Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 24, 2014, 04:29:53 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs?
| | |-+  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderators: Bacon King, Dallasfan65)
| | | |-+  1980: Reagan/Bush (R) vs. Carter/Mondale (D) vs. Anderson/Kennedy (I)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: 1980: Reagan/Bush (R) vs. Carter/Mondale (D) vs. Anderson/Kennedy (I)  (Read 1366 times)
#Ready4Nixon
Cathcon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15339
United States


View Profile
« on: July 15, 2012, 09:02:04 am »
Ignore

Kennedy is still so pissed at Carter that he defects to Anderson. With the liberal wings of both parties coming out in full force for the independent ticket and Anderson's newfound polling improvements giving him a chance at taking swing voters and independents, how does the election go?
Logged

Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2484
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2012, 05:33:01 pm »
Ignore

Well, ignoring the fact that no Kennedy would take vp,



All liberals that turn up vote for Anderson, carter becomes the first incumbent president since Taft (and second ever) to get third place in his re-election bid, in both popular and electoral votes.  Very few independents vote for Anderson, fewer for carter, or perhaps more, depending on how both run their campaigns.
Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
President: Hillary Clinton
Governor: Brown (CA), Corbett (PA), Scott (FL)
House: Emken (CA)
Other: Rob McCoy (CA Assembly)

---------------------------------------

Libertarian Internationalist Monarchist
mondale84
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1316
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30

P P P
View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2012, 11:29:25 pm »
Ignore

Well, ignoring the fact that no Kennedy would take vp,



All liberals that turn up vote for Anderson, carter becomes the first incumbent president since Taft (and second ever) to get third place in his re-election bid, in both popular and electoral votes.  Very few independents vote for Anderson, fewer for carter, or perhaps more, depending on how both run their campaigns.

No way Carter loses Georgia.
Logged


"There are no men like me. There's only me."
Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2484
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2012, 11:54:08 pm »
Ignore

Well, ignoring the fact that no Kennedy would take vp,



All liberals that turn up vote for Anderson, carter becomes the first incumbent president since Taft (and second ever) to get third place in his re-election bid, in both popular and electoral votes.  Very few independents vote for Anderson, fewer for carter, or perhaps more, depending on how both run their campaigns.

No way Carter loses Georgia.

IOTL, GA was 55-40 for Carter.  This is giving Carter -25, Anderson +20, Reagan +5 (ish)
Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
President: Hillary Clinton
Governor: Brown (CA), Corbett (PA), Scott (FL)
House: Emken (CA)
Other: Rob McCoy (CA Assembly)

---------------------------------------

Libertarian Internationalist Monarchist
Oldiesfreak1854
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8928
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 1.91

P P P

View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2012, 08:08:06 pm »
Ignore

Reagan, although Anderson would've been awfully tempting for me (not so much with Ted Kennedy though). 
Logged

Quote from: Dwight D. Eisenhower
There is nothing wrong with America that the faith, love of freedom, intelligence, and energy of her citizens cannot cure.
#Ready4Nixon
Cathcon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15339
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2012, 08:53:46 pm »
Ignore

I agree with Mr. Mondale on this one. WV first off was a very Democratic state, and frankly Anderson has little to take away from Carter there. As well, Carter did well in his home state and well relatively in his home region. Minnesota I can see getting lost because (as I recall) it went to Carter by >40% margins, though I'll have to check. As well, I can see Reagan losing Vermont in this scenario, not just lower New England. And surprisingly enough, Anderson got some of his best percentages in states like Colorado, so they may be a bit closer.
Logged

ask_not
donavan_ed
Full Member
***
Posts: 153
View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 01, 2012, 06:29:56 pm »
Ignore

even bigger landslide for Reagan
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines