Office of Fmr. Governor Simfan34
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 11:29:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Office of Fmr. Governor Simfan34
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 ... 24
Author Topic: Office of Fmr. Governor Simfan34  (Read 62571 times)
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #175 on: May 29, 2014, 04:52:23 PM »

As far as this country is concerned, I am a liberal.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #176 on: June 17, 2014, 12:46:27 PM »

I will be making an endorsement in the Presidential and Pacific Senate races soon.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #177 on: June 20, 2014, 11:44:55 AM »

I am surprised by the support that Federalists appear to be giving DemPGH. Do they know something (particularly regarding his ability to stand up to his own party) I do not?
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #178 on: June 20, 2014, 03:42:07 PM »

I am surprised by the support that Federalists appear to be giving DemPGH. Do they know something (particularly regarding his ability to stand up to his own party) I do not?
Well if it clears things up, I consider both DemPGH and Windjammer to be friends and I think they would do well. Granted, I have been a bit out of the loop, but I don't like the thought of the "anti-Labor" faction forming a ticket without a Federalist, then expecting us all to just fall in line behind them since they aren't Labor. I've messaged some Federalists asking them to consider voting for DemPGH.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #179 on: June 20, 2014, 03:46:24 PM »

I am surprised by the support that Federalists appear to be giving DemPGH. Do they know something (particularly regarding his ability to stand up to his own party) I do not?
Well if it clears things up, I consider both DemPGH and Windjammer to be friends and I think they would do well. Granted, I have been a bit out of the loop, but I don't like the thought of the "anti-Labor" faction forming a ticket without a Federalist, then expecting us all to just fall in line behind them since they aren't Labor. I've messaged some Federalists asking them to consider voting for DemPGH.

Noone expects anyone to fall in line.  Just interesting that the Feds are choosing to elect a Labor President, giving Labor a majority.  Not very strategic, but than the right very rarely is, except for a select few that do their best.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #180 on: June 20, 2014, 03:53:42 PM »
« Edited: June 20, 2014, 03:56:26 PM by Jbrase »

but I don't like the thought of the "anti-Labor" faction forming a ticket without a Federalist, then expecting us all to just fall in line behind them since they aren't Labor. I've messaged some Federalists asking them to consider voting for DemPGH.

Soooo it makes more sense for the feds to vote for a ticket they have less views in common with? A ticket can only have between 0 and 2 parties, and the Federalists just happen to not be one of them this time. Where is the Fed candidate on the Labor ticket? (Or better yet the platform planks in their party that make voting for them make sense from a center right perspective?)


Also, when you say "without a Federalist" does the Federalist Party endorsement not mean anything? (I am pretty certain Sirnick/Dallas won that, feel free to correct if wrong.)
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #181 on: June 20, 2014, 04:03:04 PM »

but I don't like the thought of the "anti-Labor" faction forming a ticket without a Federalist, then expecting us all to just fall in line behind them since they aren't Labor. I've messaged some Federalists asking them to consider voting for DemPGH.

Soooo it makes more sense for the feds to vote for a ticket they have less views in common with? A ticket can only have between 0 and 2 parties, and the Federalists just happen to not be one of them this time. Where is the Fed candidate on the Labor ticket? (Or better yet the platform planks in their party that make voting for them make sense from a center right perspective?)


Also, when you say "without a Federalist" does the Federalist Party endorsement not mean anything? (I am pretty certain Sirnick/Dallas won that, feel free to correct if wrong.)
The Federalist Party is the largest party in Atlasia and is double the size of the TPP and D-Rs combined. Maybe just offer the VP spot, but it doesn't seem like smart political strategy to ignore 2/3's of the "anti-Labor faction." It was an oversight on the part of Federalist Leadership to just accept that - we should have ran our own ticket if anything.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #182 on: June 20, 2014, 04:05:41 PM »
« Edited: June 20, 2014, 04:08:17 PM by Simfan34 »

I simply didn't know that Federalists wanted someone who would probably sign in favor of large tax increases, nationalisations, polygamy, and pretty much everything conservatives hate.

I'll say it again, this time without the circumlocution: as far as I am concerned, every Labor elected official, unless proven otherwise, is simply another TNF, seeing as they seem to show little resistance to his proposals.

I'm not passing judgement on that either way (not that my position is unclear), but it strikes me as odd that Federalists seem to feel fine supporting Labor candidates in light of that fact.
Logged
sentinel
sirnick
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,733
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #183 on: June 20, 2014, 04:08:36 PM »

Are you supporting me or DemPGH Simfan?
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #184 on: June 20, 2014, 04:22:10 PM »

I honestly don't know.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,072


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #185 on: June 20, 2014, 04:23:27 PM »

Should I just suspend the election?
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #186 on: June 20, 2014, 04:27:27 PM »

Only if we get to wear spiffy military uniforms during the announcement!

Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #187 on: June 20, 2014, 04:28:02 PM »


I think it would solve a lot of problems, don't you?
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #188 on: June 20, 2014, 04:28:54 PM »

Is no one concerned that the GM is making political statements and endorsements in the first place?
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,314
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #189 on: June 20, 2014, 04:29:44 PM »

Is no one concerned that the GM is making political statements and endorsements in the first place?

No, that ship sailed when Griffin became GM while Labor chair Tongue
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #190 on: June 20, 2014, 04:30:51 PM »

Is no one concerned that the GM is making political statements and endorsements in the first place?

No, that ship sailed when Griffin became GM while Labor chair Tongue

My understanding is that Griffin totally changed his behavior as GM, though.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,072


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #191 on: June 20, 2014, 04:37:32 PM »


I think it would solve a lot of problems, don't you?

I think it's clear that most people either are incapable of making the right choice or that the outcome will upset some people, so why not? It solves all the issues we've had recently.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #192 on: June 20, 2014, 04:37:52 PM »

The idea my political opinions would have somehow disappeared magically upon my assuming office would have convinced no-one, so I don't see the point of keeping up some charade about it. If someone were to challenge a "declaration" of mine, I'd be sure to support it with facts. If we want to talk political use of office, we can talk about that, but I doubt that's a route you want to go down, yes?


I think it would solve a lot of problems, don't you?

I think it's clear that most people either are incapable of making the right choice or that the outcome will upset some people, so why not? It solves all the issues we've had recently.

That's my Duke! Now, we need the Functional Constituencies Act of 2014.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,314
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #193 on: June 20, 2014, 04:39:00 PM »

Is no one concerned that the GM is making political statements and endorsements in the first place?

No, that ship sailed when Griffin became GM while Labor chair Tongue

My understanding is that Griffin totally changed his behavior as GM, though.

Yeah, I'm just saying
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #194 on: June 20, 2014, 04:45:32 PM »

The idea my political opinions would have somehow disappeared magically upon my assuming office would have convinced no-one, so I don't see the point of keeping up some charade about it. If someone were to challenge a "declaration" of mine, I'd be sure to support it with facts. If we want to talk political use of office, we can talk about that, but I doubt that's a route you want to go down, yes?

I mean, I'd gladly go down that road if I had reason to, but I'll agree that no one wants to do that.

But it's one thing to expect your political opinions to disappear, but it's another thing entirely to be bassooning them from a hilltop.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #195 on: June 20, 2014, 04:49:42 PM »

The idea my political opinions would have somehow disappeared magically upon my assuming office would have convinced no-one, so I don't see the point of keeping up some charade about it. If someone were to challenge a "declaration" of mine, I'd be sure to support it with facts. If we want to talk political use of office, we can talk about that, but I doubt that's a route you want to go down, yes?

I mean, I'd gladly go down that road if I had reason to, but I'll agree that no one wants to do that.

But it's one thing to expect your political opinions to disappear, but it's another thing entirely to be bassooning them from a hilltop.

Well yes. I have different offices. From one office I carry out my duties as GM, and from another I spew right-wing bile. Smiley
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,684
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #196 on: June 20, 2014, 08:12:12 PM »
« Edited: June 20, 2014, 08:14:46 PM by shua »

I simply didn't know that Federalists wanted someone who would probably sign in favor of large tax increases, nationalisations, polygamy, and pretty much everything conservatives hate.

I'll say it again, this time without the circumlocution: as far as I am concerned, every Labor elected official, unless proven otherwise, is simply another TNF, seeing as they seem to show little resistance to his proposals.

I'm not passing judgement on that either way (not that my position is unclear), but it strikes me as odd that Federalists seem to feel fine supporting Labor candidates in light of that fact.

Labor officials do not in fact march in lock step with TNF, but I think it can be said that unless Deus defeats Bore, a DemPGH victory would stand to be the death knell to the center-right/left balance we've had under Duke/Cincy and conservatives will have a very hard time getting anything passed, or blocking much of anything from passing.
Logged
President Tyrion
TyrionTheImperialist
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #197 on: June 20, 2014, 08:26:15 PM »

The idea my political opinions would have somehow disappeared magically upon my assuming office would have convinced no-one, so I don't see the point of keeping up some charade about it. If someone were to challenge a "declaration" of mine, I'd be sure to support it with facts. If we want to talk political use of office, we can talk about that, but I doubt that's a route you want to go down, yes?

I mean, I'd gladly go down that road if I had reason to, but I'll agree that no one wants to do that.

But it's one thing to expect your political opinions to disappear, but it's another thing entirely to be bassooning them from a hilltop.

Well yes. I have different offices. From one office I carry out my duties as GM, and from another I spew right-wing bile. Smiley

To be honest, I'm not all that concerned with any of this. You do have a right to your opinions, and I'm not going to take that away from you. If all you do is endorse candidates and whatnot, that's fine with me. But, like with any GM, I worry that things will become political, since you do control what "happens", in a sense.

But hey, you haven't done anything overtly political in that office yet. I just like to keep things in the open. When I noticed you making political statements, I only wanted to make sure that you're not up to no good.

Well, I'm sure you're up to no good, what with all the "right wing bile", but more "no good" than usual, anyway.... Wink
Logged
sentinel
sirnick
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,733
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -6.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #198 on: June 20, 2014, 11:14:41 PM »

I simply didn't know that Federalists wanted someone who would probably sign in favor of large tax increases, nationalisations, polygamy, and pretty much everything conservatives hate.

I'll say it again, this time without the circumlocution: as far as I am concerned, every Labor elected official, unless proven otherwise, is simply another TNF, seeing as they seem to show little resistance to his proposals.

I'm not passing judgement on that either way (not that my position is unclear), but it strikes me as odd that Federalists seem to feel fine supporting Labor candidates in light of that fact.

Labor officials do not in fact march in lock step with TNF, but I think it can be said that unless Deus defeats Bore, a DemPGH victory would stand to be the death knell to the center-right/left balance we've had under Duke/Cincy and conservatives will have a very hard time getting anything passed, or blocking much of anything from passing.

What Shua said.
Logged
Simfan34
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,744
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: 4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #199 on: June 21, 2014, 04:16:50 PM »

You are building this coalition by appointing someone who supported TNF over a Federalist? Acting like one can accomplish "social goals" is a fools errand, as I said, we can always invent some new social issue. Right now the D-Rs are pretty much just a social liberal party, I don't see much fiscal conservatism being effected from them.

Indeed, I have more faith right now that Windjammer as the Senate's tie breaker would be more socially conservative than the guy- good guy he is- who gave the NE polygamy and child pornography.

You're not going to get all the people under this tent to agree on everything. But you need to cast it as widely as possible. Now you have me thinking I should join the Feds, if they appoint me their chairman. After all, I did found the Whig Party...

Oh come on, its easy to pile on sirnick now that he is getting creamed but lets not act like simfan isn't a right wing federalist who has played a big part in spreading petty attacks against the left. He's closer to a Riley than a sirnick.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 ... 24  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 12 queries.