Rick Perry ‘proudly’ refuses health care to 1.2 million low-income Texans
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:50:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Rick Perry ‘proudly’ refuses health care to 1.2 million low-income Texans
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: Will Texas implement the Medicaid expansion in the end?
#1
Yes
 
#2
Partially
 
#3
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 40

Author Topic: Rick Perry ‘proudly’ refuses health care to 1.2 million low-income Texans  (Read 4243 times)
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,272
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: May 29, 2013, 11:45:19 PM »

This travesty that some claim to be happening has just been voted by a bunch of media and academia lib's that Texas is the # 1 state. CNBC

Number one in the availability low-paying service and retail jobs, perhaps. That, however, is useless should you posses even a molecule of self respect. We are probably number one for most regressive tax system...which naturally appeals to businesses.

I love Texas, but to be honest - it's a socioeconomic wasteland. The wealthy come to Texas to take advantage of its regressive economic culture. The working people only stay because they love their state on a quasi patriotic level.

So long as we empower people like Rick Perry to thumb his nose at federal legislation that benefits the poor, Texas will never change.

Let's be fair, Perdie. Someone who's poor and fat in Texas is going to be poor and fat anywhere else too. Poor people everywhere are less mobile than rich people because they tend to work in service jobs that aren't portable and that are basically the same everywhere. If they weren't working at Wal-Mart here, they'd be working at Wal-Mart in some other state that isn't Vermont, so why move at all? They also don't have the luxury of abandoning their social capital by moving away from friends and family and leaving themselves with no social/financial safety net.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: May 30, 2013, 09:28:40 AM »

Those types can self-deport to California and take their problems with them.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: May 30, 2013, 09:32:32 AM »

Those types can self-deport to California and take their problems with them.

And therein lies the problem of Federalism. That is no way to run a railroad. We are one nation, and states generating externalities and distortions, and handing out bribes to keep industries and so forth in a race to the bottom in more ways than one, creates economic distortions, and wastes money, by the rail car full.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: May 30, 2013, 12:43:48 PM »

Those types can self-deport to California and take their problems with them.

And therein lies the problem of Federalism. That is no way to run a railroad. We are one nation, and states generating externalities and distortions, and handing out bribes to keep industries and so forth in a race to the bottom in more ways than one, creates economic distortions, and wastes money, by the rail car full.

Incidentally, externalities, distortions, and bribes are commonplace in the Washington DC morass, as unscrupulous individuals dispatch lobbyists to leech money. It is no coincidence that Washington DC borders many of the wealthiest counties in the United States as they serve as breeding grounds for parasites.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: May 30, 2013, 02:54:49 PM »

This travesty that some claim to be happening has just been voted by a bunch of media and academia lib's that Texas is the # 1 state. CNBC

Number one in the availability low-paying service and retail jobs, perhaps. That, however, is useless should you posses even a molecule of self respect. We are probably number one for most regressive tax system...which naturally appeals to businesses.

I love Texas, but to be honest - it's a socioeconomic wasteland. The wealthy come to Texas to take advantage of its regressive economic culture. The working people only stay because they love their state on a quasi patriotic level.

So long as we empower people like Rick Perry to thumb his nose at federal legislation that benefits the poor, Texas will never change.

Let's be fair, Perdie. Someone who's poor and fat in Texas is going to be poor and fat anywhere else too. Poor people everywhere are less mobile than rich people because they tend to work in service jobs that aren't portable and that are basically the same everywhere. If they weren't working at Wal-Mart here, they'd be working at Wal-Mart in some other state that isn't Vermont, so why move at all? They also don't have the luxury of abandoning their social capital by moving away from friends and family and leaving themselves with no social/financial safety net.

The poor have less economic mobility than the rich, true. However, there is more than the factors of economic mobility at work in Texas.

Most Texans believe that they are residing in some sort of economic promised land because there is no income tax and, in no small part, thanks to the constant media sunshine swindle proclaiming a "Texas miracle". In short, Texas isn't Michigan -- a majority of our people approve of Texas' economic regressivism and will vote in its defense whenever presented with an opportunity.

Also, I disagree that low-wage workers in Texas would automatically be thrust into low-wage positions if they moved their labor to another state. Texas has a distinct lack of professional entry-level job availability that forces qualified workers down the ladder and, therefore, everyone beneath them down the ladder as well. A CVS cashier in Texas could easily be a data entry clerk or a receptionist in another state.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 15 queries.