Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 19, 2013, 08:12:51 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderators: Emsworth, True Federalist)
| | |-+  "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas  (Read 717 times)
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34269
United States


View Profile WWW
« on: August 10, 2012, 10:57:36 am »
Ignore

why did Scalia put this in here?  even if 'true' in some narrow sense he had to know the word choice was inflammatory, so, was he trolling out?


Today's opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct
Logged

"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68113
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2012, 11:14:41 am »
Ignore

The actual decision supported by 5 of the justices had absolutely nothing to do with homosexuality, only O'Connor's could be accused of that.
Logged

Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2213
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 5.10, S: 1.48


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2012, 11:19:20 am »
Ignore

He was trolling.
Logged

Supersonic, registered in Tennessee, Federalist.
Liberal Economic Authoritarian. All round dirty NeoConservative.
Being a Libertarian is like having a fever, either you sweat it out or you die from it.

Marokai
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16065
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2012, 01:48:23 pm »
Ignore

Because Scalia is a bad person.
Logged


I do not want my children to be integrated into a pro-homosexual discourse
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56585
Vatican City State


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2012, 03:21:33 pm »
Ignore

He was trolling.
It's what he does for a living.
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6029
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: -3.83

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2012, 09:19:29 pm »
Ignore

Scalia is an ideological right-wing activist who is incapable of judging cases on their actual constitutional merits.
Logged

Comrade Shmoo
Alfred F. Jones
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5481
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.39, S: -5.74

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 13, 2012, 01:19:01 am »
Ignore

Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago.
Logged

[Alfred] is Jesus.

I know you're reasonable, Alfred.

Most of the forumites ... have the potential to make good bed companions
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8980


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 13, 2012, 01:21:24 am »
Ignore

Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago.

No no no. Thomas is a hack, Scalia is a troll.
Logged

Professor Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6029
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: -3.83

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 13, 2012, 06:40:53 pm »
Ignore

Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago.

No no no. Thomas is a hack, Scalia is a troll.

In this case at least, Thomas's opinion was directly related to what he felt to be the actual constitutional merits of the case, rather than his opinion of gays.
Logged

Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56585
Vatican City State


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 15, 2012, 02:11:29 pm »
Ignore

Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago.

No no no. Thomas is a hack, Scalia is a troll.

In this case at least, Thomas's opinion was directly related to what he felt to be the actual constitutional merits of the case, rather than his opinion of gays.
Precisely, as Thomas is a hack, not a troll.
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21473
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: August 15, 2012, 03:59:32 pm »

Please discuss the fine distinctions between hacks and trolls elsewhere.  Since there appears to be no more on-topic discussion...  Locking.
Logged

“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
                Clinton Lee Scott

Read Fat Man on a Diet, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory