Opinion of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner

[You kip if you want to...]

Discuss.

[Redalgo]

I hold her in higher esteem than the Peróns but think less of her than Brazil's Dilma Rousseff. She would be a FF to me if not for her nationalism, corporatist ideology, bad habit of indulging vain and extravagant tastes of hers in maintaining appearances, social conservatism on a handful of issues, and inappropriate stance on the Falklands matter.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Argentina is clearly better off since the Kirchners took over. I don't know her policies very well, but I'm pretty sure I'd vote for her in the context.

[Zioneer]

Her pointless nationalism over The Falklands/Las Malvinas is incredibly irritating, and from what I've heard, her economic policies don't seem to going as well as she wants them to (which is why she's raising a fuss about that specific piece of land anyway). So HP, or at least AP (annoying person).

[You kip if you want to...]

The fact she's quickly becoming the British right-wing's new bogeyman (or, I should say, bogeywoman) naturally endeares her to me.

[Kevin]

HP

[BritishDixie]

Just........a........moron.

[Supersonic]

The Evil Queen of Botox.

[Velasco]

Cristina is more an HP than a FF for me. In fact she's a bit authoritarian. I won't vote here because I don't like the polls with only two opposite options but, above all, because there are Argentinian politicians that are even worse. I hate all of them with few exceptions like Hermes Binner, the PS leader, who doesn't seem one of the clan: he's very discreet and polite, seems to be honest and he's not a demagogue . So, in Argentina I'd vote for the Broad Progressive Front, and excuse me for the hacking.

[Hash]

I could really do without her mindless sabre-rattling outdated nationalism, but she's otherwise a fairly decent leader though I'm not a huge fan of her style in general. I have no clue who I'd have voted for last year. Neither HP nor FF.