Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2014, 02:33:08 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Can anyone explain Mississippi's weird results from 1956-1964?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Can anyone explain Mississippi's weird results from 1956-1964?  (Read 1991 times)
HockeyDude
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5988
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -8.26

View Profile
« on: June 18, 2012, 10:35:23 pm »
Ignore

1956:
Stevenson: 58
Eisenhower: 24
Unpledged?: 17

1960:
Unpledged?: 39
Kennedy: 34
Nixon: 25

1964:
Goldwater: 87!?
Johnson: 12

So... how exactly did MS run it's elections for there to be unpledged electors on the ballot, and why did the voters vote for something that would make no difference?  (protest vote?).  And how the hell did Goldwater manage 87% in the state when Johnson won in the biggest landslide in modern history?  I know the Deep South was Goldwater's base and all... but other Southern whites seemed OK enough with Johnson (a Southerner) that Goldwater wasn't racking up such ridiculous numbers. 

It just seems like the rest of the country was "normal" in a way... and for every election over 12 years Mississippi went off on a tangent all by itself. 
Logged


If it comes to that, yes, but there is no reason to be that pessimistic.
morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5082
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2012, 11:46:04 pm »
Ignore

Racism.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1639


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2012, 12:12:47 am »
Ignore

Decades of Northern Aggression.
Logged
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14749


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2012, 12:13:36 am »
Ignore

Decades of Northern Aggression.

Bahahahhahaha
Logged

Please Senators, don't let the Russians, a folk of alcoholic homophobic, take Crimee
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10356


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2012, 12:36:41 am »
Ignore

Sending a message to DC.

1956 Democrat Stevenson.  A Republican was in office.

1960 Unpledged.  A curse on both your houses.

1964 Republican Goldwater.  A Democrat was in office.
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10282
Russian Federation


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2012, 03:18:01 am »
Ignore

The unpledged vote meant that if MS was needed for a candidate to win the electoral college, they wouldn't get it. Then, either a candidate makes a deal with the electors to get their vote, or it  goes to the House and some sort of deal or a better candidate is selected.  So a protest vote, but not impossible that it would make a difference.


One thing to keep in mind is that MS had the lowest voter participation of any state at that time (25% in 1960).
And that's not just because people weren't interested in voting. In some ways democracy is a recent development in the Deep South.  The political tradition was more unified than in neighboring states with more upland areas (eg.  AL, where you had pro-Unionists in the hill country during the Civil War).
Logged

  

" But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette
Ebowed
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16295
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -8.32, S: -9.30

View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2012, 09:50:18 am »
Ignore

Decades of Northern Aggression.

Yes, if it weren't for 'Northern Aggression', maybe Mississippi wouldn't have had to perform all of those lynchings.
Logged

...anyone who says our society must force people to expose themselves to those of the opposite sexual orientation, is not decent.

So you mean if we force the gay to be exposed to the straight, we are treating the gay indecently?  Because you didn't specify which direction the hate was supposed to go there, Black Beans.
False Leftist
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5472
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2012, 04:14:02 pm »
Ignore

Racism.
You beat me to it!
Logged

Thanks guys!

As I said once I'd moderate not per the Terms of Service but the the Word of Jesus Christ.  For there is neither troll nor quality poster, neither banned nor unbanned, nor is there red avatar or blue avatar for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Indy Texas
independentTX
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3750
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2012, 05:21:31 pm »
Ignore

In MS at that time, your presidential ballot didn't simply have the candidates on it. Instead, you had to vote for a slate of electors who were intending to support a candidate. So instead of voting for Dwight Eisenhower or Adlai Stevenson, you would either vote for electors pledged to vote for Eisenhower, electors pledged to vote for Stevenson, or electors who were unpledged.

As to why they picked unpledged electors? Disagreement with the Eisenhower administration over its use of federal power to force school districts to comply with the Brown v. Board of Education ruling, the Democrats' selection of a northern, liberal pro-civil rights candidate, racism.

Logged

False Leftist
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5472
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2012, 06:28:56 pm »
Ignore

Quote
the biggest landslide in modern history



Logged

Thanks guys!

As I said once I'd moderate not per the Terms of Service but the the Word of Jesus Christ.  For there is neither troll nor quality poster, neither banned nor unbanned, nor is there red avatar or blue avatar for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26693
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2012, 09:31:29 pm »

Quote
the biggest landslide in modern history





While the electoral vote margins in 1972 and 1984 are greater than what Johnson got in 1964, Johnson's 61.05% of the popular vote in 1964  is the largest share of the popular vote anyone has gotten since Monroe got 80.6% in an essentially unopposed 1820 election.
Logged

Daily Reflections on the Revised Common Lectionary

Bible thumping kept to a minimum unless you go to sleep!
The below comic stars me!
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10282
Russian Federation


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2012, 11:48:33 pm »
Ignore

Where did you get the 1820 popular vote figure TF?
Logged

  

" But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette
HockeyDude
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5988
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.03, S: -8.26

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2012, 09:26:50 am »
Ignore

Thanks for the answers... I knew racism had something to do with it, but had no idea about the actual MS election process.  

Still find it fascinating that in 1964 MS voters (who I'm assuming were all white), were SO homogenous.  

EDIT: then again, checking the 2008 exit poll, whites in MS went 88-11 McCain.  LA and AL are similar, and outside of those 3 it seems to normalize to a degree.  This is 2008 for god's sake, that's just unbelievable. 
« Last Edit: June 21, 2012, 09:33:22 am by AWallTEP81 »Logged


If it comes to that, yes, but there is no reason to be that pessimistic.
Abdul the Damned
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37892
Turkey
View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: June 21, 2012, 12:31:32 pm »
Ignore

Decades of Northern Aggression.

I really hope it was nothing more than a failed irony attempt.
Logged

True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26693
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: June 24, 2012, 12:31:43 pm »

Where did you get the 1820 popular vote figure TF?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1820

Altho technically, that's the vote share for Republican electors, not for Monroe himself.  Here's a weird fact.  The Federalist electors won in Massachusetts, but they voted for Monroe as well.
Logged

Daily Reflections on the Revised Common Lectionary

Bible thumping kept to a minimum unless you go to sleep!
The below comic stars me!
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15516


Political Matrix
E: -8.39, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 28, 2012, 10:47:44 am »
Ignore

And that's not just because people weren't interested in voting. In some ways democracy is a recent development in the Deep South.  The political tradition was more unified than in neighboring states with more upland areas (eg.  AL, where you had pro-Unionists in the hill country during the Civil War).

Also because blacks were effectively barred from voting.
Logged

Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12610


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2012, 09:05:10 am »
Ignore

Sending a message to DC.

1964 Republican Goldwater.  A Democrat was in office.

Mm-hmm.
Logged
Harry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18256
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2012, 02:22:18 pm »
Ignore

Before the 24th amendment, blacks essentially were not allowed to vote at all.
Logged
farewell
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58527
India


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2012, 03:45:51 am »
Ignore

The unpledged vote meant that if MS was needed for a candidate to win the electoral college, they wouldn't get it.
It meant that if the Democrats needed Mississippi (and the same thing was tried in Louisiana too but the unpledged slate didn't win) the civil rights plank of their platform had to be retracted. That is all. It was not available to Nixon.
Logged

I may conceivably reconsider.

Knowing me it's more likely than not.
False Leftist
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5472
United States


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: July 11, 2012, 10:38:39 am »
Ignore

Before the 24th amendment, blacks essentially were not allowed to vote at all.
In the South, that is.
Logged

Thanks guys!

As I said once I'd moderate not per the Terms of Service but the the Word of Jesus Christ.  For there is neither troll nor quality poster, neither banned nor unbanned, nor is there red avatar or blue avatar for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
old timey villain
cope1989
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1703


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: July 11, 2012, 07:52:31 pm »
Ignore

Thanks for the answers... I knew racism had something to do with it, but had no idea about the actual MS election process.  

Still find it fascinating that in 1964 MS voters (who I'm assuming were all white), were SO homogenous.  

EDIT: then again, checking the 2008 exit poll, whites in MS went 88-11 McCain.  LA and AL are similar, and outside of those 3 it seems to normalize to a degree.  This is 2008 for god's sake, that's just unbelievable. 

Yeah, it's pretty despicable. I mean, you could argue against the racist angle and say that whites in the deep south just happen to be overehelmingly conservative, but even that doesn't justify close to 90% of whites voting Republican when the vote is much more split in almost every other state. Even whites in Utah gave Obama more support.

So when you examine the facts you realize that racial politics still exist in the south in a big way. 1964 was just the first election that began to turn the "solid south" the other way.
Logged

Can't we all just get along?
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2251
United States


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: July 11, 2012, 10:09:46 pm »
Ignore

the white vote exit polls are wrong in some states. Evidence suggests that while McCain obviously won whites by a huge margin in the south, it wasn't by as much. From what I see in the south he got:

73% in Texas
72% in Oklahoma
no partisan data for Arkansas
79% in Louisiana
82% in Mississippi
77% in Alabama
58% in Florida
72% in Georgia
69% in South Carolina
61% in North Carolina
67% in Tennessee
no partisan data for Kentucky or West Virginia
59% in Virginia
56% in Maryland
46% in Delaware
Logged

old timey villain
cope1989
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1703


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2012, 10:16:13 pm »
Ignore

the white vote exit polls are wrong in some states. Evidence suggests that while McCain obviously won whites by a huge margin in the south, it wasn't by as much. From what I see in the south he got:

73% in Texas
72% in Oklahoma
no partisan data for Arkansas
79% in Louisiana
82% in Mississippi
77% in Alabama
58% in Florida
72% in Georgia
69% in South Carolina
61% in North Carolina
67% in Tennessee
no partisan data for Kentucky or West Virginia
59% in Virginia
56% in Maryland
46% in Delaware

How did you determine that data?
Logged

Can't we all just get along?
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2251
United States


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: July 11, 2012, 10:42:59 pm »
Ignore

the white vote exit polls are wrong in some states. Evidence suggests that while McCain obviously won whites by a huge margin in the south, it wasn't by as much. From what I see in the south he got:

73% in Texas
72% in Oklahoma
no partisan data for Arkansas
79% in Louisiana
82% in Mississippi
77% in Alabama
58% in Florida
72% in Georgia
69% in South Carolina
61% in North Carolina
67% in Tennessee
no partisan data for Kentucky or West Virginia
59% in Virginia
56% in Maryland
46% in Delaware

How did you determine that data?

Dave's Redistricting App. You can see my thread about it below:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=154691.0
Logged

realisticidealist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6381
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: 2.78

View Profile
« Reply #24 on: July 11, 2012, 11:01:37 pm »
Ignore

the white vote exit polls are wrong in some states. Evidence suggests that while McCain obviously won whites by a huge margin in the south, it wasn't by as much. From what I see in the south he got:

73% in Texas
72% in Oklahoma
no partisan data for Arkansas
79% in Louisiana
82% in Mississippi
77% in Alabama
58% in Florida
72% in Georgia
69% in South Carolina
61% in North Carolina
67% in Tennessee
no partisan data for Kentucky or West Virginia
59% in Virginia
56% in Maryland
46% in Delaware

How did you determine that data?

Dave's Redistricting App. You can see my thread about it below:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=154691.0

That wouldn't take into account racial turnout differentials or behavior of localized 'minoritied' groups (that is, whites in heavily black areas or blacks in heavily white areas) which evidence suggests vote differently than those in areas where they're a supermajority. While you'd get relatively close, I'd take those numbers with a grain of salt.
Logged

"The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return."
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines