Romney tells Israeli newspaper: The Arab Spring is Obama's fault
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 19, 2024, 12:49:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Romney tells Israeli newspaper: The Arab Spring is Obama's fault
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Romney tells Israeli newspaper: The Arab Spring is Obama's fault  (Read 9727 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: July 28, 2012, 01:13:35 AM »

Welcome to politics where one politician makes things sound so easy in order to belittle his opponent. Both parties do that.

Welcome to the Atlas forum, where we discuss the foolishness of such dumb accusations, like the one Romney made here.  Wink


What was the accusation?

The accusation that Obama caused the Arab Spring, and led to the election of Islamists in the Arab world, by not simply asking dictators like Mubarak to hold free elections.
Logged
Darius_Addicus_Gaius
Rookie
**
Posts: 138
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: July 28, 2012, 01:16:42 AM »

Welcome to politics where one politician makes things sound so easy in order to belittle his opponent. Both parties do that.

Welcome to the Atlas forum, where we discuss the foolishness of such dumb accusations, like the one Romney made here.  Wink


What was the accusation?

The accusation that Obama caused the Arab Spring, and led to the election of Islamists in the Arab world, by not simply asking dictators like Mubarak to hold free elections.


No one accused him of that.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: July 28, 2012, 01:24:25 AM »

Welcome to politics where one politician makes things sound so easy in order to belittle his opponent. Both parties do that.

Welcome to the Atlas forum, where we discuss the foolishness of such dumb accusations, like the one Romney made here.  Wink


What was the accusation?

The accusation that Obama caused the Arab Spring, and led to the election of Islamists in the Arab world, by not simply asking dictators like Mubarak to hold free elections.


No one accused him of that.

You seem to be arguing in circles here.  If we go back to the initial Romney quote: "President [George W.] Bush urged [deposed Egyptian President] Hosni Mubarak to move toward a more democratic posture, but President Obama abandoned the freedom agenda and we are seeing today a whirlwind of tumult in the Middle East in part because these nations did not embrace the reforms that could have changed the course of their history, in a more peaceful manner."

What, specifically, do you think Romney is accusing Obama of doing here?  A minute ago you said "Maybe Mubarak would've agreed but we'll never know", to suggest that you understood this to be Romney accusing Obama of not asking Mubarak to hold free elections, but now it sounds like you're backtracking.
Logged
So rightwing that I broke the Political Compass!
Rockingham
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: July 28, 2012, 01:57:05 AM »

No that's not it. It's good to have free elections. It's bad to elect Islamists. Just because someone is elected to office doesn't mean that the people made the right choice. It just means they won "fair and square." Freedom in the Arab world is good as long as it stays as "freedom." The way I view it is as a work in progress. I don't think Romney would be wrong to call it that either. He's free to take my words too. In politics the bad guys can win.
Bad to elect Islamists?  The opposition to Islamism in the Middle East aren't classical liberals... they're  nationalistic socialists largely propped up by a military powerbase. You might consider that preferable to the Taliban, but not all Islamists are Taliban. In fact the closest thing to classical liberals in some of these countries are the Islamist parties.

Compare Turkey and Malaysia under the governance of Islamists to Saddam's Iraq or Assad's Syria. It should be noted that the only real advocacy or implementation of free market reforms in the Middle East have been done by Islamists(AKP in Turkey, Ennahda in Tunisia), while the secularist socialists are invariably the vanguards of stagnant socialist/corporatist systems.



 
Logged
WhyteRain
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 949
Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -2.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: July 28, 2012, 08:53:20 AM »

http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=5207

So sayeth Romney:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

So if Obama had been more like Bush, Mubarak would have offered free and fair elections without a fight, and they wouldn't have elected Islamists?

Correct.  The Egyptian "Spring" began in Jan, 2011.  There were regularly scheduled elections in Sept, 2011.  In the eight month interim, Bush would have fostered a secular opposition -- remember the only opposition that Mubarek permitted was the MB.  Obama chose not to do that.  Instead, he demanded Mubarek resign immediately, with the result that the MB was effectively the only organized party that was ready for the elections.
Logged
WhyteRain
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 949
Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -2.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: July 28, 2012, 08:57:44 AM »

A Republican is concerned about the intersection of religion and politics? That's.....interesting.

Any objective analysis would conclude that the Democrats are far more into using religion to prop up their policies -- from Obama claiming that Jesus would support his budget to Nancy Pelosi claiming that her job as Speaker was to implement policies that comport with the Gospels to the ubiquitous Democrats braying about "What Would Jesus Cut?".  Oh, and Congressional Democrats demanding more support from churches for their policies.
Logged
WhyteRain
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 949
Political Matrix
E: 6.19, S: -2.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: July 28, 2012, 09:24:58 AM »


Of course he's allowed to have it.  It just strikes me as utterly bizarre.  First the GOP insists that the Arab Spring is a vindication of Bush's "freedom agenda" (as put forth in his second inaugural address), but now that Arab Spring has toppled some dictators and we have democratic elections, the fact that some of those elections have brought Islamists to power means that the Arab Spring was actually bad, and if only Obama had asked Mubarak for democratic elections nicely, he would have said yes....and the people wouldn't have elected Islamists?  Explain to me how that would have happened.

What seems to have happened here is that Romney was trying to appeal to his audience in this interview (Israelis and Americans who are nervous about the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt), but couldn't find the right way to thread the needle so that he could agree with them without making it sound like democracy in the Arab world is bad.


No that's not it. It's good to have free elections. It's bad to elect Islamists. Just because someone is elected to office doesn't mean that the people made the right choice. It just means they won "fair and square." Freedom in the Arab world is good as long as it stays as "freedom." The way I view it is as a work in progress. I don't think Romney would be wrong to call it that either. He's free to take my words too. In politics the bad guys can win.

The elections are free; the elections are fair. The people of Tunisia and Egypt have chosen Islam (I detest the words Islamism and Islamist) and you have no right to interfere with the democratic process.

Leftists automatically claim any election of anti-Americans is automatically "free and fair", but the web says differently.  Google "fraud tunisian elections" and then do the same for every other Arab Winter election.



Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


It appears that the Clinton's pals in the Arabian peninsula are putting their petrodollars -- fattened by Leftist opposition to oil development in the U.S. -- to good use:  Bankrolling the U.S. Secretary of State and the Islamist parties.

Is there any wonder that U.S. policy has changed and Hillary now calls the MB takeover of Egypt a "positive" development?
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,131
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: July 28, 2012, 12:10:49 PM »
« Edited: July 28, 2012, 12:16:37 PM by Stranger in a strange land »

A Republican is concerned about the intersection of religion and politics? That's.....interesting.

What do you mean how so? Religion is politics over there. Are you trying to make a comparison to over here with the religious right? There is no comparison but I'm sure a political point could be scored by blurting that out. When we have car bombings in the name of Jesus taking place on the streets of our country then we'll talk. If that's not what you were trying to get at please explain.
The one's doing the car bombings aren't the "Islamists" getting elected to high office though. The Tunisian "Islamist" party in particular seems quite harmless- not meaningfully more theocratic then the Republican party in states like Utah.

If anything, Ennhada is less theocratic than the GOP. Though it won a plurality in the Tunisian elections, 60% of Tunisians voted for secular parties, and Ennhada has announced that it won't seek to implement Sharia law.

The leading party in Libya's first fair election was a secular liberal party, though it will probably have to coalition with Islamist parties to form a government.

Is there any wonder that U.S. policy has changed and Hillary now calls the MB takeover of Egypt a "positive" development?

Egyptians should be allowed to live with their mistakes.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: July 28, 2012, 01:44:26 PM »

A Republican is concerned about the intersection of religion and politics? That's.....interesting.

Any objective analysis would conclude that the Democrats are far more into using religion to prop up their policies -- from Obama claiming that Jesus would support his budget to Nancy Pelosi claiming that her job as Speaker was to implement policies that comport with the Gospels to the ubiquitous Democrats braying about "What Would Jesus Cut?".  Oh, and Congressional Democrats demanding more support from churches for their policies.

I'd say the democrats do use religion in politics a good amount, but "far more" is just preposterous when you consider the fact that in states where the conservative ratio is out of wack (my state), the only thing a republican needs to run on are their christian values it seems like. Plus the fact that it was the Moral Majority and the Christian Right that energized the Republican party and moved them towards social conservatism.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: July 28, 2012, 02:40:51 PM »


Of course he's allowed to have it.  It just strikes me as utterly bizarre.  First the GOP insists that the Arab Spring is a vindication of Bush's "freedom agenda" (as put forth in his second inaugural address), but now that Arab Spring has toppled some dictators and we have democratic elections, the fact that some of those elections have brought Islamists to power means that the Arab Spring was actually bad, and if only Obama had asked Mubarak for democratic elections nicely, he would have said yes....and the people wouldn't have elected Islamists?  Explain to me how that would have happened.

What seems to have happened here is that Romney was trying to appeal to his audience in this interview (Israelis and Americans who are nervous about the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt), but couldn't find the right way to thread the needle so that he could agree with them without making it sound like democracy in the Arab world is bad.


No that's not it. It's good to have free elections. It's bad to elect Islamists. Just because someone is elected to office doesn't mean that the people made the right choice. It just means they won "fair and square." Freedom in the Arab world is good as long as it stays as "freedom." The way I view it is as a work in progress. I don't think Romney would be wrong to call it that either. He's free to take my words too. In politics the bad guys can win.

The elections are free; the elections are fair. The people of Tunisia and Egypt have chosen Islam (I detest the words Islamism and Islamist) and you have no right to interfere with the democratic process.

Leftists automatically claim any election of anti-Americans is automatically "free and fair", but the web says differently.  Google "fraud tunisian elections" and then do the same for every other Arab Winter election.

Let me guess, you get your news from RT.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: July 28, 2012, 05:03:16 PM »

I guess the news here is that Romney is embracing the neocon foreign policy of George W Bush, something that isn't even in favor within the GOP anymore. Certainly swing voters are not going to be sold by "if only Obama was more like Bush"

Bottom line is that for this election Obama has the edge in FP and Romney's foreign trip is doing nothing to narrow the gap, and it may actually be making it worse.

I'm sure he cant wait to get home and start talking about the anemic GDP numbers because he is getting close to "I can see Russia from my house" territory when it comes to international affairs.

Logged
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,210


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: July 28, 2012, 05:19:46 PM »

What will Romney blame Obama for next, the falling murder rate, that the American wages are too high, Christmas?
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,131
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: July 28, 2012, 05:58:15 PM »

I guess the news here is that Romney is embracing the neocon foreign policy of George W Bush, something that isn't even in favor within the GOP anymore. Certainly swing voters are not going to be sold by "if only Obama was more like Bush"

Bottom line is that for this election Obama has the edge in FP and Romney's foreign trip is doing nothing to narrow the gap, and it may actually be making it worse.

I'm sure he cant wait to get home and start talking about the anemic GDP numbers because he is getting close to "I can see Russia from my house" territory when it comes to international affairs.



Romney's actually in an even deeper hole than that because the Republican stance on the Arab Spring seems to be something along the lines of, "The Arab Spring is good because it confirms the success of the Bush Freedom Agenda, and was inspired by the brilliant success of the U.S. intervention in Iraq, yet also bad because it's being run out of Tehran and is allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to take over the region and is part of a massive plot to destroy Israel." Yes, there are people who actually think this way.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,010


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: July 28, 2012, 06:02:22 PM »

Republicans appear to be in favor of democracy only if they like the results.

To be fair, this is not only Republicans - this is American foreign policy under all administrations.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,300
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: July 29, 2012, 06:40:51 AM »

Instead, he demanded Mubarek resign immediately, with the result that the MB was effectively the only organized party that was ready for the elections.

I do not recall Obama using those words explicitly in February 2011. He never directly called for Mubarak to resign.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: July 29, 2012, 06:52:47 AM »

Romney is turning into a f***ing parody...
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: July 29, 2012, 06:56:05 AM »


And the amazing part is that the American public evidently couldn't care less.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,837
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: July 29, 2012, 10:08:49 AM »

I guess the news here is that Romney is embracing the neocon foreign policy of George W Bush, something that isn't even in favor within the GOP anymore. Certainly swing voters are not going to be sold by "if only Obama was more like Bush"

Bottom line is that for this election Obama has the edge in FP and Romney's foreign trip is doing nothing to narrow the gap, and it may actually be making it worse.

I'm sure he cant wait to get home and start talking about the anemic GDP numbers because he is getting close to "I can see Russia from my house" territory when it comes to international affairs.



Romney's actually in an even deeper hole than that because the Republican stance on the Arab Spring seems to be something along the lines of, "The Arab Spring is good because it confirms the success of the Bush Freedom Agenda, and was inspired by the brilliant success of the U.S. intervention in Iraq, yet also bad because it's being run out of Tehran and is allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to take over the region and is part of a massive plot to destroy Israel." Yes, there are people who actually think this way.

The irony is that the most recent President to beat another who had strong successes in foreign policy was Bill Clinton who could never promise to 'top' his predecessor. In practice Clinton wisely adopted the foreign policy of the elder Bush practically intact.

I don't know how much credit President Obama deserves for the Arab Spring... he hasn't hurt it.  Freedom in an Islamic country means that an Islamic party can take over instead of a secular party to American taste.

The way to deal with the successes in foreign policy of a prior administration is to co-opt them -- not to pick faults at them.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: July 29, 2012, 02:55:24 PM »

Beyond spouting stuff about "stopping apologizing to the world" and "no longer leading from behind" I have yet to hear a specific policy difference Romney would have from Obama
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,047
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: July 29, 2012, 03:51:41 PM »

Mittens didn't say what the headline says he said. He seemed to be saying enabling dictators in the past has made the transition more dangerous, because of all the pent up steam as it were. However, Mittens is not very good at weaving his message in a coherent way so that you know exactly what his point is sometimes, and this is one example.
Logged
Insula Dei
belgiansocialist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: July 29, 2012, 06:37:24 PM »

Mittens didn't say what the headline says he said. He seemed to be saying enabling dictators in the past has made the transition more dangerous, because of all the pent up steam as it were. However, Mittens is not very good at weaving his message in a coherent way so that you know exactly what his point is sometimes, and this is one example.

Good thing he won't need those communication skills in the White House!
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: July 29, 2012, 06:41:50 PM »

Mittens didn't say what the headline says he said. He seemed to be saying enabling dictators in the past has made the transition more dangerous, because of all the pent up steam as it were. However, Mittens is not very good at weaving his message in a coherent way so that you know exactly what his point is sometimes, and this is one example.

Good thing he won't need those communication skills in the White House!

I heard it word for word, and while Romney didn't verbatim say "The Arab Spring is Obama's fault", you'd have to be in the realm of the desperately hopeful to not realise what he was saying. "Obama didn't continue the Bush Arab democracy project (I assume he means besides Iraq)... those states didn't reform... revolution happened and people died"... which is not only intellectually dishonest but blatantly dangerous.

Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: July 30, 2012, 01:52:39 AM »

The headline here is slightly more provocative than Romney's actual words, but I'm limited in the number of characters I can fit into a headline, so I had to give the best summary I could.  Polnut just gave what I think is a pretty accurate summation of Romney's words.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: July 30, 2012, 01:53:49 AM »

He also says not to criticize Israel.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,570


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: July 30, 2012, 03:08:18 AM »

Why's Romney wasting his time in Israel? Obama is more popular in Israel than in the US. Romney can forget about Israel's electoral votes.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.091 seconds with 13 queries.