American Independent Party? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:49:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  American Independent Party? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: American Independent Party?  (Read 4766 times)
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« on: June 07, 2012, 09:01:48 AM »

Yes; Wallace was a genius (an evil one), and could win the hearts and support of union voters and blue collar workers with his populist rhetoric.  But he would need to emphasize his support for unions, etc. to get votes outside the south.  If he wanted, he could run to the left of Dems on the economy and to the right of Nixon on social issues, and at least win the Old Confederacy.
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2012, 12:14:59 AM »

Yes; Wallace was a genius (an evil one), and could win the hearts and support of union voters and blue collar workers with his populist rhetoric.  But he would need to emphasize his support for unions, etc. to get votes outside the south.  If he wanted, he could run to the left of Dems on the economy and to the right of Nixon on social issues, and at least win the Old Confederacy.

I don't think Wallace was a genius at all. A genius wouldn't have picked LeMay. But actually, you make a great point. Wallace would have needed to outdistance Humphrey with blue collar workers in places like here in Pennsylvania where HHH was popular. Not an impossible feat. Two things conspired to beat him in doing so. First of all, Nixon's Southern Strategy cut his legs out from under him with voters who might have been sympathetic. The other was the unions loyalty to Humphrey, an ally they trusted rather than Wallace, whom I'm sure they figured was not trustworthy.

Not only this, but the fact that Wallace comes from Alabama, where, like the rest of the deep south, open shop was law.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe right-to-work laws in USA began in the deep south.  So while Wallace's personal record might not be in question, unions (at least the higher-ups in them) would hold their nose and go with Humphrey just because they didn't want someone from this anti-union region (who was also a racial bigot) carrying the banner of the worker's movement.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.