Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 25, 2013, 02:58:28 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
Congressional Elections
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
Republicans and the Senate
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Republicans and the Senate (Read 792 times)
GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
Posts: 6298
Republicans and the Senate
«
on:
July 29, 2012, 06:18:00 pm »
Is there any realistic chance in the future that republicans will control all senate seats in the south and rocky mountain west, their election bases? Just open to discussions. Is it another hit to democrats and an argument again that republicans are stronger because the GOP could control all senate seats in the regions of their electoral base before the democrats do in theirs? Just open for discussion.
Logged
George Deukmjican will become to next President of the United States. You must read it to believe it.
Duekmjican: 287
Bradley: 241
Paul: 0
"So, I leave you all tonight with a full heart and a fervent prayer that we will meet again and we will meet often in this land where miracles are always happening, where every day is a new beginning and every life a blessing from God.
So I want to say thanks to each one of you here. Thank y
Mr.Phips
YaBB God
Posts: 4817
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #1 on:
July 29, 2012, 06:26:15 pm »
Quote from: GPORTER on July 29, 2012, 06:18:00 pm
Is there any realistic chance in the future that republicans will control all senate seats in the south and rocky mountain west, their election bases? Just open to discussions. Is it another hit to democrats and an argument again that republicans are stronger because the GOP could control all senate seats in the regions of their electoral base before the democrats do in theirs? Just open for discussion.
The Rocky Mountain West is almost impossible if you include Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico. The South is possible.
Logged
GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
Posts: 6298
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #2 on:
July 29, 2012, 09:54:15 pm »
Quote from: Mr.Phips on July 29, 2012, 06:26:15 pm
Quote from: GPORTER on July 29, 2012, 06:18:00 pm
Is there any realistic chance in the future that republicans will control all senate seats in the south and rocky mountain west, their election bases? Just open to discussions. Is it another hit to democrats and an argument again that republicans are stronger because the GOP could control all senate seats in the regions of their electoral base before the democrats do in theirs? Just open for discussion.
The Rocky Mountain West is almost impossible if you include Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico. The South is possible.
I don't think the west is impossible. The west coast is tougher than Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico.
Logged
George Deukmjican will become to next President of the United States. You must read it to believe it.
Duekmjican: 287
Bradley: 241
Paul: 0
"So, I leave you all tonight with a full heart and a fervent prayer that we will meet again and we will meet often in this land where miracles are always happening, where every day is a new beginning and every life a blessing from God.
So I want to say thanks to each one of you here. Thank y
MD
Newbie
Posts: 16
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #3 on:
July 30, 2012, 03:52:50 pm »
The south yes. The west probably not. They have a better shot at the rust belt in the future but as of now they definitely don't have a monopoly on that either.
Logged
GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
Posts: 6298
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #4 on:
July 31, 2012, 10:21:01 pm »
Another question. Out of six or seven vulnerable democratic incumbents in 2010, two were turned out of office. Will the tea party perform better in the senate races this year? Will more than two democratic incumbents be defeated this year?
Logged
George Deukmjican will become to next President of the United States. You must read it to believe it.
Duekmjican: 287
Bradley: 241
Paul: 0
"So, I leave you all tonight with a full heart and a fervent prayer that we will meet again and we will meet often in this land where miracles are always happening, where every day is a new beginning and every life a blessing from God.
So I want to say thanks to each one of you here. Thank y
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11586
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #5 on:
July 31, 2012, 10:27:45 pm »
Both Udalls are winners. CO and NM will have at least one Democratic Senator until these guys retire.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
RogueBeaver
YaBB God
Posts: 7666
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #6 on:
July 31, 2012, 10:31:01 pm »
TP:
Indiana: Teeper Richard Mourdock wipes the floor with Mr. Establishment, Dick Lugar.
Nebraska: Teeper Deb Fischer comes out of nowhere to defeat establishmentarian Jon Bruning in the final weeks.
Utah: Orrin Hatch demolishes Teeper Dan Liljenquist because of a) organization b) being establishment but also conservative.
Texas: Teeper Ted Cruz trounces establishmentarian David Dewhurst.
Wisconsin: TBD, but Tommy Thompson, Republican icon, goes from heavy favorite to slight underdog.
Arizona: Teeper Jeff Flake set to defeat Teeper Wil Cardon.
Dem incumbents: McCaskill's a goner, Tester's a slight underdog, Nelson's in a fight and Sherrod Brown could be in a fight.
Logged
+7.35, +3.65
Quote from: Peternerdman on December 31, 2012, 03:34:54 pm
Never thought I'd say this, but I'm praying for another black-yellow majority, and for the SPD to get shattered. It's exactly what it deserves.
Mr.Phips
YaBB God
Posts: 4817
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #7 on:
August 02, 2012, 06:44:09 pm »
Quote from: President Napoleon on July 31, 2012, 10:27:45 pm
Both Udalls are winners. CO and NM will have at least one Democratic Senator until these guys retire.
If Republicans couldnt beat Bennett or Reid in a year like 2010, they arent taking those seats any time soon. Colorado and New Mexico will likely each have two Democratic Senators for quite a while and Nevada will have at least one.
Logged
JoeBlow
Newbie
Posts: 14
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #8 on:
August 07, 2012, 04:43:38 pm »
That is highly unlikely. The closest we got was when Clinton was in, then he used the veto more than any other President before, so the House could have done a lot more ... nevertheless he took Credit for it all the same.
Posted by Joe
Supporter of the Presidential Election car Shade campaign on Indiegogo.
Show your support with a car shade!
Logged
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 21035
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #9 on:
August 07, 2012, 04:53:05 pm »
Quote from: Romney/Ryan 2012! on July 31, 2012, 10:31:01 pm
TP:
Indiana: Teeper Richard Mourdock wipes the floor with Mr. Establishment, Dick Lugar.
Nebraska: Teeper Deb Fischer comes out of nowhere to defeat establishmentarian Jon Bruning in the final weeks.
Utah: Orrin Hatch demolishes Teeper Dan Liljenquist because of a) organization b) being establishment but also conservative.
Texas: Teeper Ted Cruz trounces establishmentarian David Dewhurst.
Wisconsin: TBD, but Tommy Thompson, Republican icon, goes from heavy favorite to slight underdog.
Arizona: Teeper Jeff Flake set to defeat Teeper Wil Cardon.
Dem incumbents: McCaskill's a goner, Tester's a slight underdog, Nelson's in a fight and Sherrod Brown could be in a fight.
Other than getting endorsed by Palin and being an outsider candidate, what about Fischer denotes her as "the" tea party candidate, rather than "a" tea party candidate in that state? Especially when Stenberg got most of the backing from Tea Party leaders and groups.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
timothyinMD
Sr. Member
Posts: 441
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #10 on:
August 08, 2012, 07:52:54 pm »
Deb Fischer is not at all a "tea party" candidate
Logged
shua
YaBB God
Posts: 7280
Political Matrix
E: 1.16, S: -4.00
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #11 on:
August 08, 2012, 08:12:59 pm »
Quote from: GPORTER on July 29, 2012, 06:18:00 pm
Is there any realistic chance in the future that republicans will control all senate seats in the south and rocky mountain west, their election bases? Just open to discussions. Is it another hit to democrats and an argument again that republicans are stronger because the GOP could control all senate seats in the regions of their electoral base before the democrats do in theirs? Just open for discussion.
The Great Plains are stronger for the GOP than either the Rocky Mts or the South.
Logged
"Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. . . But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson
WV SBE v Barnette
http://tinyurl.com/bx359q5
Kevin
YaBB God
Posts: 4560
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #12 on:
August 09, 2012, 07:54:21 am »
Quote from: timothyinMD on August 08, 2012, 07:52:54 pm
Deb Fischer is not at all a "tea party" candidate
I don't know much about her.
However, I've heard that she is just a female version of Chuck Hagel more then anything else.
Logged
mondale84
YaBB God
Posts: 1324
Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #13 on:
August 09, 2012, 08:39:41 am »
Quote from: timothyinMD on August 08, 2012, 07:52:54 pm
Deb Fischer is not at all a "tea party" candidate
LOL...and Barack Obama isn't the Democratic nominee.
Logged
"There are no men like me. There's only me."
JoeyJoeJoe
Full Member
Posts: 149
Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.57
Re: Republicans and the Senate
«
Reply #14 on:
August 14, 2012, 11:24:34 pm »
Montana is also a tough state for Republicans in Senate races. Other than Conrad Burns, only one Republican has been elected to the Senate since the Taft administration. Montana's populism has kept the state from moving entirely to the GOP like neighboring states or the South has, I'd say.
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...