Imagine if the states had parliaments
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 01:44:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Imagine if the states had parliaments
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Imagine if the states had parliaments  (Read 443 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,070
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 04, 2012, 06:24:32 PM »

Something that came to me. Let's imagine all 50 states had parliamentary systems instead of state legislatures, and thus could hold elections at any time instead of all 50 at once, like Canadian provinces and Australian states. We'll assume the maximum time between elections is 4 years. That's 48 months, meaning we'd have more than one election a month on average!

I do wonder though how many would be interesting, obviously Idaho and Massachusetts wouldn't be...unless the local Republicans/Democrats in each state split, which is most certainly possible. Actually I'd expect that currently ultra-Republican states would have to run against some type of Tea Party-esque splinter. I can see Kansas and Alaska having elections between some type of "Tea Party" and the Republicans, who on the local election would actually be closer to the state Democratic parties.
Logged
BlueDog Bimble
Rookie
**
Posts: 23
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 05, 2012, 03:28:15 AM »

Something that came to me. Let's imagine all 50 states had parliamentary systems instead of state legislatures, and thus could hold elections at any time instead of all 50 at once, like Canadian provinces and Australian states. We'll assume the maximum time between elections is 4 years. That's 48 months, meaning we'd have more than one election a month on average!

I do wonder though how many would be interesting, obviously Idaho and Massachusetts wouldn't be...unless the local Republicans/Democrats in each state split, which is most certainly possible. Actually I'd expect that currently ultra-Republican states would have to run against some type of Tea Party-esque splinter. I can see Kansas and Alaska having elections between some type of "Tea Party" and the Republicans, who on the local election would actually be closer to the state Democratic parties.

With states like Idaho and Massachusetts, this isn't necessarily true, if you examine Albertan provincial elections since 1971.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,945


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2012, 03:42:17 AM »
« Edited: July 05, 2012, 03:46:08 AM by Lief »

I doubt many stats would have party systems dramatically different from the Democrat/Republican one. Look at Germany for example, where the state party systems are (more or less) identical to the national one, with the exception of smaller parties here and there that win a few seats (like SSW or Freie Wähler).

Though you do already see some unique party systems in the American states, like in Vermont with the Progressive Party or "coalition governments" supported by break-away factions, like in Alaska.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.213 seconds with 12 queries.