Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2015, 08:42:25 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderator: Beet)
| | |-+  House Debates Banning Sex-Selective Abortions
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
Poll
Question: If you were in Congress, would you support the passage of the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act??
Democrat: Yes   -8 (11.8%)
Democrat: No   -13 (19.1%)
Republican: Yes   -19 (27.9%)
Republican: No   -5 (7.4%)
independent/third party: Yes   -10 (14.7%)
independent/third party: No   -13 (19.1%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 68

Author Topic: House Debates Banning Sex-Selective Abortions  (Read 4110 times)
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14081
United States


View Profile WWW
« on: May 30, 2012, 05:07:22 pm »
Ignore

House debates bill to ban sex-selective abortions

By Shannon Bream
Published May 30, 2012
FoxNews.com


House members launched into a contentious debate Wednesday over a bill that would ban abortions performed on the basis of gender-selection.
 
Though sex-selective abortions are typically thought of as a problem in countries like China, bill author Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said Democrats and Republicans in the House agree that sex-selection abortions are occurring in the United States.
 
"The people of this country are overwhelmingly for this bill, and liberals are going to have to make up their mind whether they are so committed to abortion on demand that they think that includes killing little girls because they are little girls," Franks said.
 
Under his proposal, physicians who perform sex-selective abortions would face heavy fines and up to five years in jail.
 
The House, after closing out debate late Wednesday afternoon, is expected to vote on the proposal Thursday. It needs a two-thirds majority to pass.
--------------------------------------------------------

Read more
« Last Edit: May 30, 2012, 06:54:04 pm by Frodo »Logged

R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24966
Pakistan


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.83

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2012, 05:16:22 pm »
Ignore

Yes (R)
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13480
Nepal


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2012, 05:26:42 pm »
Ignore

Laws like this haven't worked anywhere in the world they've been tried for a very simple reason:  You can always claim the abortion is because of something else. 

I would probably support it anyway just for the symbolism of it.
Logged
SJoyce
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9270
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.81, S: -9.30

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2012, 05:35:41 pm »
Ignore

Yes (L).
Logged

Іbn Rushd
Averroës Nix
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10901


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2012, 05:55:56 pm »
Ignore

No. Enforcement will be extremely intrusive and marginal at best.

And is there really any evidence that sex-selective abortions in the United States are common?
Logged

Lief 🐋
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37261
Dominica


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2012, 06:09:51 pm »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.
Logged



I get a rotisserie chicken and find the strength to saute some asparagus.
Jbrase
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5993
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -5.74


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2012, 06:10:31 pm »
Ignore

Lean yes. I really hate shoving my personal beliefs down the throats of others, but abortion where the life of the mother is not at stake is one instance where an exception is made.
Logged
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18573
United States
View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2012, 06:16:57 pm »
Ignore

No (D)
Logged


Gabriel Cáceres

"He who feeds you, controls you." -Thomas Sankara
The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14905


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2012, 07:21:32 pm »
Ignore

It's interesting that the question "Do you support abortion on demand" or variants always polls more positively than "Do you support sex-selective abortion"  You'd think that sex-selective abortion is necessarily included under "all abortion."

Anyway, my answer is that abortion should be legal, and people always do legal things for both good and bad reasons.
Logged

Snowstalker   mikado is content with only questions
23:03   Snowstalker   questions never helped anyone
23:03   Snowstalker   only answers
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30089
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2012, 07:54:33 pm »
Ignore

Laws like this haven't worked anywhere in the world they've been tried for a very simple reason:  You can always claim the abortion is because of something else. 

I would probably support it anyway just for the symbolism of it.

True, altho if a ban on sex-selective abortions were focused on the abortionists, it would be possible to go after them if their ratio was too skewed.

I do have a question, does the bill also ban sex-selective in-vitro fertilizations and if not, why not?
Logged

Quote from: Ignatius of Antioch
He that possesses the word of Jesus, is truly able to bear his very silence. — Epistle to the Ephesians 3:21a
The one thing everyone can agree on is that the media is biased against them.
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8988
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2012, 08:08:01 pm »
Ignore

No (D).

Once again, the GOP is trying to manipulate the situation. There are probably very few sex-selective abortions in the U.S., and the GOP is trying to use that concept as an excuse to go after abortion doctors.
Logged



[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

I Can't Believe It's Not Murder!
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12910


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 30, 2012, 11:07:58 pm »
Ignore

No....though this is very unfortunate, there is no way to combat this practice without making all abortions suspect. This law is so vague and so easy to use throughout pregnancy that a blanket that if challenged could have the ability to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Logged


Effective policing requires to know when backing down is in the best interest of public safety.  By all accounts, the culture of the Ferguson Police was ignorant of that fact, and instead treated Cartman of South Park as a role model for how to be a police officer.
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8096
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 30, 2012, 11:54:22 pm »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.
Logged

Free Bradley Manning
I left my heart in the back of the cab
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 74311
France


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 31, 2012, 12:13:54 am »
Ignore

As shua pointed out, this law is unenforceable and thus pointless even if it was a fundamentally good idea (which I'd argue it isn't, even if the thought behind it is fundamentally good, but not every "bad" thing should be criminalized.)
Logged

k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11972
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 31, 2012, 03:13:01 am »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.
Logged

greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2640


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2012, 05:49:23 am »
Ignore

I would oppose this ban.

Maybe you don't like the reason for it, but it's not our decision to make.
Logged
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33587
France


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2012, 09:58:31 am »
Ignore

I highly doubt sex-selective abortion is a major problem in the US.

If it were, the best way to deal with it would be to make it illegal for the parents to know about the sex of the fetus before the time limit for abortions is reached.
Logged

Justice TJ
TJ in Cleve
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5418
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: May 31, 2012, 10:31:53 am »
Ignore

I don't really understand why people have such a burning dislike for this since many of them don't seem to care about killing the fetus for any other reason, not to mention this whole issue started after a sting, not someone who actually wanted to have a sex selective abortion. That's my two cents on it personally.

But I would certainly vote for the ban anyway. This "Moderate Hero" abortion stance is still preferable to the status quo and probably softens political support for abortion in general by some small marginal degree.
Logged
PR
Progressive Realist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6233
United States


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: May 31, 2012, 10:40:50 am »
Ignore

lol Trent Franks
Logged
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19384
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -8.71, S: -5.22

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: May 31, 2012, 02:31:06 pm »
Ignore

How the hell do you enforce this?
Logged

Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5152
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: 0.35


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2012, 02:52:37 pm »
Ignore

I would support this, if only for the symbolism.
Logged

Being a Libertarian is like having a fever, either you sweat it out or you die from it.
Governor Simfan34
Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12571


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: 6.96

View Profile
« Reply #21 on: May 31, 2012, 02:59:05 pm »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.

Disgusting. This has my full support.

Gentlemen- when do you support a cutoff?
Logged

The republicanism in this thread is disgusting.
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13480
Nepal


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: May 31, 2012, 03:07:27 pm »
Ignore

I highly doubt sex-selective abortion is a major problem in the US.

If it were, the best way to deal with it would be to make it illegal for the parents to know about the sex of the fetus before the time limit for abortions is reached.
That would require actually having a time limit for abortions.
Logged
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58676
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: May 31, 2012, 03:48:12 pm »
Ignore

This is a weirdly fascinating thread.
Logged

"Whatsoever Aristotle may have thought of this, I do not care"

William of Occam
oakvale
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10120
Ireland, Republic of


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: May 31, 2012, 03:53:18 pm »
Ignore

This is a stupid and obviously unenforcable idea. Of course I wouldn't support it.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines