MA: Amendment to Article III of the Mideast Constitution (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:52:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MA: Amendment to Article III of the Mideast Constitution (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA: Amendment to Article III of the Mideast Constitution (Passed)  (Read 3091 times)
Lambsbread
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,375
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

« on: July 29, 2012, 09:05:49 PM »

I'm rather on the fence about this amendment. What if there aren't 5 people that run for assembly? The current system seems fine I suppose.
Logged
Lambsbread
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,375
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2012, 08:47:48 AM »

Since this is a constitutional amendment my opinion does not matter more than the opinion of any other citizen (I can neither sign nor veto this bill since it will be submitted to a popular vote if it passes the Assembly), but I'd like to stress that I am opposed to the amendment. Indeed, the current system has proved to be just fine because it is flexible and activity-dependent; in times of high activity in the region the current wording of the constitution makes sure that we have five Assemblymembers and in times of low activity the Assembly consists of three members. In my opinion, there could not be a better system to deal with the changing dynamics of Atlasia.

This is really what I'm thinking. The current system adheres to an activity limit as well as allowing for the most competitive elections possible.
Logged
Lambsbread
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,375
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 08:17:58 AM »

I'm rather on the fence about this amendment. What if there aren't 5 people that run for assembly? The current system seems fine I suppose.

Exactly, though I'm tempted to support it's passage if only to allow the voters to choose.

^^ This has been my only thought to vote in favour of this bill.
Logged
Lambsbread
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,375
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2012, 08:21:29 AM »

I'm rather on the fence about this amendment. What if there aren't 5 people that run for assembly? The current system seems fine I suppose.

Exactly, though I'm tempted to support it's passage if only to allow the voters to choose.

The current wording of the constitution is quite recent. In fact, the Mideast electorate overwhelmingly voted in support of the system we have now just a couple of months ago (the July election for Assembly were only the second election with the current system in place!). Thus, it is fair to say that the voters have already chosen and there's no need to submit this proposal to another vote at this point.

Fair enough.
Logged
Lambsbread
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,375
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2012, 07:04:32 PM »

Logged
Lambsbread
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,375
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2012, 09:10:39 PM »

Abstain
Logged
Lambsbread
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,375
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

« Reply #6 on: August 07, 2012, 10:50:21 AM »
« Edited: August 07, 2012, 07:18:05 PM by Bisexual Libertarian Redneck Repellent »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.