Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2015, 07:07:49 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  International General Discussion (Moderators: Peter, afleitch)
| | |-+  Which are the most developed majority non-white countries?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Which are the most developed majority non-white countries?  (Read 3055 times)
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8979
United States


View Profile
« on: June 24, 2012, 10:41:19 am »
Ignore

Japan would certainly be up there.
Logged



[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4764
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2012, 10:46:35 am »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top
Logged

Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27377


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2012, 10:52:26 am »
Ignore

Depends on how one defines developed and non-white, I guess. But reasonably, Japan and Singapore seem like the obvious choices.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6529
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2012, 11:01:42 am »
Ignore

Singapore, by any objective measure. Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Taiwan are also up there.
Logged

The update is like if Oscar Wilde wrote a parody of an Horatio Alger novel.
I want my friggin hoverboard!
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6165


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2012, 11:16:04 am »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index
« Last Edit: June 24, 2012, 11:30:57 am by One nation under Zod »Logged
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22922
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2012, 11:20:50 am »
Ignore

Italy?


I kid I kid.


Could any of the smaller emirates on the Arabian Peninsula make a case?




...and on preview I see that yes, a case could be made for several of them.
Logged

I believe the simple truth is that they became somewhat alarmed when they realized that I really meant to write what I believed. There is a peculiar parallel between some of our great Northern "liberals" and some of our outstanding Southern liberals.

Some of the people in both classes share the deep-seated convictions that only their convictions can possibly be the right ones. They both inevitably say the same thing: "We know the Negro and what is best for him."
ag
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7317


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2012, 11:50:14 am »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Logged

PVEM: We exterminate koalas.
ag
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7317


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2012, 11:53:15 am »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:
12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

So, if you include political development, it leaves Japan, South Korea and Barbados.
Logged

PVEM: We exterminate koalas.
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14053
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 24, 2012, 12:26:36 pm »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

I would have thought Taiwan would be up there as well.  What's holding it back? 
Logged

Јas
Jas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9875
Malawi


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 24, 2012, 12:42:33 pm »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

I would have thought Taiwan would be up there as well.  What's holding it back? 

Non-membership of the UN.
Were it so, it'd rank between S Korea and Singapore.
Logged

Funny 'cause it's true:
Very few people seriously allow facts to affect their opinions.

Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17073


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2012, 01:16:19 pm »
Ignore

Interesting that Japan was #1 as recently as 1993, it has since dropped to #12.
Logged

A New Chapter

"I feel like Paulette Revere the recession is coming, the recession is coming! - Hillary Clinton, April 3, 2008
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13250
Nepal


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 24, 2012, 06:48:35 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.
Logged

Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12039
Ireland, Republic of


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 26, 2012, 05:32:40 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Lol wut?
Logged



Quote
Keith R Laws ‏@Keith_Laws  Feb 4
As I have noted before 'paradigm shift' is an anagram of 'grasp dim faith'
Charlotte Hebdo
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8682
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2012, 06:17:00 pm »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index
Different cases. Chile is Mestizo majority, so non-white. Argentina is "whiter" than the US and NZ.

Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13250
Nepal


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: June 27, 2012, 01:46:44 am »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Lol wut?
Categories have bounds. Without them, they fall apart faster.
Logged

Discombobulated Melancholy
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6376
United States


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 27, 2012, 04:28:30 am »
Ignore

Does Israel count as a non-white nation?
Logged

Are you one?
I want my friggin hoverboard!
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6165


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 27, 2012, 05:18:56 am »
Ignore

Different cases. Chile is Mestizo majority, so non-white. Argentina is "whiter" than the US and NZ.

Chile is definitely debatable, because I found very conflicting numbers on this. According to a survey from 2011, 59% of all Chileans define themselves as "white", 25% as "mestizo" and 8% as "indigenous". Since human "races" mostly exist as a social construct, one could argue that you're white as soon as you claim you're white.

A genetic study from 1994 also stated: "At present the Chilean population is approximately 64% white and 35% Amerindian with traces of other admixture." (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1050080/pdf/jmedgene00288-0042.pdf)
Logged
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8979
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 27, 2012, 08:51:30 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Regardless of the technical definition, as the starter of this thread, I meant socially/politically (i.e. democracy) and economically developed.
Logged



[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13250
Nepal


View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2012, 09:24:35 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Regardless of the technical definition, as the starter of this thread, I meant socially/politically (i.e. democracy) and economically developed.
I think then you are trying to fit too many things into a single concept. If you want to ask which countries are most democratic, that's one thing (and is complicated enough by itself). But economic development is something else (also a complex mix of things that has often been critiqued as a narrow-minded construct). I think there have been too many counterexamples through history and even today to sustain the idea that the two go hand-in-hand.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines