Having trouble getting Romney to 269...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 11:07:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Having trouble getting Romney to 269...
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Having trouble getting Romney to 269...  (Read 1607 times)
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 17, 2012, 01:37:28 PM »
« edited: July 17, 2012, 01:40:01 PM by Reaganfan »

I was experimenting with the electoral map and using my non-partisan honest opinion predictions (I predicted Bush and Obama both winning in 2004 and 2008), I keep getting this electoral result:



Obama: 303
Romney: 235


I tried looking at different polling but no matter what, I kept seeing that number unchanged, Obama: 303.

Even if Virginia and Ohio slip to Romney as it appears likely Indiana, Florida and North Carolina may do...he still comes up short:



Obama: 272
Romney: 266


He would need one more state, and my problem is...I can't imagine any of the outstanding states (Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, New Hampshire) slipping into his column.

Any opinions on this?
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,734
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2012, 01:46:57 PM »

I've had this mental problem as well. It's Rove's 3-2-1 strategy.

As it stands right now, I'll be surprised if Romney doesn't win Florida, North Carolina, and Indiana. I also think it's possible for Romney to flip Ohio and Virginia (though it will be a challenge, and Virginia will be especially difficult). But finding that last "1" state is really troubling to me. I just don't see it. I think our best bet might be Colorado, but who knows. That won't even matter if we can't flip Virginia.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2012, 01:49:30 PM »

IA or CO would be my guess.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2012, 01:54:44 PM »

Iowa seems like a good bet (polling has shown it more Republican than, say, OH or VA) for the most likely. New Hampshire, where polling in 2011 and early 2012 showed consistent Romney leads, also can't be written off. Western states like Colorado and Nevada don't seem as promising but aren't exactly non-starters either.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,615
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2012, 02:33:09 PM »

Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,615
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2012, 02:34:58 PM »

Logged
Warren 4 Secretary of Everything
Clinton1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,208
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 17, 2012, 02:35:44 PM »
« Edited: July 17, 2012, 02:40:44 PM by Clinton1996 »

I think Iowa might slip to Romney, but honestly I don't see Romney getting there either. I keep getting Obama at 303 or 297. He's had a surprisingly consistent, albeit slim lead in Ohio. And in Virginia, Purple Strategies is the only poll besides Rasmussen that shows Romney within 2 or 3 points of Obama. Right now I'd say that Obama has A LOT of ways to get to 270. Romney only has Rove's 3-2-1 strategy, and if even one of the states Rove predicts should go to Romney, goes to Obama, Romney is screwed.

I'd say this the most likely Romney win map, give or take New Hampshire. A 272 or 276 electoral vote win. The Latino Gap makes it pretty hard to take Nevada or Colorado from Obama.
Logged
RJ
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 793
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2012, 03:19:13 PM »


I tried looking at different polling but no matter what, I kept seeing that number unchanged, Obama: 303.

Even if Virginia and Ohio slip to Romney as it appears likely Indiana, Florida and North Carolina may do...he still comes up short:



Obama: 272
Romney: 266


He would need one more state, and my problem is...I can't imagine any of the outstanding states (Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, New Hampshire) slipping into his column.

Any opinions on this?


Flipping NH, IA NV and VA will give a 269-269 result. Not particularly likely but possible.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,074
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2012, 03:45:47 PM »

Iowa seems like a good bet (polling has shown it more Republican than, say, OH or VA) for the most likely. New Hampshire, where polling in 2011 and early 2012 showed consistent Romney leads, also can't be written off. Western states like Colorado and Nevada don't seem as promising but aren't exactly non-starters either.

Yes, Iowa is Mittens' savior assuming that NH is a fail for him. If he then wins Wisconsin, but loses Virginia, we will have an electoral college tie, and the House will put Mittens in, but the Senate might make Biden his VP if the Pubs don't capture it. Tongue
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 17, 2012, 04:01:00 PM »


Both of those are wishful thinking. NH is in the same league.

The 2008 Obama campaign successfully shaped the electoral reality so that the other side had to make reckless gambles to win. We can reasonably expect much the same this year.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 17, 2012, 04:28:10 PM »

If Wisconsin turns out to not be fools' gold, here's a quite possible 269-269 map:



I don't see Romney bagging Wisconsin without also bagging Iowa, and his chances are better in Ohio than Virginia. An EV tie means Romney wins in the House and his running mate might or might not win in the Senate.
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 17, 2012, 05:21:04 PM »

If Romney is really behind in Iowa, then he should pick Thune for VP. 
Thune also has enough gravitas and respect in DC to improve the evangelical vote in Virginia. 

Portman, probably can't help in Iowa. 
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 17, 2012, 05:51:10 PM »

I agree. If the electoral math was more in his favour I'd feel a lot less confident in Obama winning. As it is though....

Proof that the rank and file of the Republican party is way out of the mainstream.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 17, 2012, 08:10:03 PM »

Colorado is not insurmountable for Romney, I don't know why people are presuming it's basically safe Obama. Purple Strategies had O up one in their latest poll, they had a tie in April as well. Marist had O up by one point too. Rasmussen also found a tie. Only PPP has had some wacky results, like Obama up ten.

New Hampshire is hard to judge. Romney must hope its anti-incumbent, fiscally conservative nature pulls him through in November. The lack of minorities helps him too. The latest poll here had Obama up four, which is not insurmountable at all.

Iowa is looking like the GOP's best bet at the moment, it's polling is on a razor.

Nevada, lol, Romney isn't winning unless he has already won all the above.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,001
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 18, 2012, 12:35:13 AM »

Whoa, even Naso's admitting this?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,722


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 18, 2012, 01:03:51 AM »


No doubt that if Romney gets 269 electoral votes, and loses the popular vote, but the House still chooses him as President, he'll have a "huge mandate", just like RomneyCare.
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 18, 2012, 01:38:29 AM »

He can certainly get above 269 like others have already mentioned.

Keep in mind recent polls had Romney with a narrow lead in Iowa, and he has led in NH and CO at a couple ofpoints or another before.
Logged
dadge
Rookie
**
Posts: 49
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -4.50

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 18, 2012, 04:59:49 AM »

EV is currently calling IA for Romney http://electoral-vote.com/

Of the rest, OH is the most likely. That gets him up to 259. That leaves him needing either VA or CO+NH. The latter seems more likely.

A couple of weeks of bad news, or POTUS foot-in-mouth, could gift Romney the 2-4% swing he needs, though the Bain stuff is stalling his campaign at the moment.

In the long term, the GOP needs to focus on PA if it wants to make life easier for itself.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2012, 06:51:55 AM »

EV is currently calling IA for Romney http://electoral-vote.com/

Of the rest, OH is the most likely. That gets him up to 259. That leaves him needing either VA or CO+NH. The latter seems more likely.

A couple of weeks of bad news, or POTUS foot-in-mouth, could gift Romney the 2-4% swing he needs, though the Bain stuff is stalling his campaign at the moment.

In the long term, the GOP needs to focus on PA if it wants to make life easier for itself.

Scratch that, they just updated it with a... PPP... poll.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,734
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 18, 2012, 12:04:21 PM »

^LOL. That's like deciding to clean your glasses with a kleenex covered in sh**t.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 18, 2012, 12:09:07 PM »

VA looks great, NH pretty good, but IA is slipping away, Ohio is, though so far more Democratic-leaning than in the past, very iffy, and yes, Colorado could go down as well, though I've high hopes for it.

So, Romney has a very reasonable chance of this high point - 278 electoral votes:

Logged
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 18, 2012, 02:45:12 PM »

Obama will win.

Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 18, 2012, 02:49:35 PM »


I'm not so sure.  He is after all a black and his white support has collapsed - he has a pretty good floor, but that's all:



Even PA and MI will likely be very close.  The fact remains that the white working class voters have swung against him very strongly.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 18, 2012, 03:39:03 PM »

Keep in mind recent polls had Romney with a narrow lead in Iowa

What?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 13 queries.