Which "preceding poster" thread is the worst?

[Yelnoc]

I'm leaning towards "rank the preceding posters authoritarianism".

[Torie]

The problem is that "authoritarianism" is in the eye of the beholder, and a quite meaningless term, unless a term of art, which is given a specific definition. The English language is sometimes inadequately precise, and needs defined terms of art when one enters the world of the abstract. Just ask any lawyer.

[Supersonic]

I'm leaning towards "rank the preceding posters authoritarianism".

You're probably right.

[Napoleon]

Is the preceding poster a self parody

[Miles]

Is the preceding poster a self parody

This.

[Napoleon]

Is the preceding poster a self parody

This.

I don't understand why a moderator of all people would make such a thread. This is literally nothing positive that can come from that thread.

[Antonio the Sixth]

The authoritarianism thing. Self-parody comes close, however.

[Free Palestine]

Is the preceding poster a self parody

This.

I don't understand why a moderator of all people would make such a thread. This is literally nothing positive that can come from that thread.

Implying the mods are morally upstanding.

What the heck is a "self-parody" anyways?

[Torie]

Is the preceding poster a self parody

This.

I don't understand why a moderator of all people would make such a thread. This is literally nothing positive that can come from that thread.

Implying the mods are morally upstanding.

What the heck is a "self-parody" anyways?

One who over time posts stuff that someone else would have posted making fun of him, exaggerating well his little eccentricities, let's put it - because it is so over the top -  before the poster went there himself, rendering the task redundant. In this context, it requires that the poster over time has "evolved," or perhaps to put it more aptly - "regressed."  Make sense?

[Free Palestine]

Is the preceding poster a self parody

This.

I don't understand why a moderator of all people would make such a thread. This is literally nothing positive that can come from that thread.

Implying the mods are morally upstanding.

What the heck is a "self-parody" anyways?

One who over time posts stuff that someone else would have posted making fun of him, exaggerating well his little eccentricities, let's put it - because it is so over the top -  before the poster went there himself, rendering the task redundant. In this context, it requires that the poster over time has "evolved," or perhaps to put it more aptly - "regressed."  Make sense?

I guess.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Self-parody.

[Napoleon]

Is the preceding poster a self parody

This.

I don't understand why a moderator of all people would make such a thread. This is literally nothing positive that can come from that thread.

Implying the mods are morally upstanding.

What the heck is a "self-parody" anyways?

Implying that they should be, actually.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Of the two preceding posters, Jones.

[H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY]

Of the two preceding posters, Jones.

I don't think Nappy and I are threads.

[Hash]

Is the preceding poster a self parody

This.

I don't understand why a moderator of all people would make such a thread. This is literally nothing positive that can come from that thread.

Implying the mods are morally upstanding.

What the heck is a "self-parody" anyways?

Don't you have a Kim Kardashian rapefic to work on?

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Of the two preceding posters, Jones.

I don't think Nappy and I are threads.

That was a joke, son.