Snowstalker/Drj for Atlasia: Never mind, just vote Nix/DemPGH

[John_Engle]

Snowmentum

If you support the Party of John, John support your race & will campaign For you with Ronald Reagan on NBC.

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

Snowmentum

If you support the Party of John, John support your race & will campaign For you with Ronald Reagan on NBC.

I am hereby dropping out of the Senate race and endorsing Mr. Engle.

not really...

[Adam Griffin]

Congratulations, Mr. Senator!

[Northeast Rep Snowball]

Snowmentum

If you support the Party of John, John support your race & will campaign For you with Ronald Reagan on NBC.

I am hereby dropping out of the Senate race and endorsing Mr. Engle.

not really...

is it bad that I went through the source code to see what you said there?

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

Well, I won! Feeling good about having won my first political office since I was Northeast Governor.

I hope to serve Atlasia and her people well. Good job to all my opponents for a great race.

[tmthforu94]

Congratulations! I'm sure you'll do a great job.

[Speed of Sound]

Congratulations, Snow! I know that you'll make us all proud.

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

Thanks to everybody!

...now when do I swear in?

[Adam Griffin]

Thanks to everybody!

...now when do I swear in?

Here.

[Talleyrand]

Congratulations! I'm sure you'll do a great job.

Yes, it's great to have another Senator from the Mideast Region.

[Simfan34]

Many congratulations, Snowstalker! Best of luck to you.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

A belated congratulations, I know you will make Atlasia proud

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

Open.

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

In response to recent...scandals, these shall be given out for free to be put in signatures.

[HagridOfTheDeep]

When a Labour candidate gets my second preference, you know there was something wrong with the Liberal. I'm glad I was right.

[Barnes]

In response to recent...scandals, these shall be given out for free to be put in signatures.

What a nice little idea!

[Insula Dei]

Senator,

I know (and you know) that there can be at this time but one question that's at the centre of the mind of any of our patres conscripti. This is an important matter for all of us, and for those of us who are civic-minded in particular. It's a question by which this Senate will be judged for decades and centuries to come.

The question is simple: are you with the people or are you against them? If on the Senate floor there rolls that aborted love child of degeneracy and castration, a proposal to impeach our President, without any constitutional wrongdoing on his behalf whatsoever, will you vote it down, or will you back this monstruosity? Will you demonstrate yourself a statesman worthy of our trust, or will you forever mark yourself as belonging to them?

I thank you in advance for the time and trouble you'll no doubt take to answer my simple question.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Senator,

I know (and you know) that there can be at this time but one question that's at the centre of the mind of any of our patres conscripti. This is an important matter for all of us, and for those of us who are civic-minded in particular. It's a question by which this Senate will be judged for decades and centuries to come.

The question is simple: are you with the people or are you against them? If on the Senate floor there rolls that aborted love child of degeneracy and castration, a proposal to impeach our President, without any constitutional wrongdoing on his behalf whatsoever, will you vote it down, or will you back this monstuosity? Will you demonstrate yourself a statesman worthy of our trust, or will you forever mark yourself as belonging to them?

I thank you in advance for the time and trouble you'll no doubt take to answer my simple question.

Senator Snowstalker, like all of the members of the great legislative body known as the Atlasian Senate, is for the people (regardless of how he answers that question).  You may agree with him or you may disagree with him, but I don't think any of us can deny that he (and his fellow Senators) are acting in what they believe to be the best interests of the people (even if they are sometimes wrong about what is in the best interests of the people).  I say this as someone who would strongly opposes impeachment.  Good people can disagree.

[Snowstalker Mk. II]

Senator,

I know (and you know) that there can be at this time but one question that's at the centre of the mind of any of our patres conscripti. This is an important matter for all of us, and for those of us who are civic-minded in particular. It's a question by which this Senate will be judged for decades and centuries to come.

The question is simple: are you with the people or are you against them? If on the Senate floor there rolls that aborted love child of degeneracy and castration, a proposal to impeach our President, without any constitutional wrongdoing on his behalf whatsoever, will you vote it down, or will you back this monstuosity? Will you demonstrate yourself a statesman worthy of our trust, or will you forever mark yourself as belonging to them?

I thank you in advance for the time and trouble you'll no doubt take to answer my simple question.

I support the people. I am currently undecided on whether I would support a hypothetical impeachment effort; the question is not whether there was wrongdoing but whether it warrants removal from office.

[Speed of Sound]

Perhaps I have quite quickly fallen out of the loop....

Despite his terrible approval numbers, I haven't seen anyone suggest impeaching the President. I'm not sure I understand the fiery rhetoric of Insula Dei here and elsewhere as I haven't seen the slightest implication that an impeachment movement is upcoming or that it would have any support.

[Oakvale]

[LastVoter]

[Insula Dei]

Senator,

I know (and you know) that there can be at this time but one question that's at the centre of the mind of any of our patres conscripti. This is an important matter for all of us, and for those of us who are civic-minded in particular. It's a question by which this Senate will be judged for decades and centuries to come.

The question is simple: are you with the people or are you against them? If on the Senate floor there rolls that aborted love child of degeneracy and castration, a proposal to impeach our President, without any constitutional wrongdoing on his behalf whatsoever, will you vote it down, or will you back this monstuosity? Will you demonstrate yourself a statesman worthy of our trust, or will you forever mark yourself as belonging to them?

I thank you in advance for the time and trouble you'll no doubt take to answer my simple question.

I support the people. I am currently undecided on whether I would support a hypothetical impeachment effort; the question is not whether there was wrongdoing but whether it warrants removal from office.

Indeed the question is not whether there was wrongdoing; there was none. This means the second bit of your reply is nonsensical.

Look, here's how it is, the Senate shall be at the service of the People, or it shall cease to be.

[Speed of Sound]

Senator,

I know (and you know) that there can be at this time but one question that's at the centre of the mind of any of our patres conscripti. This is an important matter for all of us, and for those of us who are civic-minded in particular. It's a question by which this Senate will be judged for decades and centuries to come.

The question is simple: are you with the people or are you against them? If on the Senate floor there rolls that aborted love child of degeneracy and castration, a proposal to impeach our President, without any constitutional wrongdoing on his behalf whatsoever, will you vote it down, or will you back this monstuosity? Will you demonstrate yourself a statesman worthy of our trust, or will you forever mark yourself as belonging to them?

I thank you in advance for the time and trouble you'll no doubt take to answer my simple question.

I support the people. I am currently undecided on whether I would support a hypothetical impeachment effort; the question is not whether there was wrongdoing but whether it warrants removal from office.

Indeed the question is not whether there was wrongdoing; there was none. This means the second bit of your reply is nonsensical.

Look, here's how it is, the Senate shall be at the service of the People, or it shall cease to be.

It's something of a statement to suggest that this President has recently been at the service of the People, wouldn't you say?

[Barnes]

I will add one thing: At the moment, Napoleon's conduct does not warrant impeachment, but the constitution does not list the reasons for impeachment. There is no mention of "high crimes and misdemeanors" as is present in the United States constitution.