Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 25, 2016, 08:08:59 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas  (Read 1115 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36752
United States


View Profile
« on: August 10, 2012, 10:57:36 am »
Ignore

why did Scalia put this in here?  even if 'true' in some narrow sense he had to know the word choice was inflammatory, so, was he trolling out?


Today's opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct
Logged

I wanna contribute to the chaos
I don't wanna watch and then complain,
'cause I am through finding blame
that is the decision that I have made
L'exquisite Douleur
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 76914
France


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2012, 11:14:41 am »
Ignore

The actual decision supported by 5 of the justices had absolutely nothing to do with homosexuality, only O'Connor's could be accused of that.
Logged

Blue = Fake Austria
Green = Real Austria
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5199
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

P

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2012, 11:19:20 am »
Ignore

He was trolling.
Logged

Being a Libertarian is like having a fever, either you sweat it out or you die from it.
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17571
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2012, 01:48:23 pm »
Ignore

Because Scalia is a bad person.
Logged
minionofmidas - supplemental forum account
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58715
India


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2012, 03:21:33 pm »
Ignore

He was trolling.
It's what he does for a living.
Logged

If I'm shown as having been active here recently it's either because I've been using the gallery, because I've been using the search engine looking up something from way back, or because I've been reading the most excellent UK by-elections thread again.
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6996
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2012, 09:19:29 pm »
Ignore

Scalia is an ideological right-wing activist who is incapable of judging cases on their actual constitutional merits.
Logged

Solidarity Forever
Alfred F. Jones
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9451
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 13, 2012, 01:19:01 am »
Ignore

Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago.
Logged



There is a lot of humor to be mined from this as the mind of LBJ in the body of an 18 month old baby girl is quite hilarious.

19:08   oakvale   keep your furry horror out of here please

Alfred is the Atlasian equivalent of a malevolent deity.

Poo-tee-weet?
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16145


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 13, 2012, 01:21:24 am »
Ignore

Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago.

No no no. Thomas is a hack, Scalia is a troll.
Logged

A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights.



American liberals tend to judge everything on objective grounds.
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6996
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 13, 2012, 06:40:53 pm »
Ignore

Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago.

No no no. Thomas is a hack, Scalia is a troll.

In this case at least, Thomas's opinion was directly related to what he felt to be the actual constitutional merits of the case, rather than his opinion of gays.
Logged

minionofmidas - supplemental forum account
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58715
India


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 15, 2012, 02:11:29 pm »
Ignore

Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago.

No no no. Thomas is a hack, Scalia is a troll.

In this case at least, Thomas's opinion was directly related to what he felt to be the actual constitutional merits of the case, rather than his opinion of gays.
Precisely, as Thomas is a hack, not a troll.
Logged

If I'm shown as having been active here recently it's either because I've been using the gallery, because I've been using the search engine looking up something from way back, or because I've been reading the most excellent UK by-elections thread again.
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31723
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: August 15, 2012, 03:59:32 pm »

Please discuss the fine distinctions between hacks and trolls elsewhere.  Since there appears to be no more on-topic discussion...  Locking.
Logged

Quote from: Ignatius of Antioch
He that possesses the word of Jesus, is truly able to bear his very silence. ó Epistle to the Ephesians 3:21a
The one thing everyone can agree on is that the media is biased against them.
June 14th Democratic Primary Ballot
U.S. House 2: Arik Bjorn
Richland Sheriff: Leon Lott
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines