, a gut the military." - Hagrid
IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2626
United States


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: May 26, 2012, 08:35:01 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Impressive even for moronic nonsense this is in a category of it own. Yes I'm sure 0cops, firemen, soldiers have no positive effect on the economy,

What percentage of public sector workers are cops, firemen or soldiers? Roughly 20 percent. The other 80 percent are none of these. Making this ratio 50 percent would be far better, which would mean laying off some 4 million public sector workers.
Logged

"By not voting, you would let someone win who wants to destroy the regions, raise taxes, remove guns from the street, nationalize transit, expand abortion coverage, a gut the military." - Hagrid
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3443
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: May 26, 2012, 09:43:48 pm »
Ignore

Quote
This post must be a joke. Pity the billionaire who is at his highest levels of wealth in human history and paying his lowest tax burden in half a century!

Most of the recipients of the Bush tax cuts are middle class. Raising their taxes is going to reduce, not increase government revenue.

What drugs are you on/may I please have some?
Logged



Economic score: -6.26
Social score: -7.74
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13297
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: May 26, 2012, 09:46:50 pm »
Ignore

Sounds like common sense -we'll see if he has the spine to stick with his position after getting raked over the coals by the Tea Party that wants everything and wants it now!  Tongue
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines