HockeyDude really hates poor people. Stunningly so.
What does my opinion whether I'd like the Jesus story to be real or not have ANYTHING to do with poor people? I'm just making a point that revealing a truth needed for salvation would be better served in a more advanced society at the time.
The problem is your notion that, apparently, urban people are superior the rural, or that the literate to the illiterate. There are points to be made against Christianity, but a constant slamming of its founders for being impoverished and uneducated (and considering Jesus had knowledge backwards and forwards of the OT scriptures, even that is a questionable premise) comes off as very, very arrogant. Besides, you'd be hard-pressed to find a theologian in a higher social position in the 50s or 60s of the Common Era than Paul, who was very literate and well-educated and wrote about a third of the NT. (I'll give you Seneca, but that's about it for that generation).
Jesus appeared to the Jews because he had to. The Messiah was to be a descendant of David, to be born in David's hometown of Bethlehem, to be heralded by Elijah, to begin his ministry at the Mount of Olives to come to Jerusalem via donkey, to "suddenly come to his Temple" and purify the priesthood, etc. Not much time to sail up and down the Yangtze preaching when one has a checklist of Messianic obligations to fulfill.
EDIT: Nathan, you're a sophisticated Christian. Do you subscribe to the idea of "Heaven" as a place where good people go, or are you an old-school by the book "the dead are sleeping and will awaken and experience resurrection in flesh at the End of Days, New Jerusalem will be on Earth, etc." type? The former notion is so out of touch with the Scripture it's almost unbelievable.