Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 30, 2014, 10:14:53 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  History (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Should the Falklands War have required intervention from the rest of NATO?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Should the Falklands War have required intervention from the rest of NATO?  (Read 662 times)
Passing Through a Screen Door
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 71900
Sweden


View Profile
« on: August 26, 2012, 01:49:54 pm »
Ignore

Argentina did in fact attack the United Kingdom after all.
Logged

Victory over Inks dedicated in memory.


01/05/2004-01/10/2014
--
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36851
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2012, 02:30:46 pm »
Ignore

I'm not sure about language of the treaty, but since British didn't request allies from NATO to participate, I guess not.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9236
Israel


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2012, 03:05:42 pm »
Ignore

That would be awkward, albeit not unprecedented for the United States to have to fight against its own ally
Logged


House endorsements: Walter (AZ-9), Loudermilk (GA-11), Blum (IA-1), Dietzel (LA-6), Poliquin (ME-2), McMillin (MI-8), Emmer (MN-6), Mills (MN-8), Brat (VA-7), Didier (WA-4), Mooney (WV-2)
only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58783
India


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2012, 04:03:56 pm »
Ignore

Argentina did in fact attack the United Kingdom after all.
In fact, it did nothing of the kind.

Quote
The 14 British Overseas Territories are under the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom, though they do not form part of it.

Tongue

Also, to be hyperformalistic, at the time of the Falklands War they were called the British Dependent Territories.
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
Pilchard
Rookie
*
Posts: 25
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.22

P P P
View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2012, 05:44:20 pm »
Ignore

Probably not, as Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty says an attack on a member would need to be north of the Tropic of Cancer to invoke the collective self defence of Article 5.

Quote
For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:

  • on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France [2], on the territory of or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;
  • on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines