Which electoral maps are the most aesthetically pleasing to your eye? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:30:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Which electoral maps are the most aesthetically pleasing to your eye? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Which electoral maps are the most aesthetically pleasing to your eye?  (Read 15353 times)
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798
« on: June 10, 2012, 10:16:04 PM »
« edited: June 11, 2012, 08:05:14 AM by muon2 »
One of my favorites is a pair of close elections. Compare the 2000 map to 1916, only 7 of the continental 48 states are the same party.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2012, 08:51:24 AM »
Quote from: jimrtex on June 11, 2012, 12:35:18 PM
Quote from: muon2 on June 10, 2012, 10:16:04 PM
One of my favorites is a pair of close elections. Compare the 2000 map to 1916, only 7 of the continental 48 states are the same party.





So you have the 3 hard-core Republican states of SD, IN, and WV.

And the 4 hard-core Democrat states of WA, CA, NM and MD.

And in between in the close election of 1976, WV was solid D and CA, NM and WA were R. That leaves MD as the only hard-core D state and IN and SD remaining as hard-core R.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,798
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2014, 09:04:20 AM »

Your image isn't in the gallery at present.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.