Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2014, 04:16:59 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderator: Beet)
| | |-+  House Debates Banning Sex-Selective Abortions
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
Poll
Question: If you were in Congress, would you support the passage of the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act??
Democrat: Yes   -8 (11.8%)
Democrat: No   -13 (19.1%)
Republican: Yes   -19 (27.9%)
Republican: No   -5 (7.4%)
independent/third party: Yes   -10 (14.7%)
independent/third party: No   -13 (19.1%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 68

Author Topic: House Debates Banning Sex-Selective Abortions  (Read 2977 times)
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13305
United States


View Profile WWW
« on: May 30, 2012, 05:07:22 pm »
Ignore

House debates bill to ban sex-selective abortions

By Shannon Bream
Published May 30, 2012
FoxNews.com


House members launched into a contentious debate Wednesday over a bill that would ban abortions performed on the basis of gender-selection.
 
Though sex-selective abortions are typically thought of as a problem in countries like China, bill author Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said Democrats and Republicans in the House agree that sex-selection abortions are occurring in the United States.
 
"The people of this country are overwhelmingly for this bill, and liberals are going to have to make up their mind whether they are so committed to abortion on demand that they think that includes killing little girls because they are little girls," Franks said.
 
Under his proposal, physicians who perform sex-selective abortions would face heavy fines and up to five years in jail.
 
The House, after closing out debate late Wednesday afternoon, is expected to vote on the proposal Thursday. It needs a two-thirds majority to pass.
--------------------------------------------------------

Read more
« Last Edit: May 30, 2012, 06:54:04 pm by Frodo »Logged

R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21655
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2012, 05:16:22 pm »
Ignore

Yes (R)
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10282
Russian Federation


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2012, 05:26:42 pm »
Ignore

Laws like this haven't worked anywhere in the world they've been tried for a very simple reason:  You can always claim the abortion is because of something else. 

I would probably support it anyway just for the symbolism of it.
Logged

  

" But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette
Senator Meiji (D-NC)
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8329
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.03, S: -8.96

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2012, 05:35:41 pm »
Ignore

Yes (L).
Logged

Averroës Nix
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9071
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2012, 05:55:56 pm »
Ignore

No. Enforcement will be extremely intrusive and marginal at best.

And is there really any evidence that sex-selective abortions in the United States are common?
Logged

Lіef
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30970
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2012, 06:09:51 pm »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.
Logged

RIP opebo
RIP the jfmtsc
RIP joshgreen
RIP King

Don't get me wrong, I love variety, and get a kick out of all these odors.
Jbrase
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5686
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.03, S: -6.00

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2012, 06:10:31 pm »
Ignore

Lean yes. I really hate shoving my personal beliefs down the throats of others, but abortion where the life of the mother is not at stake is one instance where an exception is made.
Logged

Que tu Espíritu me guíe sin fronteras
Más allá de las barreras
A donde tú me llames
Tú me llevas más alla de lo soñado
Donde puedo estar confiado
Emperor Scott
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17256
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -5.74

View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2012, 06:16:57 pm »
Ignore

No (D)
Logged



The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14206


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2012, 07:21:32 pm »
Ignore

It's interesting that the question "Do you support abortion on demand" or variants always polls more positively than "Do you support sex-selective abortion"  You'd think that sex-selective abortion is necessarily included under "all abortion."

Anyway, my answer is that abortion should be legal, and people always do legal things for both good and bad reasons.
Logged

It is very advisable to examine and dissect the men of science for once, since they for their part are quite accustomed to laying bold hands on everything in the world, even the most venerable things, and taking them to pieces.

-Friedrich Nietzsche
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26693
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2012, 07:54:33 pm »
Ignore

Laws like this haven't worked anywhere in the world they've been tried for a very simple reason:  You can always claim the abortion is because of something else. 

I would probably support it anyway just for the symbolism of it.

True, altho if a ban on sex-selective abortions were focused on the abortionists, it would be possible to go after them if their ratio was too skewed.

I do have a question, does the bill also ban sex-selective in-vitro fertilizations and if not, why not?
Logged

Daily Reflections on the Revised Common Lectionary

Bible thumping kept to a minimum unless you go to sleep!
The below comic stars me!
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8716


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2012, 08:08:01 pm »
Ignore

No (D).

Once again, the GOP is trying to manipulate the situation. There are probably very few sex-selective abortions in the U.S., and the GOP is trying to use that concept as an excuse to go after abortion doctors.
Logged



[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

Night Man
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11782
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 30, 2012, 11:07:58 pm »
Ignore

No....though this is very unfortunate, there is no way to combat this practice without making all abortions suspect. This law is so vague and so easy to use throughout pregnancy that a blanket that if challenged could have the ability to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8103
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 30, 2012, 11:54:22 pm »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.
Logged

Free Bradley Manning
I am stabbed by grace and slinging blood
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 70979
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 31, 2012, 12:13:54 am »
Ignore

As shua pointed out, this law is unenforceable and thus pointless even if it was a fundamentally good idea (which I'd argue it isn't, even if the thought behind it is fundamentally good, but not every "bad" thing should be criminalized.)
Logged

Famous True Leftists:

k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11983
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 31, 2012, 03:13:01 am »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.
Logged

greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2504


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2012, 05:49:23 am »
Ignore

I would oppose this ban.

Maybe you don't like the reason for it, but it's not our decision to make.
Logged
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28808
France


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2012, 09:58:31 am »
Ignore

I highly doubt sex-selective abortion is a major problem in the US.

If it were, the best way to deal with it would be to make it illegal for the parents to know about the sex of the fetus before the time limit for abortions is reached.
Logged

Quote from: IRC
22:15   ComradeSibboleth   this is all extremely terrible and in all respects absolutely fycking dire.
Lt. Governor TJ
TJ in Cleve
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4397
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: May 31, 2012, 10:31:53 am »
Ignore

I don't really understand why people have such a burning dislike for this since many of them don't seem to care about killing the fetus for any other reason, not to mention this whole issue started after a sting, not someone who actually wanted to have a sex selective abortion. That's my two cents on it personally.

But I would certainly vote for the ban anyway. This "Moderate Hero" abortion stance is still preferable to the status quo and probably softens political support for abortion in general by some small marginal degree.
Logged
Less-Progressivism, More Realism
Progressive Realist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5371
United States


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: May 31, 2012, 10:40:50 am »
Ignore

lol Trent Franks
Logged

Ready 4 Reform.
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15516


Political Matrix
E: -8.39, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: May 31, 2012, 02:31:06 pm »
Ignore

How the hell do you enforce this?
Logged

Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 3.93, S: 1.13


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2012, 02:52:37 pm »
Ignore

I would support this, if only for the symbolism.
Logged

Being a Libertarian is like having a fever, either you sweat it out or you die from it.
Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8092


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: May 31, 2012, 02:59:05 pm »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.

Disgusting. This has my full support.

Gentlemen- when do you support a cutoff?
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10282
Russian Federation


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: May 31, 2012, 03:07:27 pm »
Ignore

I highly doubt sex-selective abortion is a major problem in the US.

If it were, the best way to deal with it would be to make it illegal for the parents to know about the sex of the fetus before the time limit for abortions is reached.
That would require actually having a time limit for abortions.
Logged

  

" But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette
Comrade Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 55488
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: May 31, 2012, 03:48:12 pm »
Ignore

This is a weirdly fascinating thread.
Logged



Richard Hoggart 1918-2014
oakvale
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8592
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

View Profile
« Reply #24 on: May 31, 2012, 03:53:18 pm »
Ignore

This is a stupid and obviously unenforcable idea. Of course I wouldn't support it.
Logged

Senior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in Atlasia.
GRIMES FOR KENTUCKY SENATOR
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines