Public Office of the Napoleon-Nathan Administration

[Donerail]

To which micronation and/or forum shall Cathcon be appointed ambassador to?

[Donerail]

To which micronation and/or forum shall Cathcon be appointed ambassador to?

None.

Then the Diplomatic Missions Act does not apply.

[Donerail]

To which micronation and/or forum shall Cathcon be appointed ambassador to?

None.

Then the Diplomatic Missions Act does not apply.

Nowhere in the act is the President required to specify.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Notice the bolded words. It says an Ambassador may be appointed to a specific nation, and there can be multiple Ambassadors, one per said nation. Also the use of the term "said" means you're going to have to say it.

[Donerail]

How about appointing Cathcon as "ambassador at-large"? That'd solve all problems.

That's what I am trying to communicate; the law doesn't require specifying a particular nation and I would like to have Cathcon around just in case a situation arises. He can be of assistance in other ways in the meantime.

Your argument would have more credit if you weren't using a completely inapplicable act on appointing specific ambassadors to specific other forums as a pretense for overturning the Foreign Policy Reform Act of 2012.

[Donerail]

How about appointing Cathcon as "ambassador at-large"? That'd solve all problems.

That's what I am trying to communicate; the law doesn't require specifying a particular nation and I would like to have Cathcon around just in case a situation arises. He can be of assistance in other ways in the meantime.

Your argument would have more credit if you weren't using a completely inapplicable act on appointing specific ambassadors to specific other forums as a pretense for overturning the Foreign Policy Reform Act of 2012.

Why would I want to overturn my own creation, Sam?

Your own creation?

Sponsor: Ben

[Donerail]

How about appointing Cathcon as "ambassador at-large"? That'd solve all problems.

That's what I am trying to communicate; the law doesn't require specifying a particular nation and I would like to have Cathcon around just in case a situation arises. He can be of assistance in other ways in the meantime.

Your argument would have more credit if you weren't using a completely inapplicable act on appointing specific ambassadors to specific other forums as a pretense for overturning the Foreign Policy Reform Act of 2012.

Why would I want to overturn my own creation, Sam?

In light of recent knowledge, I don't know, I'm not you, but you sure are trying to.