If Obama Wins Reelection How Would You Feel

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

There's no 'actively relieved but still not happy' option.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Pay special attention to places like California, Illinois, and New York. Those people will be the most depressed come December.

I've tried, but I'm not able to figure out what this is supposed to imply even in rightist mirrorspeak.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Pay special attention to places like California, Illinois, and New York. Those people will be the most depressed come December.

I've tried, but I'm not able to figure out what this is supposed to imply even in rightist mirrorspeak.

lol

I'm genuinely not. There's no particular reason why those states should be the most depressed following Obama's reelection specifically even if you are using 'depressed' as an awful pun.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Pay special attention to places like California, Illinois, and New York. Those people will be the most depressed come December.

I've tried, but I'm not able to figure out what this is supposed to imply even in rightist mirrorspeak.

lol

I'm genuinely not. There's no particular reason why those states should be the most depressed following Obama's reelection specifically even if you are using 'depressed' as an awful pun.

Tsk, tsk, Nathan. You need to brush up on your Fox "News" hack-speak. He's obviously assuming a Mittens win. You see, California, New York, and Illinois are all Democratic words, and reality is reversed in right-wing grammar. It's in the textbook, page 349. There's a little box labeled "Red States/Blue States and How To Avoid Them".

In any other thread I would have seen that he's assuming a Mittens win, but considering the eventuality explicitly being addressed in the title of this thread it threw me for a loop. I forgot about the reversal of reality and teleological suspension of the merely logical.