Trying to divert the discussion back to the pro's and con's of each proposal...
I'd like to point out that with only 3 Assemblymen, under the current setup, 2 Assemblymen could completely run our government, as only 2 votes are needed for a veto override, unless I'm missing something. At the very least, I think an amendment needs introduced requiring a unanimous vote to override a veto if there are only 3 Assemblymen. 2/3's works fine with 5 Assemblymen, as it requires 4 votes.
This is a good idea in the event that we only have three assemblymen.
Can we put the bickering aside and examine the merits of the purposed amendment.
