Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 25, 2013, 03:40:20 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2012 Elections
(Moderators:
Mr. Morden
,
Bacon King
,
Big DaddyTX
)
Shameful omission by Romney and Ryan
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Author
Topic: Shameful omission by Romney and Ryan (Read 1010 times)
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12180
Re: Shameful omission by Romney and Ryan
«
Reply #25 on:
August 16, 2012, 04:05:06 pm »
Quote from: Politico on August 15, 2012, 06:38:41 pm
Quote from: Senator Sbane on August 15, 2012, 12:20:33 pm
Quote from: Politico on August 15, 2012, 10:56:41 am
Quote from: clarence on August 15, 2012, 03:00:20 am
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79721.html?hp=r1
"Romney and Ryan said nothing at all about national security, defense, terrorism or the war Saturday in Norfolk – despite having staged their event in front of a retired U.S. battleship.
Read more:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79721.html#ixzz23bE7JxiY
"
I will say definitively- if Romney and Ryan ignore the issues of national security and don't start paying heed to the men and women in harm's way, I will cast my ballot for President Obama. Mr. Five DeferMITTs is showing his true colors and pretty boy Paul Ryan doesn't seem to have ever shown an interest in defense issues...
Enough is ENOUGH.... if Romney and Ryan want my vote and the votes of the millions of Americans (not only veterans) who worry for the safety of our homeland, our people, and those fighting for all of us- they better earn it back
Clarence, Romney's Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense will be experts in foreign affairs. Romney/Ryan and their supporters are far more committed to the military and veterans than Obama/Biden and their supporters. I am absolutely 100% confident that if you polled a majority of Obama/Biden campaign workers/volunteers, you would find that the VAST majority of them are in favor of gutting defense spending. A sizable percentage of them could care less about veterans. These are the same people who wanted to immediately pull out of Iraq if John Kerry became president in 2005. It is incredibly difficult dealing with rank-and-file Democrats when it comes to the military. The vast majority of them have no appreciation of national defense, let alone the belief that must be the government's top priority at all times.
While Romney/Ryan are not veterans, they firmly believe that national defense is our nation's top priority. They realize that nothing matters if we do not have national security. It is only for political reasons that we are only talking about the economy right now (and Medicare to point out that it is Obamacare, not Ryan's plan, that shifts resources from seniors on Medicare to poor people). As you pointed out, the U.S.S. Wisconsin was our stage prop for unveiling Romney/Ryan. We will never cut defense under Romney/Ryan. The commitment to national security is firm and unquestionable. But for political reasons, and the fact that Bin Laden's death happened on Obama's watch (even though it would have happened all the same on McCain's watch or Romney's watch had one of them won in 2008), we must talk about the economy. It is safe to say that Gates and Petraeus will be voting Romney/Ryan even though they cannot say so publicly.
Stop lying. Democrats are way more concerned about veterans healthcare and finding them jobs after they come back from war. Republicans just send them into war, score political points of them and then forget about the veterans. Almost all the work programs for veterans were passed by or proposed by Democrats. And of course the socialized healthcare they receive is a Democratic idea as well.
LOL @ the notion of a Democratic jobs program creating jobs for anybody other than bureaucrats in Washington, DC.
Wow, great retort. This is why the forum holds you in the regard that they do.
For those veterans who don't have capital to start their businesses, getting a leg up in the job application process is much appreciated. If you think I am wrong, you can maybe visit some veterans groups offices and report back on how much these programs are hated. LOL.
And while you are at it, please also report back on their opinion of their socialized healthcare, which is provided to them in a much more efficient manner than the overall healthcare system.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
Posts: 4890
Re: Shameful omission by Romney and Ryan
«
Reply #26 on:
August 16, 2012, 09:38:09 pm »
Quote from: Senator Sbane on August 16, 2012, 04:05:06 pm
Quote from: Politico on August 15, 2012, 06:38:41 pm
Quote from: Senator Sbane on August 15, 2012, 12:20:33 pm
Quote from: Politico on August 15, 2012, 10:56:41 am
Quote from: clarence on August 15, 2012, 03:00:20 am
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79721.html?hp=r1
"Romney and Ryan said nothing at all about national security, defense, terrorism or the war Saturday in Norfolk – despite having staged their event in front of a retired U.S. battleship.
Read more:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79721.html#ixzz23bE7JxiY
"
I will say definitively- if Romney and Ryan ignore the issues of national security and don't start paying heed to the men and women in harm's way, I will cast my ballot for President Obama. Mr. Five DeferMITTs is showing his true colors and pretty boy Paul Ryan doesn't seem to have ever shown an interest in defense issues...
Enough is ENOUGH.... if Romney and Ryan want my vote and the votes of the millions of Americans (not only veterans) who worry for the safety of our homeland, our people, and those fighting for all of us- they better earn it back
Clarence, Romney's Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense will be experts in foreign affairs. Romney/Ryan and their supporters are far more committed to the military and veterans than Obama/Biden and their supporters. I am absolutely 100% confident that if you polled a majority of Obama/Biden campaign workers/volunteers, you would find that the VAST majority of them are in favor of gutting defense spending. A sizable percentage of them could care less about veterans. These are the same people who wanted to immediately pull out of Iraq if John Kerry became president in 2005. It is incredibly difficult dealing with rank-and-file Democrats when it comes to the military. The vast majority of them have no appreciation of national defense, let alone the belief that must be the government's top priority at all times.
While Romney/Ryan are not veterans, they firmly believe that national defense is our nation's top priority. They realize that nothing matters if we do not have national security. It is only for political reasons that we are only talking about the economy right now (and Medicare to point out that it is Obamacare, not Ryan's plan, that shifts resources from seniors on Medicare to poor people). As you pointed out, the U.S.S. Wisconsin was our stage prop for unveiling Romney/Ryan. We will never cut defense under Romney/Ryan. The commitment to national security is firm and unquestionable. But for political reasons, and the fact that Bin Laden's death happened on Obama's watch (even though it would have happened all the same on McCain's watch or Romney's watch had one of them won in 2008), we must talk about the economy. It is safe to say that Gates and Petraeus will be voting Romney/Ryan even though they cannot say so publicly.
Stop lying. Democrats are way more concerned about veterans healthcare and finding them jobs after they come back from war. Republicans just send them into war, score political points of them and then forget about the veterans. Almost all the work programs for veterans were passed by or proposed by Democrats. And of course the socialized healthcare they receive is a Democratic idea as well.
LOL @ the notion of a Democratic jobs program creating jobs for anybody other than bureaucrats in Washington, DC.
Wow, great retort. This is why the forum holds you in the regard that they do.
For those veterans who don't have capital to start their businesses, getting a leg up in the job application process is much appreciated. If you think I am wrong, you can maybe visit some veterans groups offices and report back on how much these programs are hated. LOL.
The programs put in place decades ago have helped out veterans. Any recent Democratic program is largely a joke.
Quote
And while you are at it, please also report back on their opinion of their socialized healthcare, which is provided to them in a much more efficient manner than the overall healthcare system.
Our men and women of the military earned their healthcare, which is a very sustainable program. Properly maintaining it goes hand-in-hand with having a successful, strong military. Handing the same deal to welfare queens will diminish the quality of healthcare for veterans, and lead to devastating rationing and high taxes.
Logged
"Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
- Bastiat
mondale84
YaBB God
Posts: 1324
Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30
Re: Shameful omission by Romney and Ryan
«
Reply #27 on:
August 16, 2012, 10:10:01 pm »
The Republican ticket isn't running on any real platform. Romney has no real insight into any issue or area, he's just spewing talking points and hoping they stick. He's the epitome of the used car salesman politician: trying to sneak into the White House without really being put to the tough questions that need answering. Mitt Romney is - so far - the most unvetted presidential candidate in US history.
Logged
"There are no men like me. There's only me."
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12180
Re: Shameful omission by Romney and Ryan
«
Reply #28 on:
August 17, 2012, 12:41:08 am »
Quote from: Politico on August 16, 2012, 09:38:09 pm
Quote from: Senator Sbane on August 16, 2012, 04:05:06 pm
Quote from: Politico on August 15, 2012, 06:38:41 pm
Quote from: Senator Sbane on August 15, 2012, 12:20:33 pm
Quote from: Politico on August 15, 2012, 10:56:41 am
Quote from: clarence on August 15, 2012, 03:00:20 am
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79721.html?hp=r1
"Romney and Ryan said nothing at all about national security, defense, terrorism or the war Saturday in Norfolk – despite having staged their event in front of a retired U.S. battleship.
Read more:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79721.html#ixzz23bE7JxiY
"
I will say definitively- if Romney and Ryan ignore the issues of national security and don't start paying heed to the men and women in harm's way, I will cast my ballot for President Obama. Mr. Five DeferMITTs is showing his true colors and pretty boy Paul Ryan doesn't seem to have ever shown an interest in defense issues...
Enough is ENOUGH.... if Romney and Ryan want my vote and the votes of the millions of Americans (not only veterans) who worry for the safety of our homeland, our people, and those fighting for all of us- they better earn it back
Clarence, Romney's Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense will be experts in foreign affairs. Romney/Ryan and their supporters are far more committed to the military and veterans than Obama/Biden and their supporters. I am absolutely 100% confident that if you polled a majority of Obama/Biden campaign workers/volunteers, you would find that the VAST majority of them are in favor of gutting defense spending. A sizable percentage of them could care less about veterans. These are the same people who wanted to immediately pull out of Iraq if John Kerry became president in 2005. It is incredibly difficult dealing with rank-and-file Democrats when it comes to the military. The vast majority of them have no appreciation of national defense, let alone the belief that must be the government's top priority at all times.
While Romney/Ryan are not veterans, they firmly believe that national defense is our nation's top priority. They realize that nothing matters if we do not have national security. It is only for political reasons that we are only talking about the economy right now (and Medicare to point out that it is Obamacare, not Ryan's plan, that shifts resources from seniors on Medicare to poor people). As you pointed out, the U.S.S. Wisconsin was our stage prop for unveiling Romney/Ryan. We will never cut defense under Romney/Ryan. The commitment to national security is firm and unquestionable. But for political reasons, and the fact that Bin Laden's death happened on Obama's watch (even though it would have happened all the same on McCain's watch or Romney's watch had one of them won in 2008), we must talk about the economy. It is safe to say that Gates and Petraeus will be voting Romney/Ryan even though they cannot say so publicly.
Stop lying. Democrats are way more concerned about veterans healthcare and finding them jobs after they come back from war. Republicans just send them into war, score political points of them and then forget about the veterans. Almost all the work programs for veterans were passed by or proposed by Democrats. And of course the socialized healthcare they receive is a Democratic idea as well.
LOL @ the notion of a Democratic jobs program creating jobs for anybody other than bureaucrats in Washington, DC.
Wow, great retort. This is why the forum holds you in the regard that they do.
For those veterans who don't have capital to start their businesses, getting a leg up in the job application process is much appreciated. If you think I am wrong, you can maybe visit some veterans groups offices and report back on how much these programs are hated. LOL.
The programs put in place decades ago have helped out veterans. Any recent Democratic program is largely a joke.
Quote
And while you are at it, please also report back on their opinion of their socialized healthcare, which is provided to them in a much more efficient manner than the overall healthcare system.
Our men and women of the military earned their healthcare, which is a very sustainable program. Properly maintaining it goes hand-in-hand with having a successful, strong military. Handing the same deal to welfare queens will diminish the quality of healthcare for veterans, and lead to devastating rationing and high taxes.
Yeah, Black people don't deserve healthcare.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
Posts: 4890
Re: Shameful omission by Romney and Ryan
«
Reply #29 on:
August 17, 2012, 03:21:34 pm »
Quote from: Senator Sbane on August 17, 2012, 12:41:08 am
Quote from: Politico on August 16, 2012, 09:38:09 pm
Quote from: Senator Sbane on August 16, 2012, 04:05:06 pm
Quote from: Politico on August 15, 2012, 06:38:41 pm
Quote from: Senator Sbane on August 15, 2012, 12:20:33 pm
Quote from: Politico on August 15, 2012, 10:56:41 am
Quote from: clarence on August 15, 2012, 03:00:20 am
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79721.html?hp=r1
"Romney and Ryan said nothing at all about national security, defense, terrorism or the war Saturday in Norfolk – despite having staged their event in front of a retired U.S. battleship.
Read more:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0812/79721.html#ixzz23bE7JxiY
"
I will say definitively- if Romney and Ryan ignore the issues of national security and don't start paying heed to the men and women in harm's way, I will cast my ballot for President Obama. Mr. Five DeferMITTs is showing his true colors and pretty boy Paul Ryan doesn't seem to have ever shown an interest in defense issues...
Enough is ENOUGH.... if Romney and Ryan want my vote and the votes of the millions of Americans (not only veterans) who worry for the safety of our homeland, our people, and those fighting for all of us- they better earn it back
Clarence, Romney's Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense will be experts in foreign affairs. Romney/Ryan and their supporters are far more committed to the military and veterans than Obama/Biden and their supporters. I am absolutely 100% confident that if you polled a majority of Obama/Biden campaign workers/volunteers, you would find that the VAST majority of them are in favor of gutting defense spending. A sizable percentage of them could care less about veterans. These are the same people who wanted to immediately pull out of Iraq if John Kerry became president in 2005. It is incredibly difficult dealing with rank-and-file Democrats when it comes to the military. The vast majority of them have no appreciation of national defense, let alone the belief that must be the government's top priority at all times.
While Romney/Ryan are not veterans, they firmly believe that national defense is our nation's top priority. They realize that nothing matters if we do not have national security. It is only for political reasons that we are only talking about the economy right now (and Medicare to point out that it is Obamacare, not Ryan's plan, that shifts resources from seniors on Medicare to poor people). As you pointed out, the U.S.S. Wisconsin was our stage prop for unveiling Romney/Ryan. We will never cut defense under Romney/Ryan. The commitment to national security is firm and unquestionable. But for political reasons, and the fact that Bin Laden's death happened on Obama's watch (even though it would have happened all the same on McCain's watch or Romney's watch had one of them won in 2008), we must talk about the economy. It is safe to say that Gates and Petraeus will be voting Romney/Ryan even though they cannot say so publicly.
Stop lying. Democrats are way more concerned about veterans healthcare and finding them jobs after they come back from war. Republicans just send them into war, score political points of them and then forget about the veterans. Almost all the work programs for veterans were passed by or proposed by Democrats. And of course the socialized healthcare they receive is a Democratic idea as well.
LOL @ the notion of a Democratic jobs program creating jobs for anybody other than bureaucrats in Washington, DC.
Wow, great retort. This is why the forum holds you in the regard that they do.
For those veterans who don't have capital to start their businesses, getting a leg up in the job application process is much appreciated. If you think I am wrong, you can maybe visit some veterans groups offices and report back on how much these programs are hated. LOL.
The programs put in place decades ago have helped out veterans. Any recent Democratic program is largely a joke.
Quote
And while you are at it, please also report back on their opinion of their socialized healthcare, which is provided to them in a much more efficient manner than the overall healthcare system.
Our men and women of the military earned their healthcare, which is a very sustainable program. Properly maintaining it goes hand-in-hand with having a successful, strong military. Handing the same deal to welfare queens will diminish the quality of healthcare for veterans, and lead to devastating rationing and high taxes.
Yeah, Black people don't deserve healthcare.
Plenty of active/retired black men and women in the military who deserve the quality healthcare they get, so what are you talking about? Why even bring race into this discussion? The military is colorless, and the nation should be too. It never will be until Democrats stop pandering and baiting.
«
Last Edit: August 17, 2012, 03:24:29 pm by Politico
»
Logged
"Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
- Bastiat
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...