Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 17, 2017, 02:29:50 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash, Agamemnon Busmalis)
| | |-+  Which are the most developed majority non-white countries?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Which are the most developed majority non-white countries?  (Read 5779 times)
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9540
United States


View Profile
« on: June 24, 2012, 10:41:19 am »
Ignore

Japan would certainly be up there.
Logged



"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4942
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2012, 10:46:35 am »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top
Logged

Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28473


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2012, 10:52:26 am »
Ignore

Depends on how one defines developed and non-white, I guess. But reasonably, Japan and Singapore seem like the obvious choices.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7491
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2012, 11:01:42 am »
Ignore

Singapore, by any objective measure. Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Taiwan are also up there.
Logged

Great Again V: The Reich Shall Rise Again
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8146


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2012, 11:16:04 am »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index
« Last Edit: June 24, 2012, 11:30:57 am by One nation under Zod »Logged

Quote
We will immediately repeal and replace ObamaCare - and nobody can do that like me. We will save $'s and have much better healthcare!

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 9, 2016

Quote
Obama's complaints about Republicans stopping his agenda are BS since he had full control for two years. He can never take responsibility.

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 26, 2012
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27666
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2012, 11:20:50 am »
Ignore

Italy?


I kid I kid.


Could any of the smaller emirates on the Arabian Peninsula make a case?




...and on preview I see that yes, a case could be made for several of them.
Logged

“To oppose something is to maintain it.
They say here "all roads lead to Mishnory." To be sure, if you turn your back on Mishnory and walk away from it, you are still on the Mishnory road. To oppose vulgarity is inevitably to be vulgar. You must go somewhere else; you must have another goal; then you walk in a different road.”
― Ursula K. Le Guin, The Left Hand of Darkness
ag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12346


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2012, 11:50:14 am »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Logged

This is the year which people will talk about
This is the year which people will be silent about.
The old see the young die.
The foolish see the wise die.

The earth no longer produces, it devours.
The sky hurls down no rain, only iron.

Bertolt Brecht
ag
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12346


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2012, 11:53:15 am »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:
12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

So, if you include political development, it leaves Japan, South Korea and Barbados.
Logged

This is the year which people will talk about
This is the year which people will be silent about.
The old see the young die.
The foolish see the wise die.

The earth no longer produces, it devours.
The sky hurls down no rain, only iron.

Bertolt Brecht
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16321
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 24, 2012, 12:26:36 pm »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

I would have thought Taiwan would be up there as well.  What's holding it back? 
Logged

Јas
Jas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10150
Zambia


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 24, 2012, 12:42:33 pm »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

I would have thought Taiwan would be up there as well.  What's holding it back? 

Non-membership of the UN.
Were it so, it'd rank between S Korea and Singapore.
Logged
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21051


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2012, 01:16:19 pm »
Ignore

Interesting that Japan was #1 as recently as 1993, it has since dropped to #12.
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16371
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 24, 2012, 06:48:35 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12706
Ireland, Republic of


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 26, 2012, 05:32:40 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Lol wut?
Logged



Quote
Keith R Laws ‏@Keith_Laws  Feb 4
As I have noted before 'paradigm shift' is an anagram of 'grasp dim faith'
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10231
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2012, 06:17:00 pm »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index
Different cases. Chile is Mestizo majority, so non-white. Argentina is "whiter" than the US and NZ.

Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16371
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: June 27, 2012, 01:46:44 am »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Lol wut?
Categories have bounds. Without them, they fall apart faster.
Logged
Nice Guy FF
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7621
United States


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 27, 2012, 04:28:30 am »
Ignore

Does Israel count as a non-white nation?
Logged

Why should I even have a signature?
Great Again V: The Reich Shall Rise Again
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8146


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 27, 2012, 05:18:56 am »
Ignore

Different cases. Chile is Mestizo majority, so non-white. Argentina is "whiter" than the US and NZ.

Chile is definitely debatable, because I found very conflicting numbers on this. According to a survey from 2011, 59% of all Chileans define themselves as "white", 25% as "mestizo" and 8% as "indigenous". Since human "races" mostly exist as a social construct, one could argue that you're white as soon as you claim you're white.

A genetic study from 1994 also stated: "At present the Chilean population is approximately 64% white and 35% Amerindian with traces of other admixture." (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1050080/pdf/jmedgene00288-0042.pdf)
Logged

Quote
We will immediately repeal and replace ObamaCare - and nobody can do that like me. We will save $'s and have much better healthcare!

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 9, 2016

Quote
Obama's complaints about Republicans stopping his agenda are BS since he had full control for two years. He can never take responsibility.

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 26, 2012
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9540
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 27, 2012, 08:51:30 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Regardless of the technical definition, as the starter of this thread, I meant socially/politically (i.e. democracy) and economically developed.
Logged



"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16371
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2012, 09:24:35 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Regardless of the technical definition, as the starter of this thread, I meant socially/politically (i.e. democracy) and economically developed.
I think then you are trying to fit too many things into a single concept. If you want to ask which countries are most democratic, that's one thing (and is complicated enough by itself). But economic development is something else (also a complex mix of things that has often been critiqued as a narrow-minded construct). I think there have been too many counterexamples through history and even today to sustain the idea that the two go hand-in-hand.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines