Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2013, 01:43:38 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderators: Emsworth, True Federalist)
| | |-+  anyone heard this argument before
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: anyone heard this argument before  (Read 785 times)
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2055
United States


View Profile
« on: July 10, 2012, 07:12:34 pm »
Ignore

I've met plenty of fundies before and argued with them. One thing I've heard them say is that the point of the separation of church and state is to keep the state out of the church not the church out of the state.

Anyone heard this argument before? What's your view on it?
Logged
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21479
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2012, 07:29:46 pm »

Yes I have.  I'm not a fundamentalist, but I wholeheartedly agree with it.  One of the reasons why religion has thrived here in the States even as it has precipitously declined in Europe is that our churches are not state sponsored.  The pastors and denominations can't count on getting paid via taxes but actually have to make what they say relevant to the laity.
Logged

“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
                Clinton Lee Scott

Read Fat Man on a Diet, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
CathKhan
Cathcon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11021
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2012, 10:52:20 am »
Ignore

The point for the Jeffersonian idea of separation was that neither interferred with the other. Not one gets priority over the other like both sides might argue. Church stays out of government matters, government stays out of church matters. No established churches, no taxes going to churches, no government controlling who gets what religious job, no church saying who gets what political job, etc.
Logged


You are God.

God (R-MI).

1996: Listen dawg, we got some crazy @$$ sh#t goin' on over here, nawhadahmean? C'mon over!
HagridOfTheDeep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3316
Canada


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.70

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2012, 09:03:58 pm »
Ignore

I generally agree with Cathcon, but I think it's important to distinguish between Church and God. While Church and State may be separate to make sure neither entity interferes in the administration of the other, I don't believe anyone ever intended God to be precluded from government.
Logged

asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8981


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2012, 11:34:49 pm »
Ignore

I generally agree with Cathcon, but I think it's important to distinguish between Church and God. While Church and State may be separate to make sure neither entity interferes in the administration of the other, I don't believe anyone ever intended God to be precluded from government.

Well, no. We want folks to vote and govern according to their beliefs and core values. The way this works in America means that we come late to much-needed change sometimes, but on the whole I'd say it's been immensely good for us as a polity and a people.
Logged

Professor Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7245
Colombia


Political Matrix
E: 1.16, S: -4.00

View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2012, 04:58:53 pm »
Ignore

I've met plenty of fundies before and argued with them. One thing I've heard them say is that the point of the separation of church and state is to keep the state out of the church not the church out of the state.

Anyone heard this argument before? What's your view on it?
It sounds like a nonsense statement. You can't have the church be part of the state and have the state be kept out of the church.
Logged

"Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. . . But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette

http://tinyurl.com/bx359q5
The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14073


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -1.22

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2012, 03:00:42 pm »
Ignore

It makes a lot of sense.  Try to imagine Congress confirming the appointment of Bishops of the United American Church.  Or Congressmen trying to weasel themselves a nice cushy bishopric as a retirement sinecure.
Logged

Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53003
Norway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2012, 04:04:40 pm »
Ignore

It makes a lot of sense.  Try to imagine Congress confirming the appointment of Bishops of the United American Church.  Or Congressmen trying to weasel themselves a nice cushy bishopric as a retirement sinecure.

Which is exactly what would happen. Because it would be America.
Logged

'Gentlemen, a desert. A place of savage reference for the good people of Ohio. A place to fear and love. A blasted region. Something to remind us what we hewed out of. A place without malls. An Other for Ohio's Self. Cacti and scorpions and the sun bearing down. Desolation. A place for people to wander alone. To reflect. Away from everything. Gentlemen, a desert.'
CathKhan
Cathcon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11021
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2012, 10:24:30 pm »
Ignore

It makes a lot of sense.  Try to imagine Congress confirming the appointment of Bishops of the United American Church.  Or Congressmen trying to weasel themselves a nice cushy bishopric as a retirement sinecure.

Were I a Congressman, I'd definitely go for the latter.
Logged


You are God.

God (R-MI).

1996: Listen dawg, we got some crazy @$$ sh#t goin' on over here, nawhadahmean? C'mon over!
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory