Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 01, 2015, 07:22:49 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections
| | |-+  What will be the closest state
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Print
Author Topic: What will be the closest state  (Read 1640 times)
WhyteRain
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 949
Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -2.78

View Profile
« Reply #25 on: July 20, 2012, 07:12:38 pm »
Ignore

Since someone already said Oregon, I'll say Minnesota.
Logged
NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1751
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: July 20, 2012, 07:13:21 pm »
Ignore

Florida and NC.
Logged




Bernie would probably win Vermont if Obama were deemed to have more than 272 evs in the vag.
BaldEagle1991
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1078
United States


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: July 20, 2012, 07:30:25 pm »
Ignore

Florida and Virginia
Logged

"Weezy F Baby and the F is for Phenomenal" - Lil' Wayne

"Look at this photograph/Every time I do it makes me laugh/How did our eyes get so red?/And what the hell is on Joey's head?" - Nickelback
HagridOfTheDeep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5896
Canada


Political Matrix
E: 2.32, S: 0.52


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: July 20, 2012, 08:51:33 pm »
Ignore

It'll be Virginia. In fact, I think this state is the only potential stumbling block for Mitt.
Logged
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15070


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: July 20, 2012, 09:56:21 pm »
Ignore

Iowa or Virginia. If Romney wins WI then he's already past 270.

Obviously, re the last part.  You'd pick WI if you think the election would be a big Romney win.

I picked it but I don't think Mitt will have more than 280-290 EVs.
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


Snowstalker's Last Stand
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19410
Greece


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: July 20, 2012, 10:03:33 pm »
Ignore

Wow Nap, are you really that pessimistic? Anyway, I actually think it will be one of the two smaller states i consider "wild cards"--Nevada or New Hampshire. I have a hunch that Obama will take the former and Romney the latter. Based on polling and Obama's strategy, I suspect he'll do better in Ohio than Virginia, though which one of them is closer depends on who wins.
Logged

greenforest32
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2635


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

View Profile
« Reply #31 on: July 20, 2012, 10:08:04 pm »
Ignore

Florida and NC.
Logged
WhyteRain
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 949
Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -2.78

View Profile
« Reply #32 on: July 20, 2012, 10:19:56 pm »
Ignore

Wow Nap, are you really that pessimistic? Anyway, I actually think it will be one of the two smaller states i consider "wild cards"--Nevada or New Hampshire. I have a hunch that Obama will take the former and Romney the latter. Based on polling and Obama's strategy, I suspect he'll do better in Ohio than Virginia, though which one of them is closer depends on who wins.

I think those could be good picks.  I still think Oregon and Minnesota are better.
Logged
Delicious Steak Pentagram
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30469
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #33 on: July 20, 2012, 10:46:11 pm »
Ignore

Right now Iowa, North Carolina, and Florida are likely to be the closest States.  Romney needs to change that to Ohio and Virgina if he hopes to win, and he has the time to change things, so this election is far from over.
Logged

Quote from: Ignatius of Antioch
He that possesses the word of Jesus, is truly able to bear his very silence. — Epistle to the Ephesians 3:21a
The one thing everyone can agree on is that the media is biased against them.
Make America Great Again
morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6391
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: July 20, 2012, 11:46:02 pm »
Ignore

Iowa, Virginia or Florida.

One of those three, IMO.
Logged

Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13773


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: July 21, 2012, 02:24:41 am »
Ignore


Yes but I also think the trends in this particular state couldn't be clearer.

The thing is that there could be a strong trend away from Obama and he could still win. He won it by 14 while winning nationally only by 7 so there is a lot of room for the trend to occur and not flip the state. I don't think the state flips unless Obama loses by about 2-3 points.
Logged
Chris B
cb48026
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 830


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: July 21, 2012, 04:35:52 pm »
Ignore

Florida or Virginia.
Logged
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15070


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: July 21, 2012, 06:24:50 pm »
Ignore


Yes but I also think the trends in this particular state couldn't be clearer.

The thing is that there could be a strong trend away from Obama and he could still win. He won it by 14 while winning nationally only by 7 so there is a lot of room for the trend to occur and not flip the state. I don't think the state flips unless Obama loses by about 2-3 points.

Im not saying it will flip though, and Ohio could end up closer than I expect as well.
Logged

Yeah, after four years of being a non-disruptive poster on the forum, never considered a troublemaker, even someone who was liked well enough to be elected Atlasian President, Napoleon should be allowed to stay.


SJoyce
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9553
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.81, S: -9.30

View Profile
« Reply #38 on: July 22, 2012, 08:06:28 am »
Ignore

Florida, Virginia, or New Mexico.
Logged

Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13475


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: July 22, 2012, 09:04:40 am »
Ignore

I vote for Ohio. The state has been pretty static in presidential races. Va is hard to predict and I can't see Obama winning FL under likely conditions (although I suppose he could lose narrowly).

LOL at Minnesota.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13475


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: July 22, 2012, 09:05:33 am »
Ignore

In absolute numbers, it's very likely to be NH. But not by percentage.
Logged
Yelnoc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7001
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #41 on: July 22, 2012, 12:37:16 pm »
Ignore

North Carolina.  The whole marriage amendment passed because the only people who turned out to vote were motivated by political pastors on the Sunday before the vote.  In the general election, the other half of the electorate will be out to vote.  Current polling shows the state sits on a razor thin margin, and I don't see that changing.  Obama's convention bump will obviously overly manifest itself in North Carolina, and on election day I doubt Romney will have rallied enough to overturn the Democratic advantage.  In other words, Obama will hold most of his 2008 states (sans Indiana and maybe even not Florida).
Logged

R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24909
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.83

View Profile
« Reply #42 on: July 22, 2012, 03:37:01 pm »
Ignore

Logged

pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12033
United States


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: July 22, 2012, 03:56:15 pm »
Ignore

Closest to the national average -- Ohio or Colorado. Such will hold for a bare Obama win or loss in the Electoral College.

220 EV for Obama -- Michigan or Pennsylvania.

250 EV for Obama -- Iowa or Wisconsin (shades of 2004)!

310 EV for Obama -- Florida.

370 EV for Obama -- Indiana or Missouri... maybe Arizona.

(Nobody has won between 57.1% (Truman 1948) and 65.3% (McKinley 1900) of the electoral vote since 1880, so if Mitt Romney sees himself losing  323-215 he is going to do some gambles and risk losing big or getting much closer. That is how John McCain acted in 2008, and he ended up losing badly by betting everything on Pennsylvania and losing a raft of states in the process.

400 for Obama -- Georgia or South Carolina.

410 to 450 EV for Obama -- Texas. 38 electoral votes in that state alone, a giant state with no good analogue.

Beyond that I can't make too many distinctions between the states.     




 
Logged



Your political compass

Economic Left/Right: -7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30072
Samoa


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: July 22, 2012, 05:56:49 pm »
Ignore

I think WI is in the hunt for the closest state by percentage without a Mittens knock out punch, because I suspect it will trend Pub - just like Iowa. As to which state it actually will be, well that is idle speculation. I have no idea. It could be one of several mentioned.
Logged

pepper11
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 664
United States


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: July 22, 2012, 07:55:12 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota. Narrow Obama win.
Logged

PM Econ: 4.26
PM Soc: -1.22
Comrade Funk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 782
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.43


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: July 22, 2012, 08:00:05 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota. Narrow Obama win.
So...Minnesota is more a tossup than Virginia, Florida, or Ohio?

Virginia or Florida imo.
Logged

We need a public option
pepper11
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 664
United States


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: July 22, 2012, 08:13:51 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota. Narrow Obama win.
So...Minnesota is more a tossup than Virginia, Florida, or Ohio?

Virginia or Florida imo.

The question has nothing to do with what you think the toss up states are now. The question asked what the closest state will be on election day. Its basically another way to ask how close you think the election is going to be. Right now Obama is probably up to 1-2 nationally. Based on that, I think Virginia would be the closest state. But as the national vote changes the "toss ups" change.  I expect the popular vote to swing to about Romney + 4 by election day.  That is a 10 point improvement compared to McCain. And McCain lost Minnesota by 10. So thats why I picked Minnesota.
Logged

PM Econ: 4.26
PM Soc: -1.22
Comrade Funk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 782
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.43


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: July 22, 2012, 08:22:25 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota. Narrow Obama win.
So...Minnesota is more a tossup than Virginia, Florida, or Ohio?

Virginia or Florida imo.

The question has nothing to do with what you think the toss up states are now. The question asked what the closest state will be on election day. Its basically another way to ask how close you think the election is going to be. Right now Obama is probably up to 1-2 nationally. Based on that, I think Virginia would be the closest state. But as the national vote changes the "toss ups" change.  I expect the popular vote to swing to about Romney + 4 by election day.  That is a 10 point improvement compared to McCain. And McCain lost Minnesota by 10. So thats why I picked Minnesota.
If Romney gains, I see PA being closer than MN. I guess we'll agree to disagree though.
Logged

We need a public option
Delicious Steak Pentagram
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30469
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #49 on: July 22, 2012, 10:28:27 pm »
Ignore

Minnesota. Narrow Obama win.
So...Minnesota is more a tossup than Virginia, Florida, or Ohio?

Virginia or Florida imo.

The question has nothing to do with what you think the toss up states are now. The question asked what the closest state will be on election day. Its basically another way to ask how close you think the election is going to be. Right now Obama is probably up to 1-2 nationally. Based on that, I think Virginia would be the closest state. But as the national vote changes the "toss ups" change.  I expect the popular vote to swing to about Romney + 4 by election day.  That is a 10 point improvement compared to McCain. And McCain lost Minnesota by 10. So thats why I picked Minnesota.
If Romney gains, I see PA being closer than MN. I guess we'll agree to disagree though.

While the early indications are that Romney will have a bigger swing in the Midwest than in the rest of the country, and Minnesota being a tossup in November is not impossible, if Minnesota is a tossup, Romney will at least 300 or so EV, and 350 or so is more likely.
Logged

Quote from: Ignatius of Antioch
He that possesses the word of Jesus, is truly able to bear his very silence. — Epistle to the Ephesians 3:21a
The one thing everyone can agree on is that the media is biased against them.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines