Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 28, 2014, 03:17:12 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderator: Beet)
| | |-+  House Debates Banning Sex-Selective Abortions
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
Poll
Question: If you were in Congress, would you support the passage of the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act??
Democrat: Yes   -8 (11.8%)
Democrat: No   -13 (19.1%)
Republican: Yes   -19 (27.9%)
Republican: No   -5 (7.4%)
independent/third party: Yes   -10 (14.7%)
independent/third party: No   -13 (19.1%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 68

Author Topic: House Debates Banning Sex-Selective Abortions  (Read 3061 times)
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13410
United States


View Profile WWW
« on: May 30, 2012, 05:07:22 pm »
Ignore

House debates bill to ban sex-selective abortions

By Shannon Bream
Published May 30, 2012
FoxNews.com


House members launched into a contentious debate Wednesday over a bill that would ban abortions performed on the basis of gender-selection.
 
Though sex-selective abortions are typically thought of as a problem in countries like China, bill author Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said Democrats and Republicans in the House agree that sex-selection abortions are occurring in the United States.
 
"The people of this country are overwhelmingly for this bill, and liberals are going to have to make up their mind whether they are so committed to abortion on demand that they think that includes killing little girls because they are little girls," Franks said.
 
Under his proposal, physicians who perform sex-selective abortions would face heavy fines and up to five years in jail.
 
The House, after closing out debate late Wednesday afternoon, is expected to vote on the proposal Thursday. It needs a two-thirds majority to pass.
--------------------------------------------------------

Read more
« Last Edit: May 30, 2012, 06:54:04 pm by Frodo »Logged

R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21757
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.55, S: -7.91

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2012, 05:16:22 pm »
Ignore

Yes (R)
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11172
Russian Federation


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2012, 05:26:42 pm »
Ignore

Laws like this haven't worked anywhere in the world they've been tried for a very simple reason:  You can always claim the abortion is because of something else. 

I would probably support it anyway just for the symbolism of it.
Logged

Iron King SJoyce
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8787
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2012, 05:35:41 pm »
Ignore

Yes (L).
Logged

AverroŽs Nix
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9649
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2012, 05:55:56 pm »
Ignore

No. Enforcement will be extremely intrusive and marginal at best.

And is there really any evidence that sex-selective abortions in the United States are common?
Logged

Herman Cain's Gold Chain
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31914
Dominica


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2012, 06:09:51 pm »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.
Logged



(Part of the 2012 Election Throwback Series)
Jbrase
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5909
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -5.74


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2012, 06:10:31 pm »
Ignore

Lean yes. I really hate shoving my personal beliefs down the throats of others, but abortion where the life of the mother is not at stake is one instance where an exception is made.
Logged

Emperor Scott
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18693
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -5.74

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2012, 06:16:57 pm »
Ignore

No (D)
Logged

The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14385


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2012, 07:21:32 pm »
Ignore

It's interesting that the question "Do you support abortion on demand" or variants always polls more positively than "Do you support sex-selective abortion"  You'd think that sex-selective abortion is necessarily included under "all abortion."

Anyway, my answer is that abortion should be legal, and people always do legal things for both good and bad reasons.
Logged

Einzige is a poltroon who cowardly turns down duel challenges he should be honor-bound to accept. The Code Duello authorizes you to mock and belittle such a pathetic honorless scoundrel.
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27817
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2012, 07:54:33 pm »
Ignore

Laws like this haven't worked anywhere in the world they've been tried for a very simple reason:  You can always claim the abortion is because of something else. 

I would probably support it anyway just for the symbolism of it.

True, altho if a ban on sex-selective abortions were focused on the abortionists, it would be possible to go after them if their ratio was too skewed.

I do have a question, does the bill also ban sex-selective in-vitro fertilizations and if not, why not?
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8762


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2012, 08:08:01 pm »
Ignore

No (D).

