Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 22, 2014, 01:30:03 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  International General Discussion (Moderators: Peter, afleitch)
| | |-+  Which are the most developed majority non-white countries?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Which are the most developed majority non-white countries?  (Read 2111 times)
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8825


View Profile
« on: June 24, 2012, 10:41:19 am »
Ignore

Japan would certainly be up there.
Logged



[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

President John Hay
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4731
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2012, 10:46:35 am »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top
Logged

Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26905


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2012, 10:52:26 am »
Ignore

Depends on how one defines developed and non-white, I guess. But reasonably, Japan and Singapore seem like the obvious choices.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6329
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2012, 11:01:42 am »
Ignore

Singapore, by any objective measure. Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Taiwan are also up there.
Logged

Breaking hearts and minds
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5972


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2012, 11:16:04 am »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index
« Last Edit: June 24, 2012, 11:30:57 am by One nation under Zod »Logged
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22531
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2012, 11:20:50 am »
Ignore

Italy?


I kid I kid.


Could any of the smaller emirates on the Arabian Peninsula make a case?




...and on preview I see that yes, a case could be made for several of them.
Logged

ag
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6372


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2012, 11:50:14 am »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Logged
ag
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6372


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 24, 2012, 11:53:15 am »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:
12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

So, if you include political development, it leaves Japan, South Korea and Barbados.
Logged
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13613
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 24, 2012, 12:26:36 pm »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

I would have thought Taiwan would be up there as well.  What's holding it back? 
Logged

Јas
Jas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9804
Malawi


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 24, 2012, 12:42:33 pm »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

I would have thought Taiwan would be up there as well.  What's holding it back? 

Non-membership of the UN.
Were it so, it'd rank between S Korea and Singapore.
Logged

Funny 'cause it's true:
Very few people seriously allow facts to affect their opinions.

Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16058


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 24, 2012, 01:16:19 pm »
Ignore

Interesting that Japan was #1 as recently as 1993, it has since dropped to #12.
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11671
Russian Federation


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 24, 2012, 06:48:35 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.
Logged

Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11396
Ireland, Republic of


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 26, 2012, 05:32:40 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Lol wut?
Logged



Quote
Keith R Laws ‏@Keith_Laws  Feb 4
As I have noted before 'paradigm shift' is an anagram of 'grasp dim faith'
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4925
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2012, 06:17:00 pm »
Ignore

According to the UN's Human Development Index, the "majority non-white" (I'll translate it as non-European descent) countries with a "very high development" are:

12. Japan
13. Hong Kong
15. South Korea
26. Singapore
30. United Arab Emirates
33. Brunei
37. Qatar
42. Bahrain
47. Barbados

Chile and Argentina are also in the "very high development" category, but under my definition their populations are in fact "majority white".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index
Different cases. Chile is Mestizo majority, so non-white. Argentina is "whiter" than the US and NZ.

Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11671
Russian Federation


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: June 27, 2012, 01:46:44 am »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Lol wut?
Categories have bounds. Without them, they fall apart faster.
Logged

18 remain
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6067
United States


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 27, 2012, 04:28:30 am »
Ignore

Does Israel count as a non-white nation?
Logged
Breaking hearts and minds
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5972


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 27, 2012, 05:18:56 am »
Ignore

Different cases. Chile is Mestizo majority, so non-white. Argentina is "whiter" than the US and NZ.

Chile is definitely debatable, because I found very conflicting numbers on this. According to a survey from 2011, 59% of all Chileans define themselves as "white", 25% as "mestizo" and 8% as "indigenous". Since human "races" mostly exist as a social construct, one could argue that you're white as soon as you claim you're white.

A genetic study from 1994 also stated: "At present the Chilean population is approximately 64% white and 35% Amerindian with traces of other admixture." (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1050080/pdf/jmedgene00288-0042.pdf)
Logged
nclib
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8825


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 27, 2012, 08:51:30 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Regardless of the technical definition, as the starter of this thread, I meant socially/politically (i.e. democracy) and economically developed.
Logged



[George W. Bush] has shattered the myth of white supremacy once and for all. -- Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)

"George Bush supports abstinence. Lucky Laura."
- sign seen at the March for Women's Lives, 4/25/04

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11671
Russian Federation


View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2012, 09:24:35 pm »
Ignore

Singapore would probably be on top

Only as long as you disregard its political system: it happens to be a non-democracy. Economic development isn't everything, you know.
Development is an economic concept.

Regardless of the technical definition, as the starter of this thread, I meant socially/politically (i.e. democracy) and economically developed.
I think then you are trying to fit too many things into a single concept. If you want to ask which countries are most democratic, that's one thing (and is complicated enough by itself). But economic development is something else (also a complex mix of things that has often been critiqued as a narrow-minded construct). I think there have been too many counterexamples through history and even today to sustain the idea that the two go hand-in-hand.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines