Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 23, 2013, 03:03:44 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
General Politics
Economics
(Moderator:
ag
)
Falconomics
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Falconomics (Read 589 times)
The CINC
Rookie
Posts: 34
Falconomics
«
on:
June 19, 2012, 01:17:41 pm »
Here is the the policy I propose to get us out of this great recession
For staters, we need a new tax code. I propose the following
A flat tax of 20% on individuals and corporations on all income earned beyond the first $20,000
A Value Added Tax of 20% with a annual rebate of $2000 for every man, woman and child living in the USA
A Land Value Tax with all proceeds going to fund a single-payer system of education from Preschool to Grad School
Increasing alcohol and tobacco taxes as well as taxes on carbon, soda, caffine, "XXX" rated businesses, junk mail and transfats
A 0.5% Securities Transaction Excise Tax
Abolition of the payrol tax, AMT, and the capital gains tax rolled into the flat tax
I would allocate spending as shares of GDP
5% Social Security/Pensions
5% Health Care
5% Military
5% Education
5% Tax Credits
5% Rebuilding America's infrastructure
3% Paying the principle of the national debt
2% Intrest on the national debt
2% Criminal justice/homeland security
2% General Government
1% Research and Development
In addition to the above, we will implement the following
* Replace the Federal Reserve with a Third Bank of the USA that is government owned
* Revive the PWA and WPA of the FDR era as well as create a "Green Corps".
* Create a Portable Pension Plan for workers to carry their pensions with them
* Reform the Patent Office and implement a national innovation strategy
Under this plan, we will not only ballance the budget but begin to pay down the national debt. We will put 20 million people to work rebuilding our infrastructure and enable our economy to grow at an annual rate of 15%. Gradually, the percentage of GDP spent on intrest will diminish while the percentage spent on principle will increase until the national debt is retired which we will then save $400 billion a year on interest on the national debt.
Logged
The CINC
Rookie
Posts: 34
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #1 on:
June 19, 2012, 01:42:51 pm »
Between the new tax code, replacing the employer-based health care system with universal health vouchers, and the portable pension plan, we believe we will encourage businesses from all over the world to relocate their means of production as well as their corporate officies to the USA. We will also encourage savings and investment and encourage the flow of trillions of dollars from offshore financial centers back the USA to be put to work expanding our economy.
With the economy growing at a high rate, we may have labor shortages so the immigration system will be reformed to increase legal immigration and assimilation while cracking down on illegal entry. This will also increase the number of payers into social security to keep pace with beneficiaries.
We will also replace free trade with "Fair Trade". If nations don't play by our rules, we will play by theirs.
We will also implement an energy policy called BAMN By All Means Necessary. We will develop our domestic sources of fossil fuels in a safe and ecological manner while building new solar, nuclear, wind, geothermal, ocean thermal, and tidal power plants. We will rebuild our railway network and move more freight from trucks to trains. We will revive our space program so we can build ten-mile wide sattelite solar power stations in low-Earth orbit to capture the sun's solar energy and beam it to collectors on Earth in the form of microwaves.
Logged
opebo
YaBB God
Posts: 44650
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #2 on:
June 19, 2012, 02:38:44 pm »
Falco? Bist du es?
Logged
Quote from: GM Griffin on May 11, 2013, 11:43:51 pm
opebo is awesome.
Quote from: ?????????? on April 22, 2005, 03:24:06 pm
You are a peice of trash and you disgust me you ignorant louse.
ag
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 5317
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #3 on:
June 19, 2012, 03:16:07 pm »
And I propose a tax on frivolous tax reform proposals. By charging USD$1,000,000,000 everytime one chooses to publicize a tax reform idea without doing numbers first, we'd be able to eliminate much of US budget deficit
)
Logged
opebo
YaBB God
Posts: 44650
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #4 on:
June 19, 2012, 03:52:06 pm »
How about if we only offer proposals which
increase
taxes, ag. No real need to 'do the numbers' in that case.
Logged
Quote from: GM Griffin on May 11, 2013, 11:43:51 pm
opebo is awesome.
Quote from: ?????????? on April 22, 2005, 03:24:06 pm
You are a peice of trash and you disgust me you ignorant louse.
ag
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 5317
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #5 on:
June 19, 2012, 08:55:41 pm »
Quote from: opebo on June 19, 2012, 03:52:06 pm
How about if we only offer proposals which
increase
taxes, ag. No real need to 'do the numbers' in that case.
Actually, in that case I would insist doing the number thrice
Logged
ModerateCoward
seatown
YaBB God
Posts: 3846
Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.30
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #6 on:
June 19, 2012, 10:32:08 pm »
Quote from: ag on June 19, 2012, 03:16:07 pm
And I propose a tax on frivolous tax reform proposals. By charging USD$1,000,000,000 everytime one chooses to publicize a tax reform idea without doing numbers first, we'd be able to eliminate much of US budget deficit
)
You are a fan of the guillotine, eh?
Logged
The CINC
Rookie
Posts: 34
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #7 on:
June 20, 2012, 01:59:02 am »
Now if we need to raise the flat tax rate and VAT to ballance the budget and raise an additional 3% of the GDP to pay down the debt, then we will do so. We will also consider making the first $30,000 or $40,000 earned tax free.
Logged
ag
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 5317
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #8 on:
June 20, 2012, 02:33:28 pm »
Quote from: The CINC on June 20, 2012, 01:59:02 am
Now if we need to raise the flat tax rate ...
If Your Imperial Majesty so order...
Logged
ag
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 5317
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #9 on:
June 20, 2012, 02:34:03 pm »
Quote from: Senator Seatown on June 19, 2012, 10:32:08 pm
Quote from: ag on June 19, 2012, 03:16:07 pm
And I propose a tax on frivolous tax reform proposals. By charging USD$1,000,000,000 everytime one chooses to publicize a tax reform idea without doing numbers first, we'd be able to eliminate much of US budget deficit
)
You are a fan of the guillotine, eh?
For certain types of crime, yes
)
Logged
The CINC
Rookie
Posts: 34
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #10 on:
June 20, 2012, 04:15:43 pm »
I know raising taxes to match spending is not popular but we can't continue spending 26% of the GDP yet paying 21% of our income in taxes. That has resulted in a national debt that is 100% of our GDP. We have to reduce the amount we spend on entitlements, we have to invest in things that make our economy grow, we have to restructure the tax code to encourage production, savings and investment, and all of us are going to have to work longer and harde to build an economy that will run budget surpluses to pay down the national debt.
Logged
opebo
YaBB God
Posts: 44650
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #11 on:
June 21, 2012, 12:31:49 pm »
Quote from: The CINC on June 20, 2012, 04:15:43 pm
We have to reduce the amount we spend on entitlements
But increases in taxation are a reduction in the entitlements of the rich, Cinc.
Logged
Quote from: GM Griffin on May 11, 2013, 11:43:51 pm
opebo is awesome.
Quote from: ?????????? on April 22, 2005, 03:24:06 pm
You are a peice of trash and you disgust me you ignorant louse.
The CINC
Rookie
Posts: 34
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #12 on:
June 21, 2012, 02:21:43 pm »
Quote from: opebo on June 21, 2012, 12:31:49 pm
Quote from: The CINC on June 20, 2012, 04:15:43 pm
We have to reduce the amount we spend on entitlements
But increases in taxation are a reduction in the entitlements of the rich, Cinc.
I don't understand what you are saying, but in the 1990s and early 2000s, there were nations that had higher economic growth rates than we did yet boasted higher tax rates than we did. That is because they were smarter about taxation than us. Their national governments derrived less of a share from the taxation of income and more from the taxation of land and consumption. Even the Eastern European nations which all boast flat tax rates also have a VAT and a land value tax.
My proposed tax code is a modification of the systems used in Eastern Europe today.
Alot of people say high tax rates hamstring the Western European economies, but it is labor restrictions that hamstring them. We call for a more flexible labor market and transforming social security into a "Flexicurity" system where the unemployed are retrained at government expense and sent back into the work force.
Logged
shua
YaBB God
Posts: 7267
Political Matrix
E: 1.16, S: -4.00
Re: Falconomics
«
Reply #13 on:
June 24, 2012, 06:26:15 pm »
Quote from: The CINC on June 20, 2012, 04:15:43 pm
I know raising taxes to match spending is not popular but we can't continue spending 26% of the GDP yet paying 21% of our income in taxes. That has resulted in a national debt that is 100% of our GDP. We have to reduce the amount we spend on entitlements, we have to invest in things that make our economy grow, we have to restructure the tax code to encourage production, savings and investment, and all of us are going to have to work longer and harde to build an economy that will run budget surpluses to pay down the national debt.
so your solution is to spend 40% of GDP?
Logged
"Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. . . But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson
WV SBE v Barnette
http://tinyurl.com/bx359q5
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...