Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 22, 2014, 04:36:47 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: True Federalist, Former Moderate, Badger)
| | |-+  disturbingly Orwellian passage of the month
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: disturbingly Orwellian passage of the month  (Read 696 times)
Linus Van Pelt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1789


View Profile
« on: June 08, 2012, 11:23:16 am »
Ignore

Quote
Mr. Obama embraced a disputed method for counting civilian casualties that did little to box him in. It in effect counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants, according to several administration officials, unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent. ... This counting method may partly explain the official claims of extraordinarily low collateral deaths.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagewanted=3&_r=1

Logged
Sibboleth Bist
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56189
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2012, 12:05:59 pm »
Ignore

Change!
Logged

Grumps
GM3PRP
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33393
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2012, 12:22:18 pm »
Ignore

Change!

To be more precise

Logged

Taliban Captors



Taliban Daddy



If this affects my job then so be it.
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2459
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2012, 03:23:02 pm »
Ignore

Logged

"I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to see realized." ~ Nelson Mandela
only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58783
India


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2012, 03:38:50 am »
Ignore

"partly"?
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
Insula Dei
belgiansocialist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4259
Belgium


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2012, 02:49:18 pm »
Ignore

"partly"?

There might be some plain good old lying as well.
Logged

k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11978
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2012, 03:59:48 pm »
Ignore

If Bush did this, the internet would be losing its mind right now.
Logged

Senator Alfred F. Jones
Alfred F. Jones
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8278
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2012, 05:13:26 pm »
Ignore

If Bush did this, the internet would be losing its mind right now.

Well, the Internet reaction to Obama's national security policies seems to be a collective sigh.
Logged



There is a lot of humor to be mined from this as the mind of LBJ in the body of an 18 month old baby girl is quite hilarious.

Alfred is the Atlasian equivalent of a malevolent deity.

batmacumba
andrefeijao
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 447
France


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2012, 12:20:01 am »
Ignore

If Bush did this, the internet would be losing its mind right now.

Well, the Internet reaction to Obama's national security policies seems to be a collective sigh.

But Al-Qaeda's second-in-command was caught!!!! How can this be wrong?
Logged

hawkeye59
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2755
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2012, 02:01:03 pm »
Ignore

If Bush did this, the internet would be losing its mind right now.

Well, the Internet reaction to Obama's national security policies seems to be a collective sigh.

But Al-Qaeda's second-in-command was caught!!!! How can this be wrong?
Not to mention Al-Awlaki.  Here's a question to the people who are against drones so much: how would you have gotten Al-Awlaki and the Al-Qaeda second-in-command, knowing that you can't go in there and arrest him, and knowing that they are responsible for many deadly attacks and attempted attacks on US soil?
Now don't get me wrong, I oppose this. But I don't oppose using drones in general.
Logged

My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair.  So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we’ll change the world.-Jack Layton 1950-2011
A man may die, nations may rise and fall, but an idea lives on-John F. Kennedy 1917-1963
Purch
Full Member
***
Posts: 196


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 11, 2012, 02:52:00 pm »
Ignore

If Bush did this, the internet would be losing its mind right now.

Well, the Internet reaction to Obama's national security policies seems to be a collective sigh.

But Al-Qaeda's second-in-command was caught!!!! How can this be wrong?
Not to mention Al-Awlaki.  Here's a question to the people who are against drones so much: how would you have gotten Al-Awlaki and the Al-Qaeda second-in-command, knowing that you can't go in there and arrest him, and knowing that they are responsible for many deadly attacks and attempted attacks on US soil?
Now don't get me wrong, I oppose this. But I don't oppose using drones in general.

Well considering our intrusion within the middle eat is what led to those attacks on Us soil in the first place......  So instead of learning from our double edged policies of the past we use drone attacks and completely ignore the the civilian causalities because we're America. From our bases on Saudi Arabi, To our bombings of Iraq, To our overthrow of Iranian Governments, To our arming of the Afgan resistance, to our drone attacks on Pakistan.... And people still believe we get attacked because we're free and a symbol of democracy.
Logged

Those gravestones don't say democrat or republican those gravestones say American.
Iron King SJoyce
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8786
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 11, 2012, 02:56:38 pm »
Ignore

If Bush did this, the internet would be losing its mind right now.

Well, the Internet reaction to Obama's national security policies seems to be a collective sigh.

But Al-Qaeda's second-in-command was caught!!!! How can this be wrong?
Not to mention Al-Awlaki.  Here's a question to the people who are against drones so much: how would you have gotten Al-Awlaki and the Al-Qaeda second-in-command, knowing that you can't go in there and arrest him, and knowing that they are responsible for many deadly attacks and attempted attacks on US soil?
Now don't get me wrong, I oppose this. But I don't oppose using drones in general.

I wouldn't have, because they wouldn't pose a threat to the United States, because military bases overseas would be shut down and threats and violence as our policy towards other nations would no longer be part of my administration's foreign policy; thus, they would have no reason to attack us.
Logged

Purch
Full Member
***
Posts: 196


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 11, 2012, 02:59:15 pm »
Ignore

If Bush did this, the internet would be losing its mind right now.

Well, the Internet reaction to Obama's national security policies seems to be a collective sigh.

But Al-Qaeda's second-in-command was caught!!!! How can this be wrong?
Not to mention Al-Awlaki.  Here's a question to the people who are against drones so much: how would you have gotten Al-Awlaki and the Al-Qaeda second-in-command, knowing that you can't go in there and arrest him, and knowing that they are responsible for many deadly attacks and attempted attacks on US soil?
Now don't get me wrong, I oppose this. But I don't oppose using drones in general.

I wouldn't have, because they wouldn't pose a threat to the United States, because military bases overseas would be shut down and threats and violence as our policy towards other nations would no longer be part of my administration's foreign policy; thus, they would have no reason to attack us.

Post of the year
Logged

Those gravestones don't say democrat or republican those gravestones say American.
hawkeye59
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2755
United States


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 11, 2012, 07:22:52 pm »
Ignore

If Bush did this, the internet would be losing its mind right now.

Well, the Internet reaction to Obama's national security policies seems to be a collective sigh.

But Al-Qaeda's second-in-command was caught!!!! How can this be wrong?
Not to mention Al-Awlaki.  Here's a question to the people who are against drones so much: how would you have gotten Al-Awlaki and the Al-Qaeda second-in-command, knowing that you can't go in there and arrest him, and knowing that they are responsible for many deadly attacks and attempted attacks on US soil?
Now don't get me wrong, I oppose this. But I don't oppose using drones in general.

I wouldn't have, because they wouldn't pose a threat to the United States, because military bases overseas would be shut down and threats and violence as our policy towards other nations would no longer be part of my administration's foreign policy; thus, they would have no reason to attack us.
I wouldn't oppose that in general, but if you broke it, you fix it.
Logged

My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair.  So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we’ll change the world.-Jack Layton 1950-2011
A man may die, nations may rise and fall, but an idea lives on-John F. Kennedy 1917-1963
Iron King SJoyce
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8786
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 11, 2012, 08:48:26 pm »
Ignore

If Bush did this, the internet would be losing its mind right now.

Well, the Internet reaction to Obama's national security policies seems to be a collective sigh.

But Al-Qaeda's second-in-command was caught!!!! How can this be wrong?
Not to mention Al-Awlaki.  Here's a question to the people who are against drones so much: how would you have gotten Al-Awlaki and the Al-Qaeda second-in-command, knowing that you can't go in there and arrest him, and knowing that they are responsible for many deadly attacks and attempted attacks on US soil?
Now don't get me wrong, I oppose this. But I don't oppose using drones in general.

I wouldn't have, because they wouldn't pose a threat to the United States, because military bases overseas would be shut down and threats and violence as our policy towards other nations would no longer be part of my administration's foreign policy; thus, they would have no reason to attack us.
I wouldn't oppose that in general, but if you broke it, you fix it.

You can't really break something that's already broken.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines