Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2014, 11:40:33 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections
| | |-+  2012 Senatorial Election Polls (Moderator: Tender Branson)
| | | |-+  MO-Sen (PPP): Akin in the lead
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: MO-Sen (PPP): Akin in the lead  (Read 953 times)
krazen1211
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5783


View Profile
« on: August 20, 2012, 10:15:51 pm »
Ignore

Akin 44
McCaskill 43


Heh. PPP might be cooking the books of course.
Logged
Svensson
NVTownsend
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 646


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2012, 10:24:46 pm »
Ignore

Correction: race tied and slipping fast, as it goddamn well should be. If the Missouri GOP has any sense or decency within any bone in their self-righteous fundamentalist bodies, they'll have put Akin out of a career before sunset tomorrow.
Logged
Harry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18881
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2012, 10:25:31 pm »
Ignore

Not sure whether this is good or bad news.
Logged
krazen1211
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5783


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2012, 10:31:03 pm »
Ignore

Correction: race tied and slipping fast, as it goddamn well should be. If the Missouri GOP has any sense or decency within any bone in their self-righteous fundamentalist bodies, they'll have put Akin out of a career before sunset tomorrow.


Same as the last PPP poll. Of course, 1 or both may be Junk Polls.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14794
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: 4.35

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2012, 10:35:04 pm »
Ignore

I ordinarly would also be calling krazen out on his spin here, but I wouldn't want to annoy Phil Tongue
Logged


morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5298
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2012, 10:35:46 pm »
Ignore

When was the poll taken?
Logged
krazen1211
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5783


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 20, 2012, 10:37:01 pm »
Ignore

I ordinarly would also be calling krazen out on his spin here, but I wouldn't want to annoy Phil Tongue


What the heck did I spin?
Logged
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18845
United States
View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 20, 2012, 10:39:09 pm »
Ignore

I ordinarly would also be calling krazen out on his spin here, but I wouldn't want to annoy Phil Tongue


What the heck did I spin?

Read the thread title.
Logged
krazen1211
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5783


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 20, 2012, 10:40:24 pm »
Ignore

I ordinarly would also be calling krazen out on his spin here, but I wouldn't want to annoy Phil Tongue


What the heck did I spin?

Read the thread title.

PPP's twitter described Akin as leading.
Logged
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18845
United States
View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 20, 2012, 10:45:04 pm »
Ignore

I ordinarly would also be calling krazen out on his spin here, but I wouldn't want to annoy Phil Tongue


What the heck did I spin?

Read the thread title.

PPP's twitter described Akin as leading.

Then maybe both you and PPP need to learn how margin of error works.

The race is tied.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14169


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -2.61

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 20, 2012, 10:48:11 pm »
Ignore

His favorable/unfavorables are 24-58 and yet he still leads. Hyperpartisanship at its finest.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 51732


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 20, 2012, 10:57:18 pm »
Ignore

Love the Dem hackery here. Yes, a one point lead is essentially a tie but you mean to tell me that you guys haven't seen other candidates ahead by a point or two in the past and thought "Hey, so and so is leading" instead of immediately thinking it's tied? Give me a break. I must have missed the clamoring for the "Kaine ahead by two" threads to be renamed.
Logged

MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 780
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 20, 2012, 10:59:21 pm »
Ignore

Love the Dem hackery here. Yes, a one point lead is essentially a tie but you mean to tell me that you guys haven't seen other candidates ahead by a point or two in the past and thought "Hey, so and so is leading" instead of immediately thinking it's tied? Give me a break. I must have missed the clamoring for the "Kaine ahead by two" threads to be renamed.

Of course you know Phil, around here, shooting the messenger is the style.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/08/akin-44-mccaskill-43.html#more

Funnily enough, his numbers haven't budged since PPP's last poll in June (when Akin led 45-44%). What's miraculous is that Akin is leading despite a hugely unpopular 24/58% favorability rating. McCaskill has a poor 41/53% job rating. Wonder if this poll will silence a lot of the GOP bigwigs screaming for him to step aside.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2012, 11:02:26 pm by MorningInAmerica »Logged

"...the media helped tip the scales. I didn't think the coverage in 2008 was especially fair..."

- Jake Tapper, Senior White House Correspondent for ABC News

"The media is very susceptible to doing what the Obama campaign wants."

 - Mark Halperin, author of 2008's 'Game Change.'
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29447
United States


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 20, 2012, 11:01:04 pm »
Ignore

With favorables like that, I don't see how he wins. He will face enormous downward pressure as he tries to get out of the mid 40's.
Logged

He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again! Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!



True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28079
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: August 21, 2012, 12:05:56 am »
Ignore

With favorables like that, I don't see how he wins. He will face enormous downward pressure as he tries to get out of the mid 40's.

McCaskill doesn't have good favorables either, and Akin may be able to repair things enough to win in November.  If Akin had said this before the primary, he'd have been sunk of course, but he still has time.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33782
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: August 21, 2012, 12:11:00 am »

That's a really pro-GOP sample from PPP (GOP+9).

But despite this, it's pretty shocking that Akin still leads among Independents after his comments.
Logged
Corporate Worship
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38492
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: August 21, 2012, 05:05:34 am »
Ignore

A tremendous victory for the sanctity of RAPE!

Seriously though, I'm wondering if PPP is trolling a bit here and massaged their head-to-head numbers in order to help Akin look stronger than he is. Given the fact that they're Ds at the end of the day, it's not surprising that they'd want him to stick around. You're not going to win anything with favorables like that and the money will be cut off. And there's that sample that Tender posted for the poll. Umm, yeah. So I still think he's toast, one way or the other. This will give him a talking point to help get through the next few days though. "See, the latest poll shows that I can still win!" Very sneaky, PPP!

Now, let's see if Rasmussen comes out with a poll that has him trailing by 10 to counter this. Tongue
Logged

PASOK Leader Hashemite
Hashemite
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31365
South Africa



View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: August 21, 2012, 05:27:08 am »
Ignore

Post-rape comments?

If so, then Jesus F. Christ.
Logged

Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6907
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 21, 2012, 06:02:54 am »
Ignore

I always knew the good ol' state of Missourah would still back Akin.
Logged

Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12792


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 21, 2012, 06:21:07 am »
Ignore

Scott Rasmussen must be burning with jealousy at PPP's ability to land on the perfect number to generate controversy.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14794
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: 4.35

View Profile
« Reply #20 on: August 21, 2012, 09:32:25 am »
Ignore

Akin 44
McCaskill 43


Heh. PPP might be cooking the books of course.



#pwned.
Logged


Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 51732


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: August 21, 2012, 09:57:51 am »
Ignore

How is that "owning" someone? Not to say that they are cooking the books but just because they say they aren't devious enough to do it doesn't mean they aren't doing it.
Logged

MorningInAmerica
polijunkie3057
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 780
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.52

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: August 21, 2012, 10:30:04 am »
Ignore

Akin 44
McCaskill 43


Heh. PPP might be cooking the books of course.



#pwned.

Whether they say they're "cooking the books or not," riddle me this....how in the world does Missouri go from a D+6 turnout in 2008 to a R+9 turnout in 2012. Miles is smart enough to know that that doesn't pass the smell test. Just because PPP says they're not being devious doesn't mean they aren't. And the fact that they enjoy people thinking they are devious certainly seems odd.

Ace of Spades points out the problem with their numbers here: http://minx.cc/?post=332101

Quote
Since PPP decided it can't help itself, I've done you all a service.
I went through their ridiculous R+9 sample and ONLY changed the D/R/I proportions to match previous elections, and an even turnout.
With R+9, PPP's headline screams Akin up by 1. It is an obvious, sick ploy to get this delusional Bio101 flunkie to stay in and cost us a seat.

Here are the real numbers:
If turnout in November matches 2008 (it won't):
McCaskill 49.25% Akin 39% (this is a D+6 turnout model)


If turnout in November is even, an incredible feat for the GOP considering heavy turnout in St Louis and Kansas City during an election year:
McCaskill 47% Akin 40%.


If turnout in November matches the best we have ever seen in the state (R+3 during 2010):
McCaskill 45% Akin 41%.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2012, 10:32:08 am by MorningInAmerica »Logged

"...the media helped tip the scales. I didn't think the coverage in 2008 was especially fair..."

- Jake Tapper, Senior White House Correspondent for ABC News

"The media is very susceptible to doing what the Obama campaign wants."

 - Mark Halperin, author of 2008's 'Game Change.'
krazen1211
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5783


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: August 21, 2012, 10:39:52 am »
Ignore

Akin 44
McCaskill 43


Heh. PPP might be cooking the books of course.



#pwned.

Whether they say they're "cooking the books or not," riddle me this....how in the world does Missouri go from a D+6 turnout in 2008 to a R+9 turnout in 2012. Miles is smart enough to know that that doesn't pass the smell test. Just because PPP says they're not being devious doesn't mean they aren't. And the fact that they enjoy people thinking they are devious certainly seems odd.

Ace of Spades points out the problem with their numbers here: http://minx.cc/?post=332101

Quote
Since PPP decided it can't help itself, I've done you all a service.
I went through their ridiculous R+9 sample and ONLY changed the D/R/I proportions to match previous elections, and an even turnout.
With R+9, PPP's headline screams Akin up by 1. It is an obvious, sick ploy to get this delusional Bio101 flunkie to stay in and cost us a seat.

Here are the real numbers:
If turnout in November matches 2008 (it won't):
McCaskill 49.25% Akin 39% (this is a D+6 turnout model)


If turnout in November is even, an incredible feat for the GOP considering heavy turnout in St Louis and Kansas City during an election year:
McCaskill 47% Akin 40%.


If turnout in November matches the best we have ever seen in the state (R+3 during 2010):
McCaskill 45% Akin 41%.


PPP themselves had it at D+2 a couple months ago.
Logged
Likely Voter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4607


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: August 21, 2012, 12:21:41 pm »
Ignore

I give PPP the benefit of the doubt that they arent cooking the books. However the whole poll itself is flawed. They cant get a good sample in one evening of calls on the first day of media coverage on this issue.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines