Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 29, 2014, 12:17:23 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Individual Politics (Moderators: Grad Students are the Worst, Torie, Sheriff Buford TX Justice)
| | |-+  Opinion of the Australian system for electing party leaders
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Huh
Freedom System   -4 (26.7%)
Horrible System   -11 (73.3%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 15

Author Topic: Opinion of the Australian system for electing party leaders  (Read 719 times)
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8638
United Kingdom


View Profile
« on: July 04, 2012, 07:50:26 pm »
Ignore

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership_spill

Horrendous system.

The constant revolving door of leaders on the federal and state level is a joke!
Logged

RogueBeaver
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14192
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2012, 08:51:38 pm »
Ignore

Horrendous system. Use a delegated convention.
Logged

7.35, 3.65

« Les plus nobles principes du monde ne valent que par l’action.  » - Charles de Gaulle



Is it excessive to hold a politician's feet to the fire for giving his base the run around at every turn?
morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5298
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2012, 04:06:03 am »
Ignore

Without it Abbott would never have gotten momentum, so HS.
Logged
Vosem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5169
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2012, 05:31:19 pm »
Ignore

Any member being able to start a spill is a little extreme, but FS on the whole.
Logged

I apologize for being so adamantly right.
RogueBeaver
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14192
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2012, 06:08:30 pm »
Ignore

Any member being able to start a spill is a little extreme, but FS on the whole.

I'll modify what I said earlier. To have the leader elected solely by caucus under normal circumstances is a bad idea. Membership should get a say too. But caucus should definitely have a right to replace the leader if they feel it necessary, hence why the idea of spills is a good one. But use them sparingly. Replacing Hawke with Keating and Turnbull with Abbott were good ideas and absolutely necessary. What the Liberals did in the '80s and Lab in the past decade were horrible ideas. Is there a credible reason? Is there a credible challenger? Is the challenger a proven quantity who can outperform the incumbent? Only if all those conditions are fulfilled do you pull the trigger.
Logged

7.35, 3.65

« Les plus nobles principes du monde ne valent que par l’action.  » - Charles de Gaulle



Is it excessive to hold a politician's feet to the fire for giving his base the run around at every turn?
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56410
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2012, 08:11:20 pm »
Ignore

Not very democratic, to say the least. But you'd have a revolving door leader situation no matter what system, because that's what Australian political culture is like.
Logged

"I have become entangled in my own data, and my conclusion stands in direct contradiction to the initial idea from which I started. Proceeding from unlimited freedom, I end with unlimited despotism. I will add, however, that there can be no solution of the social formula except mine."
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5033
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: 0.35


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2012, 09:00:33 am »
Ignore

Not a very good system to say the least.
Logged

Being a Libertarian is like having a fever, either you sweat it out or you die from it.
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8638
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2012, 09:12:23 am »
Ignore

Not very democratic, to say the least. But you'd have a revolving door leader situation no matter what system, because that's what Australian political culture is like.

But I guess that's a chicken and egg thing. Is the culture like that because it's so easy to get rid of the leader?
Logged

morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5298
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2012, 09:14:27 am »
Ignore

Not very democratic, to say the least. But you'd have a revolving door leader situation no matter what system, because that's what Australian political culture is like.

But I guess that's a chicken and egg thing. Is the culture like that because it's so easy to get rid of the leader?

Yes, plus everyone is so focused on opinion polls down under.
Logged
BlueDog Bumble
Rookie
*
Posts: 20
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2012, 09:20:39 am »
Ignore

I've noticed from my cursory knowledge of Australian politics that most Australian party leaders seem to fall in leadership challenges, whereas this virtually never happens in Canadian politics (the only case I can think of where this happened was when Stockwell Day defeated Preston Manning for the leadership of the CA).
Logged

Economic score: +5.03
Social score: +1.74

"Every human being makes mistakes"

"A tree's a tree. How many more do you need to look at?"

"Canada is the only country founded on the relentless pursuit of the rodent"
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8638
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: July 06, 2012, 09:30:34 am »
Ignore

I've noticed from my cursory knowledge of Australian politics that most Australian party leaders seem to fall in leadership challenges, whereas this virtually never happens in Canadian politics (the only case I can think of where this happened was when Stockwell Day defeated Preston Manning for the leadership of the CA).

It's only ever really happened to Heath and Thatcher in the UK as well (in a direct, open challenge).
Logged

Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8146
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: July 06, 2012, 10:40:20 am »
Ignore

Objectively hilarious.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8638
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: July 06, 2012, 12:48:36 pm »
Ignore

Objectively hilarious.


This too, of course.
Logged

PASOK Leader Hashemite
Hashemite
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31364
South Africa



View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: July 06, 2012, 04:57:36 pm »
Ignore

I've noticed from my cursory knowledge of Australian politics that most Australian party leaders seem to fall in leadership challenges, whereas this virtually never happens in Canadian politics (the only case I can think of where this happened was when Stockwell Day defeated Preston Manning for the leadership of the CA).

PC 1983? Alliance 2002?
Logged

BlueDog Bumble
Rookie
*
Posts: 20
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: July 07, 2012, 09:31:39 am »
Ignore

I've noticed from my cursory knowledge of Australian politics that most Australian party leaders seem to fall in leadership challenges, whereas this virtually never happens in Canadian politics (the only case I can think of where this happened was when Stockwell Day defeated Preston Manning for the leadership of the CA).

PC 1983? Alliance 2002?

Ah yes I remember the Alliance in '02. But it's not really the same in 1983, as Clark himself called the election, rather being forced into one like say in Britain in 1990 with Thatcher.
Logged

Economic score: +5.03
Social score: +1.74

"Every human being makes mistakes"

"A tree's a tree. How many more do you need to look at?"

"Canada is the only country founded on the relentless pursuit of the rodent"
Platypus
hughento
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21450
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2012, 06:42:44 am »
Ignore

Not ideal, but dynamism is important, and it has managed to keep the Presidentialisation of Australian politics vaguely in check...vaguely...
Logged

only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58778
India


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2012, 04:00:46 am »
Ignore

Evidently spills wouldn't be called as often if they weren't as likely to succeed even if the rules were what they are. In Germany party leaders have to be reelected every year (at a convention - this silly confusion of party and caucus leadership in English-tradition parliaments is hard to wrap your mind around) and how often are they actually challenged? Not often. Instead, we read the tealeaves on their reelection with only 83% Yes votes.
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines