Whig Party Convention, Bird-in-Hand, PA
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 09:43:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Whig Party Convention, Bird-in-Hand, PA
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14
Author Topic: Whig Party Convention, Bird-in-Hand, PA  (Read 19660 times)
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 30, 2012, 06:42:26 PM »

I hereby declare our convention open!
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2012, 06:47:51 PM »

I would like to amend our bylaws.

1. For those running for President, the Party shall permit only one member to stand as the Party's candidate.
2. Party members wishing to run for President shall first submit themselves to a party primary.
3. The primary should be held no later than a month before a presidential election.
4. The candidate should be chosen by preferential vote.
5. Any party member running for president or vice president on any ticket besides that of the party shall forfeit their membership in the Whig Party.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2012, 06:52:37 PM »

Would the person that wins the Whig primary be allowed to choose a running mate from a different party?
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2012, 07:31:41 PM »

I too would like to echo Goldwater's question.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2012, 07:32:26 PM »

Would the person that wins the Whig primary be allowed to choose a running mate from a different party?

I've intended no prohibition thereof.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2012, 07:33:54 PM »

Would the person that wins the Whig primary be allowed to choose a running mate from a different party?

I've intended no prohibition thereof.

Hmm. I support the proposed amendment to the bylaws in that case.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2012, 07:58:00 PM »

Very good! I'd like to prevent the division and destructive electoral fusion/diffusion that characterized the RPP's later years.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2012, 07:59:48 PM »

Very good! I'd like to prevent the division and destructive electoral fusion/diffusion that characterized the RPP's later years.

What do you mean? The RPP was pretty monolithic.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2012, 08:05:22 PM »

Would the person that wins the Whig primary be allowed to choose a running mate from a different party?

I've intended no prohibition thereof.

If a Whig can bring a runningmate from another party then why would one that runs as a runningmate with say a MCPR or the Imperial Bloc be removed as a Whig?
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2012, 08:52:19 PM »

Would the person that wins the Whig primary be allowed to choose a running mate from a different party?

I've intended no prohibition thereof.

If a Whig can bring a runningmate from another party then why would one that runs as a runningmate with say a MCPR or the Imperial Bloc be removed as a Whig?

Because that's unlikely to happen.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 31, 2012, 12:23:54 PM »

Not as unlikely as you think.
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 31, 2012, 12:32:05 PM »

I agree with JCL... That shouldn't be in our bylaws.
Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 31, 2012, 12:53:02 PM »

I agree... I also believe we ought to have new language for filling vacancies...the no confidence vote on Vice Chairman Vacancy seems a bit cuckoo!
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 31, 2012, 01:34:56 PM »

I agree with what has been said. I'm fine with the first four sections of Simfan's amendment but not with the fift section. Also, we should fix the vice chairman vacancy problem.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 31, 2012, 04:00:05 PM »

What is the point of primaries then? There must be an enforcing quality. I'm open to removing the vice-presidential clause but there should be "sore loser" restrictions of some sort.
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 31, 2012, 04:11:51 PM »

What is the point of primaries then? There must be an enforcing quality. I'm open to removing the vice-presidential clause but there should be "sore loser" restrictions of some sort.

Aren't we the party that sort of promotes "personal responsibility" (at least on economic issues)? Wink I think we can trust that the loser of a potential primary would be loyal enough to lend his support to the winner and not become his rival as a "sore loser".
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: August 01, 2012, 12:48:29 PM »

There is no real enforcement mechanism anyway unless you seal off the general election from those who loose the primary and such wouldn't be possible in a system where parties constantly come and go.

I also take exception to the anti-RPP revisionism in this thread. Tongue
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: August 01, 2012, 01:17:27 PM »

All right, I strike it off.

Yankee! I have always been pro-RPP! Mind you, I opposed dissolution!
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: August 01, 2012, 02:35:27 PM »

Funny, don't recall specifying which one I was referring too. Maybe I was referring to both of them. Evil
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,320
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 06, 2012, 04:56:14 PM »

Bump! I'm checking in haha
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2012, 04:57:29 PM »

If Simfan hasn't headed off to Ethiopia yet and still has internet access, I think this may be the time to hold a vote on the amendments to the bylaws our dear leader has put forward.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 07, 2012, 03:50:40 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

To get the voting rolling, I approve the by-law amendment.

Aye.
Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 07, 2012, 03:55:38 PM »

I'd like to add one more plank...

In the event of a vacancy in the office of Vice Chairman, the Chairman shall begin an election to fill the post within three days
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: August 07, 2012, 04:20:41 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

There we go. Tongue

Aye. Unless someone else has something to add?

Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: August 07, 2012, 04:48:18 PM »

I vote AYE
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 14  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 13 queries.