Early voting has begun in Indiana.
I was planning on heading over to the courthouse later today to cast my vote, but am still unsure on the Senate race.
Has Donnelly intelligently grappled with entitlements? If not, go the the flawed Pub is my advice. That is the issue where the rubber meets the road. The rest is noise (I used that term twice today - sorry about that). I mean, he's not in the Akin category (someone who has brought shame on us all, and needs to cease to be a public figure ASAP).
@ Torie: But if you vote for the flawed Republican then how will the pubs ever learn to nominate better candidates
@ Tmthforu94: Some food for thought
“To me the highlight of politics, frankly, is to inflict my opinion on someone else.” - Richard Mourdock
“I have a mindset that says bipartisanship ought to consist of Democrats coming to the Republican point of view." - Richard Mourdock
These are not the words of someone interested in governing.
Also:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/18/richard-mourdock-claim-cancer_n_1606005.htmlAdditionally, it is worth noting (and please correct me if I am wrong) that Mourdock ran a very mean-spirited and nasty primary campaign (and he really didn't need to). I am not arguing that you should necessarally vote for Donnelly (although I obviously hope that you do), but I don't see how as enthusiastic a Luger supporter as yourself could vote for Mourdock after the primary campaign that he ran. In other words, I hope you vote for Donnelly, but even if you decide not to, there is still another candidate on the ballot who didn't needlessly drag Luger's name through the mud (the Libertarian candidate). Like I said, food for thought.