Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2014, 11:13:25 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderator: Beet)
| | |-+  Abortion
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 Print
Poll
Question: What's your stance on abortion?
Abortion should be legal and federally funded   -44 (42.3%)
Abortion should be legal, but not federally funded   -29 (27.9%)
Abortion should not be legal and should not be federally funded   -28 (26.9%)
Other (please specify)   -3 (2.9%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 103

Author Topic: Abortion  (Read 3705 times)
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21656
Germany


View Profile
« on: August 18, 2012, 02:33:56 pm »
Ignore

Go.

I tend to agree the most with option 2.
Logged

Assemblyman JCL
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3816
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2012, 02:37:43 pm »
Ignore

Option 3
Logged

Congressional Races
Jackie Walorski (R/IN-2)
Marlin Stutzman (R/IN-3)
Todd Rokita (R/IN-4)
Chard Reid (Lib/IN-5)
Luke Messer (R/IN-6)
Carlos May (R/IN-7)
Larry Bucshon (R/IN-8)
Todd Young (R/IN-9)
Tom Massie (R/KY-4)
Senator Meiji (D-NC)
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8309
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.03, S: -8.96

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2012, 02:42:21 pm »
Ignore

Option 2, though I support option 1 for people who are already receiving federal health care (people on Medicaid).
Logged

Emperor Scott
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17188
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -5.74

View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2012, 02:44:09 pm »
Ignore

Abortion should not be legal, but should be federally funded.

Lean option 2.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2012, 03:02:07 pm by Senator Scott »Logged



Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8103
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2012, 02:59:56 pm »
Ignore

Legal and federally funded.  Excising a fetus is expensive, yall.
Logged

Free Bradley Manning
Senator Goldwater
Republitarian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7513
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2012, 03:28:07 pm »
Ignore

Option 2.
Logged

Cathcon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14799
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 18, 2012, 04:00:37 pm »
Ignore

Legal and federally funded.  Excising a fetus is expensive, yall.

Expensive it may be, but why would others want to pay for it?
Logged

Vosem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4877
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2012, 04:44:46 pm »
Ignore

Abortion should certainly be legal. As to federal funding, if a universal healthcare system exists, then it's only fair to include abortion, but it would be best if such a system didn't exist.
Logged
Marokai Besieged
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16632
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2012, 04:49:26 pm »
Ignore

Abortions are medical procedures that are, at times medically recommended and potentially life saving for the mother. There is no rationale I can agree with that makes abortion legal, but also not federally supported.
Logged

Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14718


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2012, 04:49:36 pm »
Ignore

Option one, but I could support option two if necessary.

Abortions are medical procedures that are, at times medically recommended and potentially life saving for the mother. There is no rationale I can agree with that makes abortion legal, but also not federally supported.

I guess the rationale is having to navigate a political system filled with fundies, moderate heroes and corporate cronies.
Logged

Please Senators, don't let the Russians, a folk of alcoholic homophobic, take Crimee
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15458


Political Matrix
E: -8.39, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2012, 06:23:59 pm »
Ignore

Option 1 with reservations (restrictions on 2nd trimester abortions and a near-total ban on 3rd trimester abortions)
Logged

dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20893
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 18, 2012, 06:38:59 pm »
Ignore

Option 1.  The first two are free, the third one you pay for with your ovaries.
Logged

Quote from:   Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8103
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 18, 2012, 06:51:38 pm »
Ignore

Legal and federally funded.  Excising a fetus is expensive, yall.

Expensive it may be, but why would others want to pay for it?

Because overall, making abortions available to all regardless of their socioeconomic status would be beneficial.

Though of course, I don't support the federal government at all.  But as long as we're going to have this bourgeois society, we might as well fund stuff like that.
Logged

Free Bradley Manning
Night Man
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11771
United States


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 18, 2012, 07:37:35 pm »
Ignore

Option 1 with reservations (restrictions on 2nd trimester abortions and a near-total ban on 3rd trimester abortions)
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3440
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: August 18, 2012, 07:49:30 pm »
Ignore

Abortions for all!
Logged



Economic score: -6.26
Social score: -7.74
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35357
United States
View Profile
« Reply #15 on: August 19, 2012, 01:44:43 pm »
Ignore

how about a tax deduction for abortions?
Logged
fezzyfestoon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8301
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: August 19, 2012, 03:14:30 pm »
Ignore

Flush 'em. And encourage dumb young women to do so. But that'll never happen because the government can't make more money for its members without population growth, so babies will continue to be softly encouraged.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9471
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: August 20, 2012, 04:17:38 pm »
Ignore

Ban it.

I must admit that the number of people supporting option 1 is disturbing. I have accepted that most people here favor the 'right' to abort, but state funding is another story.
Logged

Clearly the solution is to privatize presidential elections.

So, in less than four years, get excited for the 2016 MetLife Financial U Pick The Prez Extravaganza. If you tweet a picture of your completed ballot with the hashtag #ivoted, you could win a trip for two to the inauguration or an iTunes gift card.
Ready For Hoover '28!
Mechaman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13387
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -8.26

View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 20, 2012, 04:24:36 pm »
Ignore

Option 1 and 1/2th.

Abortions should be legal but only have federal funding for extenuating circumstances.  Kind of like unemployment comp or something like that.

I'm not sure I would be in favor of MORE abortions, but I can say that having a state ban on abortions sets a pretty dangerous precedent.  Primarily, I'm concerned that such bans could have ramifications that give the state a blank check to control a person's body.
Logged

and then a skeleton popped out
Ghost_white
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3420


Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: 7.39

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 20, 2012, 04:51:05 pm »
Ignore

closer to 3 but obviously simply banning abortion won't necessarily stop it, having access to forms of birth control and certain social services would help reduce the rate more regardless of legality (sane).
Logged


That has got to be one of the most retarded proposals I have read on this forum.

Don't worry, I'm sure more will crop up shortly.
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10224
Russian Federation


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: August 20, 2012, 08:18:14 pm »
Ignore

Flush 'em. And encourage dumb young women to do so. But that'll never happen because the government can't make more money for its members without population growth, so babies will continue to be softly encouraged.

Who decides which young women are dumb?  Or are you assuming that about all of them?
Logged

  

" But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette
Night Man
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11771
United States


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: August 21, 2012, 09:12:50 am »
Ignore

Option 1 and 1/2th.

Abortions should be legal but only have federal funding for extenuating circumstances.  Kind of like unemployment comp or something like that.

I'm not sure I would be in favor of MORE abortions, but I can say that having a state ban on abortions sets a pretty dangerous precedent.  Primarily, I'm concerned that such bans could have ramifications that give the state a blank check to control a person's body.

...perhaps if a state can mandate a person keeping a fetus to term, it can mandate abortion as well.
Logged
Ready For Hoover '28!
Mechaman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13387
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.13, S: -8.26

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: August 21, 2012, 10:07:39 am »
Ignore

Option 1 and 1/2th.

Abortions should be legal but only have federal funding for extenuating circumstances.  Kind of like unemployment comp or something like that.

I'm not sure I would be in favor of MORE abortions, but I can say that having a state ban on abortions sets a pretty dangerous precedent.  Primarily, I'm concerned that such bans could have ramifications that give the state a blank check to control a person's body.

...perhaps if a state can mandate a person keeping a fetus to term, it can mandate abortion as well.

Yes, very much so.

The state could get a blank check to regulate the population of certain groups if given such power.
Logged

Night Man
Angry_Weasel
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11771
United States


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: August 21, 2012, 10:17:29 am »
Ignore

Option 1 and 1/2th.

Abortions should be legal but only have federal funding for extenuating circumstances.  Kind of like unemployment comp or something like that.

I'm not sure I would be in favor of MORE abortions, but I can say that having a state ban on abortions sets a pretty dangerous precedent.  Primarily, I'm concerned that such bans could have ramifications that give the state a blank check to control a person's body.

...perhaps if a state can mandate a person keeping a fetus to term, it can mandate abortion as well.

Yes, very much so.

The state could get a blank check to regulate the population of certain groups if given such power.

Perhaps population control conspiracies aren't as far from the truth as they might seem and perhaps are propagated by those who are likely allied with the conspirators themselves.
Logged
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2412
United States


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: August 21, 2012, 10:42:24 am »
Ignore

Abortion should be legal except for in the third trimester unless the mother's health is in serious jeopardy. My attitude on federal funding would vary based on the type of health care system in place, but in principle I am not at all opposed to option one in this poll.
Logged

Liberal socialist
Political Matrix results: -3 (Economic), -8 (Social)
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines