Which Senate seats are most vulnerable in '14? (both parties)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 11:31:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Which Senate seats are most vulnerable in '14? (both parties)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Which Senate seats are most vulnerable in '14? (both parties)  (Read 613 times)
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,050
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 12, 2012, 10:10:58 PM »

Which Senate seats are most in danger in '14, on both sides?

I know the Democrats will probably have the most vulnerable seats, since this is the freshman class of 2008.

But before we write them off, every freshman Democratic Senator from the class of '06 who ran for re-election WON (I think only Webb retired, and the Democrats kept his seat). So I wouldn't say it's certain that the Democrats lose 6 seats (which is what the GOP would need to have a majority in the Senate, since Biden will be VP until '17).
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2012, 10:50:49 PM »

On the Democratic side the seats I am most concerned about are:  South Dakota, Alaska, Louisiana, North Carolina and to somewhat lesser degree Arkansas.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2012, 10:53:30 PM »

Dem: What Ogre said.

GOP: Maine automatically flips if Collins retires. Otherwise no worries.
Logged
badgate
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,466


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2012, 10:54:53 PM »

Ogre - Sen Pryor is at 53% approval in AR
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,050
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2012, 11:26:24 PM »

On the Democratic side the seats I am most concerned about are:  South Dakota, Alaska, Louisiana, North Carolina and to somewhat lesser degree Arkansas.
So, then it looks like the Democrats keep the Senate in '14 too.

And who knows which "safe" Republicans are replaced by crazies in the primaries, like Mourdock/Akin/Angle/O'Donnell/Miller/etc.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2012, 11:31:16 PM »

All the incumbent Republicans are in ruby-red states. Only one who's almost certainly getting a primary (which may not necessarily be successful) is Graham in SC.
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,050
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2012, 11:39:56 PM »

All the incumbent Republicans are in ruby-red states. Only one who's almost certainly getting a primary (which may not necessarily be successful) is Graham in SC.
There's talk of a primary challenge against McConnell too.
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2012, 11:44:26 PM »
« Edited: November 12, 2012, 11:48:48 PM by Ogre Mage »

Ogre - Sen Pryor is at 53% approval in AR

Yes, that's why I'm less worried about Pryor.  But Scott Brown and Lincoln Chafee also had good approvals in states where the opposing party was dominant.


On the Democratic side the seats I am most concerned about are:  South Dakota, Alaska, Louisiana, North Carolina and to somewhat lesser degree Arkansas.
So, then it looks like the Democrats keep the Senate in '14 too.

I hope so.  But my list does not take possible retirements into account.  We'll have to wait and see.  
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2012, 11:56:30 PM »

Alaska: LG Treadwell seems more likely to run than Parnell.

Arkansas: Griffin and Cotton will decide between themselves who's running for what.

Illinois: Durbin is leaning towards running, so Safe D and the talented Pubs either stay put or run for guv.

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=781B299D-2451-4370-95CA-5C2E5A770B7D
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2012, 12:00:20 AM »

I think Kentucky is a potential pick-up opportunity if we can get a top-tier candidate to run against McConnell. Would be glorious to take him out.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2012, 12:05:21 AM »

McConnell won in 2008, he's not losing in a midterm year. As TNF can attest, many people like his seniority and the pork he brings back home. Plus he has a massive political operation (recently hired Paul's COS) and has been very proactive in snuffing out the first hint of a challenge.
Logged
Cryptic
Shadowlord88
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 891


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 13, 2012, 01:00:07 AM »

McConnell won in 2008, he's not losing in a midterm year. As TNF can attest, many people like his seniority and the pork he brings back home. Plus he has a massive political operation (recently hired Paul's COS) and has been very proactive in snuffing out the first hint of a challenge.


The points you make are true, but I wouldn't be so quick to rule out a Democratic win in Kentucky.  I think we can pull it off with the right candidate. 
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,232
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 13, 2012, 09:34:32 AM »

Chandler's loss in Kentucky doesn't make me feel very optimistic about the future of Democrats in the state. However, depending on the political environment in 2014, I wonder how the state may perform with the significant drag from the top of the ticket. At the least, we can hopefully scare McConnell and make the race competitive. It would require a very strong candidate. Is there any chance Steve Beshear runs?
Logged
traininthedistance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2012, 11:29:08 AM »

On the Democratic side the seats I am most concerned about are:  South Dakota, Alaska, Louisiana, North Carolina and to somewhat lesser degree Arkansas.

Strangely enough, Alaska is the seat here I am least worried about.

On the other hand, I expect that Pryor will be a goner no matter how popular he is.  The others all have a chance of hanging on.  Hopefully we can flip Maine at least, to make up for the three or four seats we're likely to lose here.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 13, 2012, 01:43:38 PM »

Democrats
Alaska
Minnesota
New Hampshire
North Carolina
Oregon

Republicans
Georgia (but still a long shot for Democrats)
Kentucky
Maine
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2012, 08:03:04 PM »

Jeff Merkley's reelection isn't a gimme, but based on current information he isn't in major trouble.  His general incumbent strength and approvals are only lukewarm, similar to Kay Hagan.  But Merkley is in a state considerably more favorable to Democrats.  Obama won Oregon 54-42.  Democrats hold all partisan statewide offices.  And the OR GOP does not have much of a bench.

Perhaps Merkley will run a very poor reelection campaign or have a scandal or 2014 will turn into a Republican wave.  But in the absence of that I would be very surprised if he lost.  I would probably put him in the same category with Mark Udall, Jeanne Shaheen and Al Franken -- potentially competitive but at the moment those incumbents look tough to beat.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.235 seconds with 12 queries.