Once again, the GOP is trying to manipulate the situation. There are probably very few sex-selective abortions in the U.S., and the GOP is trying to use that concept as an excuse to go after abortion doctors.
Logged



[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

MooMooMoo
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12061
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 30, 2012, 11:07:58 pm »
Ignore

No....though this is very unfortunate, there is no way to combat this practice without making all abortions suspect. This law is so vague and so easy to use throughout pregnancy that a blanket that if challenged could have the ability to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Logged


the result is a sense that we were told to attend a lavish dinner party that was going to be wonderful and by the time we got there, all the lobster and steak had been eaten, a fight had broken out, the police had been called and all that was left was warm beer and chips.
[/quot
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8102
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 30, 2012, 11:54:22 pm »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.
Logged

Free Bradley Manning
Passing Through a Screen Door
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 71890
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 31, 2012, 12:13:54 am »
Ignore

As shua pointed out, this law is unenforceable and thus pointless even if it was a fundamentally good idea (which I'd argue it isn't, even if the thought behind it is fundamentally good, but not every "bad" thing should be criminalized.)
Logged

Victory over Inks dedicated in memory.


01/05/2004-01/10/2014
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11978
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 31, 2012, 03:13:01 am »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.
Logged

greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2529


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2012, 05:49:23 am »
Ignore

I would oppose this ban.

Maybe you don't like the reason for it, but it's not our decision to make.
Logged
Scottish Robb Stark
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30214
France


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2012, 09:58:31 am »
Ignore

I highly doubt sex-selective abortion is a major problem in the US.

If it were, the best way to deal with it would be to make it illegal for the parents to know about the sex of the fetus before the time limit for abortions is reached.
Logged



Robb of the House Stark, First of his Name, Lord of Winterfell and King in the North



Quote from: IRC
22:15   ComradeSibboleth   this is all extremely terrible and in all respects absolutely fycking dire.

"A reformist is someone who realizes that, when you bang your head on a wall, it's the head that breaks rather than the wall."

Peppino, from the movie Baaria
Lt. Governor TJ
TJ in Cleve
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4672
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: May 31, 2012, 10:31:53 am »
Ignore

I don't really understand why people have such a burning dislike for this since many of them don't seem to care about killing the fetus for any other reason, not to mention this whole issue started after a sting, not someone who actually wanted to have a sex selective abortion. That's my two cents on it personally.

But I would certainly vote for the ban anyway. This "Moderate Hero" abortion stance is still preferable to the status quo and probably softens political support for abortion in general by some small marginal degree.
Logged
They call me PR
Progressive Realist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5385
United States


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: May 31, 2012, 10:40:50 am »
Ignore

lol Trent Franks
Logged
A.G. Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16958
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -8.06, S: -4.96

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: May 31, 2012, 02:31:06 pm »
Ignore

How the hell do you enforce this?
Logged

Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4978
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: 0.35


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2012, 02:52:37 pm »
Ignore

I would support this, if only for the symbolism.
Logged

Being a Libertarian is like having a fever, either you sweat it out or you die from it.
Simfan34
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9619
Ghana


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: May 31, 2012, 02:59:05 pm »
Ignore

People should be able to have abortions for whatever reason they want.

Disgusting. This has my full support.

Gentlemen- when do you support a cutoff?
Logged



shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11172
Russian Federation


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: May 31, 2012, 03:07:27 pm »
Ignore

I highly doubt sex-selective abortion is a major problem in the US.

If it were, the best way to deal with it would be to make it illegal for the parents to know about the sex of the fetus before the time limit for abortions is reached.
That would require actually having a time limit for abortions.
Logged

Sibboleth Bist
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56219
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: May 31, 2012, 03:48:12 pm »
Ignore

This is a weirdly fascinating thread.
Logged

oakvale
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9205
Palestinian Territory, Occupied
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

View Profile
« Reply #24 on: May 31, 2012, 03:53:18 pm »
Ignore

This is a stupid and obviously unenforcable idea. Of course I wouldn't support it.
Logged

Seriously, go die in a ditch, anti-semitic scumbag.
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines