June 2012 Federal Elections Tracker

[tmthforu94]

I can't keep one going, but if someone else does, ill make sure to keep the OP updated so people don't habe to surf.

Thoughts so far?

Ill make a prediction: Tweed will overperform his polling numbers.

As of 2:57 PM EST (last vote being Tender Branson):

Napoleon - 17
Clarence - 15
Oakvale - 8
Tweed - 7

Napoleon - 21
Clarence - 7
Oakvale - 18

Write-in - 1
Napoleon - 19
Oakvale - 15

Napoleon - 19
Oakvale - 16

[Napoleon]

This election, like the previous election, will be all about preference order.

One hour in to the election, we have 18 voters.

Young Tweed- 2
Clarence- 4
Oakvale- 4
Napoleon- 8

Clarence- 4
Oakvale- 5
Napoleon- 9

Oakvale- 7
Napoleon- 11

[Oakvale]

I'd agree Tweed will substantially outperform his polling numbers since a lot of old, inactive Atlasians that are still registered will vote for him. It'll be interesting to see how this turns out.

[CLARENCE 2015!]

This is far more enjoyable then the last election I ran in- for Homeowners Association President-Treasurer

[Napoleon]

Three hours into the election, we have 25 voters.

Young Tweed- 3
Clarence- 5
Oakvale- 6
Napoleon- 11

Clarence- 5
Oakvale- 8
Napoleon- 12

Oakvale- 10
Napoleon- 15

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

As of now, we have 32 voters

Write-in: 1
Young Tweed: 4
Clarence: 6
Oakvale: 7
Napoleon: 14

Young Tweed: 5
Clarence: 6
Oakvale: 7
Napoleon: 14

Clarence: 6
Oakvale: 10
Napoleon: 16

Write-in: 1
Oakvale: 12
Napoleon: 19

Oakvale: 13
Napoleon: 19

I have double- and triple-checked them and those are the numbers as of 6:42, EST. However, the clock on this forum is early an hour. You see it as 5:42.

I have an insatiable urge to talk like a fifties announcer.

[homelycooking]

37 ballots in:

Napoleon/Kalwejt 14
Clarence/Yelnoc 10
Oakvale/Cincinnatus 7
Tweed/bgwah 6

Napoleon/Kalwejt 18
Clarence/Yelnoc 10
Oakvale/Cincinnatus 9

Napoleon/Kalwejt 21
Clarence/Yelnoc 16

Scott 10
Belgian 2

NCYankee 7

Redalgo 4

Ben 5
JCL 2

sbane 7

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Tweed/Bgwah base is yet to turn. This is going to be interesting.

[Adam Griffin]

As of 2:57 PM EST (last vote being Tender Branson):

Napoleon - 17
Clarence - 15
Oakvale - 8
Tweed - 7

Napoleon - 21
Clarence - 7
Oakvale - 18

Write-in - 1
Napoleon - 19
Oakvale - 15

Napoleon - 19
Oakvale - 16

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

How did Tweed's voters give Oakvale 9 votes? And how did Napoleon lose votes?

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

I think Mint's ballot is invalid.

[Adam Griffin]

How did Tweed's voters give Oakvale 9 votes? And how did Napoleon lose votes?

I'm thinking I screwed up. I simply counted them without transfers, which I still don't fully understand.

[TJ in Oregon]

I think Mint's ballot is invalid.

He deleted it and then voted again. I'm not sure whether or not it's legal to do so, so if anyone can prove it though.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

He deleted it and then voted again. I'm not sure whether or not it's legal to do so, so if anyone can prove it though.

Yeah, I'm not sure.  My gut says it's fine if it was within twenty minutes of his original vote, but of course we can't prove exactly when that was.

[TJ in Oregon]

He deleted it and then voted again. I'm not sure whether or not it's legal to do so, so if anyone can prove it though.

Yeah, I'm not sure.  My gut says it's fine if it was within twenty minutes of his original vote, but of course we can't prove exactly when that was.

If it was withing 20 minutes, then why delete it when it could be edited?

Edit: It was not within 20 minutes since the previous vote was before Tweed's and the new one is after.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

If it was withing 20 minutes, then why delete it when it could be edited?

That's also an issue.  It's a messy situation.

Edit: Then the vote is invalidated.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Unless Gustaf or another moderator can check to see if a post was deleted, then the voting law isn't even enforceable...

[CLARENCE 2015!]

Unless Gustaf or another moderator can check to see if a post was deleted, then the voting law isn't even enforceable...

I'm not going to raise a stink about it- This isn't Bush vs. Gore here... but having several credible witnesses ought to mean something

[courts]

Unless Gustaf or another moderator can check to see if a post was deleted, then the voting law isn't even enforceable...

I'm not going to raise a stink about it- This isn't Bush vs. Gore here... but having several credible witnesses ought to mean something

i might have missed that time limit, to be honest i'm not even totally sure so i'm deleting it just to avoid pissing everyone off. sorry everyone.

[ZuWo]

Unless Gustaf or another moderator can check to see if a post was deleted, then the voting law isn't even enforceable...

I'm not going to raise a stink about it- This isn't Bush vs. Gore here... but having several credible witnesses ought to mean something

i might have missed that time limit, to be honest i'm not even totally sure so i'm deleting it just to avoid pissing everyone off. sorry everyone.

This is a sign of strength of character - I applaud you for that!

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Both Tweed and Belgiansocialist appear to be overperforming their poll numbers.

Not bad for a Senate candidate whose platform is actually for inactivity...

[Yelnoc]

Last Voter: Bore
Total Voters: 50
# to win: 26

Notes

• I placed opebo's vote under Napoleon on the word of SoEA homelycooking
• I did not see any votes by Mint, and this did not count any
• I skipped Antonio's write-in vote because the person he voted for did not declare their intention of receiving votes

Round 1

Napoleon (18)
Scott, Nathan, Averroës Nix, Adam Griffin, smoltchanov, Dallasfan65, Tmthforu94, Kalwejt, antwnzrr, Maokai Blue, MilesC56, morgieb, NVTownsend, Alfred F. Jones, Fritz, Franken, Tender Branson, opebo

clarence (15)
clarence, Smid, Jbrase, HagridoftheDeep, Franzl, realisticidealist, Cathcon, SupersonicVenue, RogueBeaver, NHI, MasterSanders, 20RP12, Simfan, Mechaman, Yelnoc

Oakvale (9)
sjoycefla, Snowstalker, hawkeye59, homelycooking, benconstine, 1236, Gustaf, Progressive Realist

Tweed (
Ebowed, Lief, seatown, belgiansocialist, Antonio V, PyroTheFox, Tweed, bore


Round 2

Napoleon (23)
Scott, Nathan, Averroës Nix, Adam Griffin, smoltchanov, Dallasfan65, Tmthforu94, Kalwejt, antwnzrr, Maokai Blue, MilesC56, morgieb, NVTownsend, Alfred F. Jones, Fritz, Franken, Tender Branson, opebo, Lief, belgiansocialist, Antonio V, PyroTheFox, bore

clarence (15)
clarence, Smid, Jbrase, HagridoftheDeep, Franzl, realisticidealist, Cathcon, SupersonicVenue, RogueBeaver, NHI, MasterSanders, 20RP12, Simfan, Mechaman, Yelnoc

Oakvale (11)
sjoycefla, Snowstalker, hawkeye59, homelycooking, benconstine, 1236, Gustaf, Progressive Realist, Ebowed, seatown

exhausted (1)
Tweed


Round 3

Napoleon (26)
Scott, Nathan, Averroës Nix, Adam Griffin, smoltchanov, Dallasfan65, Tmthforu94, Kalwejt, antwnzrr, Maokai Blue, MilesC56, morgieb, NVTownsend, Alfred F. Jones, Fritz, Franken, Tender Branson, opebo, Lief, belgiansocialist, Antonio V, PyroTheFox, bore, 1236, seatown, Ebowed

clarence (22)
clarence, Smid, Jbrase, HagridoftheDeep, Franzl, realisticidealist, Cathcon, SupersonicVenue, RogueBeaver, NHI, MasterSanders, 20RP12, Simfan, Mechaman, Yelnoc, sjoycefla, Snowstalker, hawkeye59, homelycooking, benconstine, Gustaf, Progressive Realist

exhausted (1)
Tweed


Napoleon would win if the election was closed now

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

The Oakmentum seems to have dissipated.

[HagridOfTheDeep]

This could get interesting.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

As of RodPresident, I believe there are 67 votes. 34 are needed to win.

First Round:

Napoleon: 26
Clarence: 19
Oakvale: 13
Tweed: 9

Second Round:

Napoleon: 32
Clarence: 19
Oakvale: 15

Final Round:

Napoleon: 40 ELECTED
Clarence: 26